Notices
997 Forum 2005-2012
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Fuel Economy?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-13-2004, 09:12 PM
  #1  
Baron009
Pro
Thread Starter
 
Baron009's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 516
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Fuel Economy?

Am I missing something or did they really improve the gas mileage on the 911. Check out the numbers.. if they mean anything.

996 Carrera

C: 18 mpg
H: 26 mpg


997 Carrera

C: 17.5 mpg
H: 34.9 mpg


That would be really, really awesome if they managed to improve fuel economy by that much, without reducing power. But how could they do this? Different gearing? Aerodynamics? Engine Advancements?

I'm suprised no one has noticed this yet...
Old 05-13-2004, 10:12 PM
  #2  
Blue S2
Race Car
 
Blue S2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Washington, D.C.
Posts: 4,220
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I actually posted something about that in one of the forums, i think it was the 993 one though...

Yeah, it blows my mind! And knowing Porsche, its most likely understated. I am also assuming the gas tank is at least 22 gallons.

I will make a safe estimate that you can go 900 miles driving relaxed on the highway in a 997. Cross-country trips should be a blast! Thats unbelievable. I know in the 944 we can do a good 700. This new 911 is looking to be quite a package. I cant wait to see what happens with a "power upgrade" package.

Oh yeah, and arent the new Porsches, especially this one like Ultra low emmissions vehicles too? Thats really unbelievable for a sports car of their caliber. Very impressive. Porsche also does a lot for their communities in Germany. What a well mannered company taking care of their people, hte community, and the earth! Lets all buy another Porsche!
Old 05-13-2004, 10:45 PM
  #3  
AeroSmith
Pro
 
AeroSmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Saint Petersburg, FL
Posts: 701
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Hmmmmm...

As the new car is heavier and the city number is lower could it perhaps be a typo? Maybe it's 24.9 highway?
Old 05-13-2004, 10:56 PM
  #4  
Blue S2
Race Car
 
Blue S2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Washington, D.C.
Posts: 4,220
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

How much heavier is the new car? Im betting its not a typo. Porsche has been coming up with all kinds of stuff lately, especially in the area of fuel and emissions.
Old 05-14-2004, 01:19 PM
  #5  
denik
7th Gear
 
denik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

That must be a typo. Going from 26mpg to 35mpg without a fundamental change to the engine (e.g. hybrid) isn't likely to happen.
Old 05-14-2004, 01:31 PM
  #6  
ScottW
Advanced
 
ScottW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It might be Imperial gallon vs US gallon. I think 1 Imperial Gallon ~= 1.2 US Gal.

-Scott
Old 05-14-2004, 04:36 PM
  #7  
sjsharks
Racer
 
sjsharks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Does anybody know if the improved fuel mileage negates the GG Tax?
Old 05-14-2004, 05:51 PM
  #8  
Brett - 1996 C4
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Brett - 1996 C4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Wenatchee, Washington
Posts: 323
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

That would be really, really awesome if they managed to improve fuel economy by that much, without reducing power. But how could they do this? Different gearing? Aerodynamics? Engine Advancements?
One possibility is shutting down cylinders. I've read this is being talked about in the automotive engineering world as a way to get greater fuel economy. For example, I think I read that that 16 cylinder Cadillac engine (that is, if it ever sees the light of day) would be able to shut down multiple cylinders to save fuel.
Old 05-14-2004, 06:10 PM
  #9  
Baron009
Pro
Thread Starter
 
Baron009's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 516
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It has to be a typo, because the Liters/100km on the England site has the same values for both models (8.1l/100km). They must have just made a slip up.
Old 05-14-2004, 07:58 PM
  #10  
Viken
Keeper of the Truth
Lifetime Rennlist
Member

 
Viken's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: So Cal
Posts: 6,486
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Not sure how accurate these figures are:

Old 05-14-2004, 08:50 PM
  #11  
Blue S2
Race Car
 
Blue S2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Washington, D.C.
Posts: 4,220
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ive seen 34 posted everywhere they have talked about this car so far. If its an error, its a big one that needs to be corrected quick. I would hate to see Porsche have to land in a situation like Mazda with the Rx8 and its figures that were overstated.
Old 05-14-2004, 09:02 PM
  #12  
Viken
Keeper of the Truth
Lifetime Rennlist
Member

 
Viken's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: So Cal
Posts: 6,486
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

I just realized that Autospies lifted that table straight from the UK Porsche site. So, those figures may very well be UK gallons. If so, 34.9 would translate to 29 mpg. Still, a pretty good figure.
Old 05-14-2004, 10:00 PM
  #13  
jcnesq
Miserable Old Bastard
Rennlist Member

 
jcnesq's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 14,170
Received 222 Likes on 122 Posts
Default

The German site says the S gets 100km for 8.4l; that works out to 27.98 miles per (US) gallon; and that works out to about 33.6 miles per UK gallon (which is what the chart above states).



Quick Reply: Fuel Economy?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 02:02 PM.