997.2 Are these over revs a concern?
03-08-2019, 10:36 AM
#16
Rennlist Member
03-08-2019, 12:22 PM
#17
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
I agree with the others. It isn’t so much the rev count it is the fact that it literally just had occurred. Someone was beating the **** out of that car on a test drive for the range 1-4. The range 5/6 could have been an actual misshift. Are you sure they ran that properly, it definitely seems strange that it literally had just happened.
03-08-2019, 12:26 PM
#18
TBH, I don’t think you can really mess it up, but those #s so recently make me wonder. With a Durametric you select the car you are scanning, I would think if the selected the wrong car (i.e. C2S vs Turbo) it just wouldn’t read anything at all. I would go with the idea they are correct, it just seems crazy that the car was literally just pounded on 6 minutes earlier.
03-08-2019, 12:47 PM
#19
Three Wheelin'
03-08-2019, 05:09 PM
#21
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Thanks again for all of the quick responses. I compared this report to another DME from a same year, 2009 911 TT, with 25k miles, (this report was from the car with 16k miles) and now I see what everyone means - there was an obvious difference in over revs. The dealer offered me $10k off the car, so $80k to take the car as is. Although tempting I will pass.