Monster Eye Candy!
#61
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by lowside67
Anytime, I'm new myself ![Smilie](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
Less than a year in, I shoot with a 30D, 135 f/2L, 17-40 f/4L, 50 f/1.4
![Smilie](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
Less than a year in, I shoot with a 30D, 135 f/2L, 17-40 f/4L, 50 f/1.4
On Topic: Those Kinesis wheels give that Cayman a really mean stance. Nice car.
#62
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Actually honestly I would say that is my least favourite lens of my kit. It takes photos just fine but there's no "wow" in this lens. My favourite by far is my 135 F/2L. FABULOUS lens.
#63
Race Director
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by 951 ABCA
The 17-40L is a brilliant piece of kit.
On Topic: Those Kinesis wheels give that Cayman a really mean stance. Nice car.
On Topic: Those Kinesis wheels give that Cayman a really mean stance. Nice car.
#64
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
17-55 is a great lens for those using 1.6 crop bodies.
I am planning on upgrading to a 5D and did not want to invest in any non future compatible EF-S lenses.
I use a 70-200 F/2.8L that I like a lot.
I am planning on upgrading to a 5D and did not want to invest in any non future compatible EF-S lenses.
I use a 70-200 F/2.8L that I like a lot.
#65
Race Director
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by lowside67
17-55 is a great lens for those using 1.6 crop bodies.
I am planning on upgrading to a 5D and did not want to invest in any non future compatible EF-S lenses.
I use a 70-200 F/2.8L that I like a lot.
I am planning on upgrading to a 5D and did not want to invest in any non future compatible EF-S lenses.
I use a 70-200 F/2.8L that I like a lot.
#66
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Well they are replacing the 30D with the 40D this year, I think the 5D will be one extra year.
Regardless, the price has come WAY down with the rebate program!
Regardless, the price has come WAY down with the rebate program!
#68
Race Director
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by lowside67
Well they are replacing the 30D with the 40D this year, I think the 5D will be one extra year.
Regardless, the price has come WAY down with the rebate program!
Regardless, the price has come WAY down with the rebate program!
#69
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by bet
RedRocket,
Your comments are so true. I really wanted to get a Cayman S when it was released but was hesitant because of the power. I waited and was able to borrow a CS for week. I fell in love with the handling and “tossable” nature of the car. However, while the power was adequate (it is not a slow car) it just lacks the “zig” and “grunt” of a 997S and arguably the 997. Just that little extra torque and hp the 997 offers makes a huge different in daily driving IMO and I knew if I got the CS I would be longing for something different in a year. The irony is Porsche didn’t want to give the Cayman more power because of chance of cannibalization of 911 sales, but I would have bought a new Cayman S for $67k with the options I want if it had more power but I won’t buy a new 997 because the additional cost puts it out of my price range and I will just wait until the 997S falls into my price range on the pre-owned market (or the Cayman depreciates so much that a engine swap becomes attractive).
Your comments are so true. I really wanted to get a Cayman S when it was released but was hesitant because of the power. I waited and was able to borrow a CS for week. I fell in love with the handling and “tossable” nature of the car. However, while the power was adequate (it is not a slow car) it just lacks the “zig” and “grunt” of a 997S and arguably the 997. Just that little extra torque and hp the 997 offers makes a huge different in daily driving IMO and I knew if I got the CS I would be longing for something different in a year. The irony is Porsche didn’t want to give the Cayman more power because of chance of cannibalization of 911 sales, but I would have bought a new Cayman S for $67k with the options I want if it had more power but I won’t buy a new 997 because the additional cost puts it out of my price range and I will just wait until the 997S falls into my price range on the pre-owned market (or the Cayman depreciates so much that a engine swap becomes attractive).
I'm with you on all counts....
#72
Burning Brakes
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 901
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Mark-
Thanks.... and the subject car is moving at what sort of speed?
Hassy h2 here with a leaf 22mp back...... see the results at
stevensivak.com..... but would like to start pointing that monster
at snazzy cars....
Thanks.... and the subject car is moving at what sort of speed?
Hassy h2 here with a leaf 22mp back...... see the results at
stevensivak.com..... but would like to start pointing that monster
at snazzy cars....
#73
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Mind Over Motorsports
The one on the right is my wife of nearly a decade, I'll be sure to let her know.