Notices
997 Forum 2005-2012
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

$40k: 997.1 S or 997.2 Base?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-05-2018, 09:27 PM
  #16  
Wpgb
Rennlist Member
 
Wpgb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 121
Received 35 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Fined
Of course not. A tremendous amount of what gets posted here is fully unsubstantiated info based solely on the car a person owns. To 997.1 owners there is a lot of talk about "why get a 997.2".. to manual gearbox owners its "a PDK is so unreliable" (even though there are almost daily threads about clutch problems)... to Turbo owners.. the mezger engine is the be all end all...

It's just a whole circle jerk of "what I have is objectively better than what you have" even though it really only reflects on keeping yourself happy about how you spent your money, and not objective info at all.
Well said, dude...hilarious
Old 06-05-2018, 09:40 PM
  #17  
swingwing
Pro
 
swingwing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Arlington, Texas
Posts: 657
Received 93 Likes on 70 Posts
Default

OP, don’t write off the 996, There’s plenty out there that have the IMS taken care of. IMO as a Porsche noob the IMS issue is overblown in the 997.1. However I admit in my own hunt I wanted a 997.2 in order to get the 9A1 engine. $40K is short money on a 997.2 unless it’s high miles (say 80K+).



Last edited by swingwing; 06-05-2018 at 09:43 PM. Reason: Added wording.
Old 06-05-2018, 09:41 PM
  #18  
Carsly
Racer
 
Carsly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Princeton, NJ
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

there is always data available. but for every source presented there will be someone to disqualify that source because their neighbor's cousin's brother's monkey's uncle just bought a Carrera GT with 11 miles on it for $5,600 because the battery was dead.

https://www.hagerty.com/apps/valuati...he-911-carrera
Old 06-05-2018, 10:13 PM
  #19  
LISsailor
Pro
 
LISsailor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 640
Received 191 Likes on 85 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Carsly
Similar budget a few years ago. After carefully evaluating the 997's I ended up going for...wait for it...a 996TT. It feels lighter, more nimble, fewer electronic ninnies, and breathtakingly quick when the Turbos kick in. Also doesn't hurt that they are going up in value as opposed to 997's which are still going down.

The answer is always Turbo.
I definitely had a chuckle from the poster above stating we are substantiating our own purchases. For me, the answer was to “avoid a turbo at all costs”, since every Porsche from now on will be a “Turbo”. That’s why I went with a N/A.
Old 06-05-2018, 10:41 PM
  #20  
mercman
Instructor
 
mercman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

I was debating the very same decision -- ended up with a 2010 997.2 base, just arrived yesterday. So far, proving to be a great decision.
Old 06-05-2018, 11:29 PM
  #21  
Balr14
Burning Brakes
 
Balr14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Menomonee Falls, WI.
Posts: 1,190
Received 166 Likes on 112 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Fined
Of course not. A tremendous amount of what gets posted here is fully unsubstantiated info based solely on the car a person owns. To 997.1 owners there is a lot of talk about "why get a 997.2".. to manual gearbox owners its "a PDK is so unreliable" (even though there are almost daily threads about clutch problems)... to Turbo owners.. the mezger engine is the be all end all...

It's just a whole circle jerk of "what I have is objectively better than what you have" even though it really only reflects on keeping yourself happy about how you spent your money, and not objective info at all.
Thank you! The favorite game here seems to be "Rationalize your purchase".
Old 06-06-2018, 09:30 AM
  #22  
Blue997_1
Advanced
 
Blue997_1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

I paid $43k for my 997.1 Carrera 2 base, one owner car with low miles... do you really think you can get a 997.2 for $40k? I suppose if you were okay with really high miles or accidents you could do it.

Last edited by Blue997_1; 06-06-2018 at 09:46 AM.
Old 06-06-2018, 09:42 AM
  #23  
sloanfiske
5th Gear
 
sloanfiske's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

997.2

No question. All day long. I bought a 997.2 with 57k and PDK for under 40k with from a non-Porsche but factory luxury car dealer who had taken the car as a trade in and addressed any issues the PCar dealer PPI found, did the 60k service, put on new tires, and other routine maintenance before I purchased. I got a remarkable deal considering the cost of all the work that was done to the car to close the deal. I'm imagining the dealer made money wrapping the trade-in to the other purchase and a few dollars from me.

That said, I've been looking for 2 years for the right car to come along based on a budget. Expected to land in either late 996 or 997.1.. I asked the right questions and assumed little. Put down a deposit under conditions and while the PPI/work was being done. Then bought a plane ticket and drove the car 1000 miles home.
Old 06-06-2018, 09:45 AM
  #24  
OnlineAlias
Rennlist Member
 
OnlineAlias's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Indianapolis Indiana
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

The specs of 997.1 "S" and 997.2 Base are nearly identical. In a manual, a 997.2 is also pretty much bulletproof and in the long term will be known as one of the most desirable and durable 911's of all time.

The 997.1 is a great driving car, but will always have that "stigma", whether it is deserved or not.
Old 06-06-2018, 09:49 AM
  #25  
Bruce In Philly
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
Bruce In Philly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 5,991
Likes: 0
Received 1,420 Likes on 862 Posts
Default

2009 C2S 125K miles

Specs of a base are near identical to an S and both are world-class sports cars. I always felt the suspension shock/spring dynamics of the base are really well sorted over PASM that uses shocks to do many things. Ss are always more desirable in the market simply because more is better in consumer minds and that is where companies really rake the emotional over the coals..... Anywho..... that is just the way it works.

BTW: I would never buy a car with that older engine design... flame away if you want to, but regardless of what you think of the older engine, the new 9A1 DFI engine is turning out to be fabulously rugged... and that adds up in real dollars over time.

Peace
Bruce in Philly
Old 06-06-2018, 12:14 PM
  #26  
amplitude
Instructor
 
amplitude's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 127
Received 55 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

When I was searching for my car, I specifically wanted a base 997.2 C2 with as few of options as possible; things like suspension, exhaust, etc. are items I'd address anyways, so to me, there was no point in paying more for those things from the start just to end up replacing them. I also wanted a car that had some miles on it... I wanted to know that it had seen some road time and that old, stagnant fluids and dried out seals from a car that had been sitting all it's life in a garage wouldn't be a problem. Again... These were important requirements to me, but may not fit someone else's list of requirements or criteria.

The decision really comes down to what you want from the car. Everyone has different reasons or expectations in a purchase like this. Drive the different variations between .1 and .2 and see which speaks to you most for what your preference is. Drive some 996s, 991s... Maybe what you're really after isn't even in the 997 family. People always comment on how everyone tries to justify their purchase like it's making an excuse for settling on something that's perceived as inferior (like a base); the only person you need to justify your decision with is yourself, so be sure to get the car that puts a smile on your face (you'll know it when you find it). In my mind, there is no bad Porsche; just different flavors to suit different tastes.
Old 06-06-2018, 01:32 PM
  #27  
Blu311
Burning Brakes
 
Blu311's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 1,174
Received 24 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

I agree with most here, 997.2.

But for a max budget of $40k, you are likely looking at a higher mileage example.

Good luck!
Old 06-06-2018, 02:30 PM
  #28  
Darkhorse
Rennlist Member
 
Darkhorse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 327
Received 91 Likes on 42 Posts
Default

No question, 997.2 base. There are hundreds of reasons to buy a .2 over a .1. Pick the ones that mean the most to you and don't look back.
Old 06-06-2018, 04:53 PM
  #29  
GT3_ISH
Instructor
 
GT3_ISH's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Florida
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I must be in the minority here. I actually prefer the exterior aesthetics of the 997.1 over the .2. This was only amplified in my eyes because I knew I was going to purchase the aero kit components.
Old 06-06-2018, 08:52 PM
  #30  
1crazy canuck
Racer
 
1crazy canuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 301
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Go with the 997.1 S - cleaner aesthetics, bigger engine. And I would try to find a low mile example..


Quick Reply: $40k: 997.1 S or 997.2 Base?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 11:44 PM.