Notices
997 Forum 2005-2012
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Understeering issues with 997S

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-22-2008, 10:21 PM
  #46  
doctorpcar
Instructor
 
doctorpcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RonCT
I want to agree with you, but the facts don't bear it out. If it did, then all Porsche track cars would be AWD. If I remember correctly, this is a complex situation involving the rear weight bias, rear wheel drive, weight distribution, etc. I remember some Porsche Race Team guys explaining it in one of our DE / Racing workshops that you simply can't ask a tire to do more than is possible. Braking and turning is asking for two things, so there's a balance point. Same with turning - and thus turning and acceleration. When you have 295 stickies on the rear of a rear-weight biased car (like the 911) and you are under full throttle exiting a turn, then there's just so much contact patch up front whether the wheels are driven or not.

Also, consider this. Dial in about 2-2.5 degrees of camber up front to erase what Porsche Marketing / Legal took away from Engineering, and you have Zero understeer in a RWD 911.
I believe you're right. It's called the circle of traction. It's explained here:

http://autopedia.com/stuttgart-west/...Physics07.html
Old 02-22-2008, 11:08 PM
  #47  
ECS
Pro
 
ECS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: S. Sweden, back to West Coast in '21
Posts: 569
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Here is my track camber set-up. I would highly recommend it for better tire wear and less understeer. Use GT3 control arms for the front with shims. Total cost about $1,300. I now have -2.5 front and -2.0 in the rear. The GT3 control arms also give a bit of a wider stance in the front making the car more stable. Front toe should be very close to 0 for very good turn in. Makes the car a bit more touchy on the highway but very good turn in. Also, before the GT3 control arms, my front outside edge of the tires were getting eaten up badly. Absolutely a waste of a good tire. Add, GT3 front brake ducts, GT3 seat, harness, harness bar, and neck restraint and I am good to go. Perfect set-up for DD and DEs (my commute to work is short so not worried about wearing my tires out with this set-up.
Old 02-24-2008, 08:57 PM
  #48  
WaltB
Rennlist Member
 
WaltB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: DFW
Posts: 556
Received 129 Likes on 67 Posts
Default

I'm not talking about the difference while tracking the car. The typical turns on a track are not high angle. Here is a test for you. While in your car sitting at a stop, turn the front wheels 40-45 degrees and then hit the gas. How far forward do you go and what turn rate do you estimate you have? If I do the same thing, and I have, the front wheel drive pulls the front end around with minimal scrubbing of the front tires.
Again I am talking about typical road driving situations where the 4 wheel drive gives me capabilities the 2 wheel drive does not. How about making a U-turn as quickly as possible. I can make a smaller min radius turn with the 4 wheel drive if makeing that turn power on in an agressive fashion.
Sure, if you are tracking your car, get the 2 wheel drive. But if you want incredible turning performance on the road, especially on turns greater than 90 degrees the 4 wheel drive offers much more capability.
I've had both cars and in the C4S the high angle off cornering an turn rate is eye watering.
Old 02-24-2008, 09:05 PM
  #49  
RonCT
Moderator
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
RonCT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 4,993
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

This entire thread is all about track driving and understeer... There's simply no situation where AWD is superior to RWD in a Porsche unless you are talking about traction in the snow. As to making a U-turn, the C2S can do it as well if not better than a C4S. Heck, if you want to be extreme, w/ RWD we can leave the front tires sitting pretty much still and have the rear end walk around and do a 180 in half the distance as AWD.
Old 02-24-2008, 09:14 PM
  #50  
mglobe
The Penguin King
Rennlist Member
 
mglobe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Houston
Posts: 9,834
Received 118 Likes on 84 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Alan Smithee
Porsche has virtually eliminated historical lift-throttle oversteer, but 911s have always had steady-state and power-on understeer (big HP and Turbo cars excepted).
I beg to differ on this point. Yes the cars are much more stable than the earlier models, but a lift at the wrong time will most certainly initiate oversteer very quickly. ask me how i know...
Old 02-24-2008, 09:20 PM
  #51  
Mr. Brown
Instructor
 
Mr. Brown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: northern Virginia
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default Racing

Originally Posted by RonCT
This entire thread is all about track driving and understeer... There's simply no situation where AWD is superior to RWD in a Porsche unless you are talking about traction in the snow. As to making a U-turn, the C2S can do it as well if not better than a C4S. Heck, if you want to be extreme, w/ RWD we can leave the front tires sitting pretty much still and have the rear end walk around and do a 180 in half the distance as AWD.
I've done a lot of SCCA races and, in the rain, I would prefer a FWD to RWD any day, and, better than either is AWD.
Mr. B
Old 02-24-2008, 09:59 PM
  #52  
fuenfer
Burning Brakes
 
fuenfer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Darien, CT
Posts: 766
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mr. Brown
I've done a lot of SCCA races and, in the rain, I would prefer a FWD to RWD any day, and, better than either is AWD.
Mr. B
I'd prefer AWD any day on snow, but I'm partial to RWD on dry tarmac.
Old 02-24-2008, 10:00 PM
  #53  
fuenfer
Burning Brakes
 
fuenfer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Darien, CT
Posts: 766
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mglobe
I beg to differ on this point. Yes the cars are much more stable than the earlier models, but a lift at the wrong time will most certainly initiate oversteer very quickly. ask me how i know...
+1. I love how the rear end rotates around nicely at Summit Point (in the Karussel) when I lift just the right amount.
Old 02-24-2008, 10:40 PM
  #54  
lawjdc
Three Wheelin'
 
lawjdc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,257
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by fuenfer
+1. I love how the rear end rotates around nicely at Summit Point (in the Karussel) when I lift just the right amount.
I learned the same thing from David Donahue at the Porsche Driving Experience. It works well on the GT3 also.
Old 02-24-2008, 10:41 PM
  #55  
Mr. Brown
Instructor
 
Mr. Brown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: northern Virginia
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by fuenfer
+1. I love how the rear end rotates around nicely at Summit Point (in the Karussel) when I lift just the right amount.
Summit Point is my home track and, in the dry, RWD is the most fun.
Mr. B
Old 02-24-2008, 11:45 PM
  #56  
Crazy Canuck
Race Director
 
Crazy Canuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 11,183
Received 218 Likes on 108 Posts
Default

When I test drove a Carrera S I also drove a Turbo. Although I liked the acceleration I did not like how heavy it was. The front end felt heavy.

2wd is more fun. AWD understeers more.

RWD for me.
Old 02-25-2008, 11:52 AM
  #57  
drmarkp
Advanced
 
drmarkp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

PASM doesn't help as it makes it harder to load up the front of the car. Understeer is a problem with the GT3 and RS too. Trail braking gets rid of what's left after optimising your geometry - just make sure you do it right!
Old 02-28-2008, 01:47 PM
  #58  
mkk62
Burning Brakes
 
mkk62's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,100
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

ECS
wtih those camber settings with the gt3 control arms what is the toe and total caster? on the alignment..

thanks
thinking of getting those arms too..would get the gt3 control arms first, switch to R compounds (r888's or MPCS ) or do both at the same time?

thanks
Old 02-29-2008, 12:15 AM
  #59  
ECS
Pro
 
ECS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: S. Sweden, back to West Coast in '21
Posts: 569
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

mkk62 - can't remember the caster, but I believe my front toe was 0.02 per wheel. I will be getting a full alignment before Barber on the 8th so I will let you know then.
Old 02-29-2008, 12:17 PM
  #60  
pbarch1
Racer
 
pbarch1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Central California
Posts: 316
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

I had an 89 911 before and I'm telling you tire pressure made such a huge difference in handling I was amazed. I could completely change the car from under to oversteer just by adding a few pounds or taking a few pounds of pressure.


Quick Reply: Understeering issues with 997S



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 06:47 AM.