Notices
997 Forum 2005-2012
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

998 in 2011 now..

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-07-2009, 09:08 PM
  #1  
rijowysock
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
 
rijowysock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: The Arctic Cold
Posts: 5,718
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 5 Posts
Default 998 in 2011 now..

"porsche has officially pushed new model development of the 998 ahead 1 full year and according to 911 editor Steve bennett its now officially 2011! not 2012 as previously hinted."

Woah!
Old 08-07-2009, 09:26 PM
  #2  
OldGuy
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
OldGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Southwest Idaho
Posts: 10,474
Likes: 0
Received 51 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

I believe the 997.2 PDK is a bigger change than the 998 is going to be. I think the important changes in the 998 will be in the TT and the GT cars getting the 9A1 motor and PDK.
Old 08-07-2009, 09:49 PM
  #3  
DRJMK
Burning Brakes
 
DRJMK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: SC
Posts: 815
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Default

that was exactly my question on the turbo board. So, we really have a 991 without the body style changes... good! Maybe the 997.2 values won't go down when the new style comes out!
Old 08-08-2009, 10:33 AM
  #4  
djcxxx
Three Wheelin'
 
djcxxx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,960
Received 349 Likes on 176 Posts
Default

Of course if this information is true it implies that the changes will not be radical, i.e. the 911 will not morph into an up market Cayman. The 998/991 is more than likely to be evolutionary than revolutionary and the sooner we see it the more of the former and less of the latter. Ergo, those who are satisfied with their current 911 will see no need to upgrade, and those who want to upgrade or haven't yet purchased will state the new car is the best yet, surpassing all that went before.
Old 08-08-2009, 11:04 AM
  #5  
yemenmocha
Rennlist Member
 
yemenmocha's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 4,019
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Honestly the 997.2 with PDK and new engine is pretty much a new/separate model in my mind. I can't help but wonder if they intended to have these changes in the 998 in 2011 but decided to implement some of them earlier because of the competition out there (M3 isn't far behind the 997.1, plus others).

So does this mean late next year, 2010, we'll see the 2011 model? Or will we see the car in 2011 as a 2012?
Old 08-08-2009, 11:08 AM
  #6  
Eric - Plug Guy
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
Eric - Plug Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 5,995
Received 195 Likes on 108 Posts
Default

Changes have usually be evolutionary, not revolutionary, through the years.

Only time testing will prove out the new block.

But yet, the style on the .2 TT is really not significantly different from the intro 997 turbo. Was hoping to see some additional styling changes.

Bottom line though: if PAG did not hedge currency, a 225k price tag will keep these beasts on the dealer lots.

For me, I've bought at the end of the model cycle before. Not sure I'd jump now, though these are enticing models. I might wait it out.

Time will tell.....

(my notes refer to the new turbo, sorry for any confusion....)
__________________
Eric
Chief Plug Guy
BumperPlugs.com

2022 GT3 Touring
2009 997 Turbo Cab
2018 M2 6sp


Gone but not forgotten
2004 C4S Cabriolet
1999 C2 Cab



Old 08-08-2009, 01:40 PM
  #7  
mdrums
Race Director
 
mdrums's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tampa
Posts: 15,358
Received 182 Likes on 129 Posts
Default

I am pretty much with Eric. It will take a lot for me to jump out of my 09 997S. If the deal was right and the economy improves a little and the new GT3 comes out with PDK that is about the only way for me to jump.
Now that the Turbo has PDK I can;t wait to drive one but I still wonder how the Turbo would be on the track. I'm sure it is awesome!
Old 08-08-2009, 01:46 PM
  #8  
997CS4
Instructor
 
997CS4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The 998 was always planned for fall 2011
Old 08-08-2009, 01:54 PM
  #9  
vigilante architect
Track Day
 
vigilante architect's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Couple of ways to interpret this info, launch in 2011 or launch in fall of 2010 (around 12 months) as a MY11 car?
Old 08-08-2009, 01:56 PM
  #10  
FriedEgg
Instructor
 
FriedEgg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Right now, Porsche is getting pressed from all sides. Cars like the GT-R - billed as a better performer for half the price, and cars from Ferrari and AM becoming more reliable...where a 911 is no longer the only "everyday supercar". Not counting competitions from R8, BMW M's etc, it's not hard to see why they need to continue to push ahead.

It's obvious that the 911 models evolve over time, but that's more on design. Contrary to some opinions on this thread however, I'd anticipate that Porsche will come up with a 998 that would be a bigger jump from a 997.2 dynamically, than the shift from 996 to 997.

I was looking back on some old issues of evo where at the launch of the 997, they compared the base Carrera to BMW's 645Ci, Noble, and a 996 3.4. Competitions are much stiffer these days.
Old 08-08-2009, 05:29 PM
  #11  
djcxxx
Three Wheelin'
 
djcxxx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,960
Received 349 Likes on 176 Posts
Default

If the 911 is to remain recognizably a 911 there is very little room left to go in terms of design and even technology if the relative price points are to remain where they are. A much lighter 911 could be built but not at the current pricing. Porsche is a far more price sensitive manufacturer than people suspect. Customers for 911s and Turbos are affluent but the vast majority are not "blank check" customers. The guy who can buy a new Ferrari isn't shopping price the way Porsche customers do. Porsche has also overproduced cars which has taken its toll on the marque's intrinsic market value (i.e. depreciation). That's the type of analysis that drives Porsche's decision to incrementally evolve the 911 and stay w/ a formula that has worked for 40+ years.
Old 08-08-2009, 08:31 PM
  #12  
ltc
Super Moderator
Needs More Cowbell

Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
ltc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 29,323
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by OldGuy
I think the important changes in the 998 will be in the TT and the GT cars getting the 9A1 motor and PDK.
In the 997TT and 996TT, there is already discussion/pictures/links for the 2010 997 Turbo having the 9A1 motor.

It will take a long time for this engine to live up to the history of the M64 proper dry sump lump. It was the last legacy link back to the aircooled 963/993 days, gone along with wooden floorboards.

The PDK in the higher HP cars has always been (and still is) a warranty liability issue for PAG...now VAG. It has had a short introduction in the lower HP cars...and soon the Panamera, but those warranty claims have been very closely watched.
Old 08-08-2009, 09:06 PM
  #13  
yemenmocha
Rennlist Member
 
yemenmocha's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 4,019
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by djcxxx
If the 911 is to remain recognizably a 911 there is very little room left to go in terms of design and even technology if the relative price points are to remain where they are. A much lighter 911 could be built but not at the current pricing. Porsche is a far more price sensitive manufacturer than people suspect. Customers for 911s and Turbos are affluent but the vast majority are not "blank check" customers. The guy who can buy a new Ferrari isn't shopping price the way Porsche customers do. Porsche has also overproduced cars which has taken its toll on the marque's intrinsic market value (i.e. depreciation). That's the type of analysis that drives Porsche's decision to incrementally evolve the 911 and stay w/ a formula that has worked for 40+ years.

I think those are good points. I'm not trying to start a class warfare debate here, but arguably most Porsche buyers are "upper middle class" whereas I don't think the same is true for new Ferraris.
Old 08-08-2009, 09:55 PM
  #14  
rijowysock
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
 
rijowysock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: The Arctic Cold
Posts: 5,718
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by vigilante architect
Couple of ways to interpret this info, launch in 2011 or launch in fall of 2010 (around 12 months) as a MY11 car?
MY11 car, so out a year from now.
Old 08-08-2009, 11:40 PM
  #15  
ADias
Nordschleife Master
 
ADias's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Southwest
Posts: 8,310
Received 400 Likes on 273 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ltc
... The PDK in the higher HP cars has always been (and still is) a warranty liability issue for PAG...now VAG. It has had a short introduction in the lower HP cars...and soon the Panamera, but those warranty claims have been very closely watched.

The 997.2 1st year has been very uneventful from a reliability perspective - a HPFP glitch and little else. PDK had no statistically meaningful issues.


Quick Reply: 998 in 2011 now..



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:18 PM.