Notices
997 Forum 2005-2012
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

997 - Mini Compact

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 13, 2008 | 01:04 PM
  #1  
jhbrennan's Avatar
jhbrennan
Thread Starter
Rennlist Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 6,570
Likes: 89
From: Austin
Default 997 - Mini Compact

Interesting article in today's WSJ - the 997 is classified as a mini-compact and is supposed to get 40mpg by 2015. All the limited production, high performance cars are going to be affected.
Reply
Old May 13, 2008 | 01:32 PM
  #2  
Alan Smithee's Avatar
Alan Smithee
Rennlist Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 5,531
Likes: 467
From: Los Angeles
Default

Yup...that's our government. Rather than raise gas taxes which would guarantee a reduction in our demand for foreign oil, they are legislating what we drive...which will have very little (if any) effect on oil consumption, and kill off some high performance cars in the process.
Reply
Old May 13, 2008 | 04:38 PM
  #3  
Edgy01's Avatar
Edgy01
Poseur
Rennlist Member
Veteran: Army
Veteran: Air Force
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 17,731
Likes: 289
From: Santa Barbara, CA
Default

The other day I put the cruise control on after filling up with gas. Kept it at about 58 mph. It resulted in a consumption rate of 29.9 mpg. If the Direct Injection engines are supposed to be 20% better than we're already looking at a potential of nearly 36 mpg with the MY09 cars.

Of course, it was the opposite of fun. I nearly fell asleep!
Reply
Old May 13, 2008 | 04:46 PM
  #4  
Coochas's Avatar
Coochas
Rennlist Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 10,213
Likes: 861
From: 01776
Default

I wonder how they come up with "mini-compact" for the 997: last time I checked it's kind of a big car!
What is a Mini Cooper classified as? Nano-sub-mini compact?
Reply
Old May 13, 2008 | 05:22 PM
  #5  
MikeBat's Avatar
MikeBat
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 3,121
Likes: 1
From: Montreal
Default

It seems it will get to a point where we will have to have a commuter appliance, and for fun, a track only car.

The problem then becomes the restrictions at tracks and the utter lack of tracks to begin with.
Reply
Old May 13, 2008 | 07:34 PM
  #6  
jhbrennan's Avatar
jhbrennan
Thread Starter
Rennlist Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 6,570
Likes: 89
From: Austin
Default

Originally Posted by Coochas
I wonder how they come up with "mini-compact" for the 997: last time I checked it's kind of a big car!
What is a Mini Cooper classified as? Nano-sub-mini compact?
It's based on the "footprint" of the vehicle - the number of square feet a vehicle covers when parked in the driveway. A BWM 3 series has a footprint of 45 sf and will need to average 37mpg while the 5 series with a footprint of 49 sf will be allowed to average 31mpg - in this case the government has decided bigger
can averge less - interesting times for auto makers...and us as consumers.
Reply
Old May 13, 2008 | 08:52 PM
  #7  
KeninBlaine's Avatar
KeninBlaine
Drifting
15 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,616
Likes: 35
From: Semiahmoo/Blaine, Wa
Default

Originally Posted by jhbrennan
It's based on the "footprint" of the vehicle - the number of square feet a vehicle covers when parked in the driveway. A BWM 3 series has a footprint of 45 sf and will need to average 37mpg while the 5 series with a footprint of 49 sf will be allowed to average 31mpg - in this case the government has decided bigger
can averge less - interesting times for auto makers...and us as consumers.
Simple solution is for Porsche to increase the footprint.
Reply
Old May 13, 2008 | 09:32 PM
  #8  
CayenneS2083's Avatar
CayenneS2083
Advanced
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Default

porsche will just have to go mega widebody, maybe we will start seeing the 911s with mega hips
Reply
Old May 13, 2008 | 11:36 PM
  #9  
purrybonker's Avatar
purrybonker
Pro
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 576
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver
Default

Originally Posted by Alan Smithee
Yup...that's our government. Rather than raise gas taxes which would guarantee a reduction in our demand for foreign oil, they are legislating what we drive...which will have very little (if any) effect on oil consumption, and kill off some high performance cars in the process.
Geez, I couldn't agree with you more. Taxes need to go waaaay up on fuel - absolutely the only way to impact consumption is at the consumer level - that's where the stuff gets burned, not in the car factories.

All higher MPG does is present an appearance of progress while actually incenting higher levels of consumption.
Reply
Old May 13, 2008 | 11:42 PM
  #10  
purrybonker's Avatar
purrybonker
Pro
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 576
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver
Default

Actually, us wealthy capitalist conservatives should be cheering higher gas taxes. It's a regressive form of taxation and let's the rich benefit disproportionately - just like we should cheer photo radar.

I love photo-radar - it's like a speeding "tax" or a road toll - I can basically chose to speed and pay the "tax" (break the law without personal consequences other than the fine, no "record' or insurance issues).

Yeah photo radar. Yeah higher fuel taxes. Less cars on the road to get in my way....

/tounge from cheek.
Reply
Old May 14, 2008 | 11:18 PM
  #11  
nyca's Avatar
nyca
Drifting
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,420
Likes: 1,922
From: new york
Default

Things are going to get very bad with these new regulations. Right now, is the golden age of the automobile. The cars produced over the next 5-10 years will be the best ever produced.

Just look at the list of known changes to auto lineups coming as a result of these new "global warming" initiatives:

- plans for the mid engined corvette have been shelved. The C7 will have at most a 4.7L engine, versus the current 6.2L

- The Viper successor has been cancelled, the current Viper will be sold until 2012 - then its gone

- Lincoln no longer has V8s, and the Mustang will eventually not offer one either.

- GM has cancelled new V8 development for regular Cadillacs, the V6 will be the top of the line.
Reply
Old May 15, 2008 | 03:10 AM
  #12  
Dr. Car's Avatar
Dr. Car
Racer
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 371
Likes: 5
From: San Diego, CA
Default

nyca, those are dire signs if true, or at least sure signs of a sea change in future autos. How confident are you in the accuracy of that information?
Reply
Old May 15, 2008 | 09:31 PM
  #13  
nyca's Avatar
nyca
Drifting
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,420
Likes: 1,922
From: new york
Default

June Road & Track, page 31. It's all there, and that's just the tip of the iceberg.
Reply
Old May 15, 2008 | 10:20 PM
  #14  
p-cardriver's Avatar
p-cardriver
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,245
Likes: 1
From: Flagler Beach
Default

Originally Posted by nyca
Things are going to get very bad with these new regulations. Right now, is the golden age of the automobile. The cars produced over the next 5-10 years will be the best ever produced.

Just look at the list of known changes to auto lineups coming as a result of these new "global warming" initiatives:

- plans for the mid engined corvette have been shelved. The C7 will have at most a 4.7L engine, versus the current 6.2L

- The Viper successor has been cancelled, the current Viper will be sold until 2012 - then its gone

- Lincoln no longer has V8s, and the Mustang will eventually not offer one either.

- GM has cancelled new V8 development for regular Cadillacs, the V6 will be the top of the line.

Is this current thinking, or 1978? We went through all of this, and once we all adjusted to the prices of gasoline, we started demanding V8 engines and bigger vehicles again. I think this has more to do with our roads, distances, lifestyles and attitudes - stuff that doesn't change very easily or quickly. So I'd guess we go through a lull, then get some pretty interesting stuff again. Geez, a Tesla or Fiskar could be pretty fun cars once the range gets up, the cost comes down a tad, and the weight drops some. They're almost there...

Maybe I'm just a rosy glasses optimist...
Reply
Old May 15, 2008 | 10:26 PM
  #15  
jason952's Avatar
jason952
Addict
Rennlist Member

20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,422
Likes: 26
From: Florence, SC
Default

The market should dictate mpg and demand for displacement, etc. Govt has no place.
Reply



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 08:15 AM.