leasing for "dummies"
#31
Racer
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You're both right, in a way. Getting a car with a higher residual value is good whether you're buying OR leasing. A lower residual value makes it worse either way. Part of the reason American car residual values are so low is that the leases and purchases are often heavily subsidized. I looked at a new F250 diesel a couple years ago. The sticker was $43k, invoice was about $36k, and I had gotten the salesman down to $33k without even really trying because (I discovered) there was an $8k cash-to-dealer incentive going on.
#32
Although I was tempted to lease a BMW, I never did so, but I believe that there may be a hidden advantage to leasing. Let's say that your new 997 is involved in an accident, and you for one reason or another can't conclusivly prove that it was the fault of the other driver. For example two cars driving in opposite directions on a country road collide and there are no witnesses. Your Insurance company pays to have your car repaired, but you can't in most cases have them compensate you for diminished vale. So if you are the owner of the car you now have property that may be worth $5K+ less than before the accident, but if you lesase it's the bank that takes the hit. Since I never leased a car, I'm speculating on this point, but I believe it to be true. Maybe those who have read the fine print in their leasing contract can enlighten me as the accuracy of my speculation.
#33
Racer
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Although I was tempted to lease a BMW, I never did so, but I believe that there may be a hidden advantage to leasing. Let's say that your new 997 is involved in an accident, and you for one reason or another can't conclusivly prove that it was the fault of the other driver. For example two cars driving in opposite directions on a country road collide and there are no witnesses. Your Insurance company pays to have your car repaired, but you can't in most cases have them compensate you for diminished vale. So if you are the owner of the car you now have property that may be worth $5K+ less than before the accident, but if you lesase it's the bank that takes the hit. Since I never leased a car, I'm speculating on this point, but I believe it to be true. Maybe those who have read the fine print in their leasing contract can enlighten me as the accuracy of my speculation.