Notices
997 Forum 2005-2012
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Rev limiter

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-22-2005, 04:58 PM
  #16  
johnfm
Drifting
 
johnfm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Leeds, where I have run into this many lamp
Posts: 2,689
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

have you done some preliminary reading? If not, consider the forces involved in accelerating the piston/conrod assembly. The faster these assemblies move, the greater the forces. With the regards to the valve train, you have valve bounce issues, which can be overcome with changes to valve spring rates.

All the engineering decisions relating to overcoming these issues then boil down to economics - they can easily engineer the engines with stronger, lighter components - but the price of the car then increases and the market narrows - hence limited numbers of highly engineered GT3s and their ilk, and rev limits of 7200 rpm for cars which in the main are used on public roads.

Just my 0.02....
Old 11-23-2005, 02:22 AM
  #17  
Pete Lech
Addict
Rennlist
Lifetime Member

 
Pete Lech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Fullerton, California
Posts: 1,156
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PV
Not necessarily for acceleration, but certainly for top speed. So, the question: what is the ultimate technical reason not to increase the rev limit? Is it valve weight, electronics (can't be), valve lifting pressure, ....?
Essentially, the ultimate reason is that above a certain speed, the recirocating mass will come apart in an undesireable way. For example, in my '85 Carrera, a major limiting factor was the strength of the connecting rod bolts, which tended to stretch over ~7000 rpm. Connecting rods are known to come apart as well, which is why very high revving motors use titanium rods. You hear less about it nowadays, but valves can float above a certain rpm, and could hit the piston if the clearance is very close.
Old 11-23-2005, 10:58 AM
  #18  
PV
Pro
Thread Starter
 
PV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Amsterdam, NL
Posts: 502
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks Pete.

So the M5 is using all the higher tech stuff?

What is more important in the design decision: the valve weight or the oil pressure (spring load)?
Old 11-25-2005, 12:24 PM
  #19  
pcar964
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
pcar964's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 5,225
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Chris C.
For maximum acceleration, you want to shift at the correct rpm such that when you let the clutch out in the new gear you are at peak torque. Divide the 2 gear ratios (i.e. 2nd to 3rd) and multiply by peak torque to find the optimal shoft point in each gear. HINT- It's rarely redline.
\
W R O N G ! ! ! hahaha

For max acceleration, shift at redline. Period. I'm afraid you guys don't know what you're talking about...

As far as "why don't they raise the redline," there are many factors that affect that, but here's the basic idea - redline is the point at which the engine stops making power efficiently, due to its design. You can change the effective "redline" by altering timing, advance, spark, etc... but it's not like they just build the engine and then arbitrarily decide on a redline. They could have designed the engine so that it has a 10,000rpm redline, but it would be peaky and have a much sharper torque curve. Not to mention the cost of strengthening the internals to cope.

But for instance, just because a diesel engine's redline is much lower, doesn't mean it's of inferior quality or technology. It's just the design of that engine that dictates its effective redline. Watch the Audi R10 diesels next year with their much lower redline, as they win races against cars with much higher redlines.

Last edited by pcar964; 11-25-2005 at 12:40 PM.



Quick Reply: Rev limiter



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 04:27 AM.