Notices
996 Turbo Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

self driving

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-10-2015, 07:20 PM
  #31  
rmc1148
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
rmc1148's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Lancaster Pa
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Thank you Dock for articulating more clearly than myself=agree.
Old 09-10-2015, 07:44 PM
  #32  
Carlo_Carrera
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
Carlo_Carrera's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Nearby
Posts: 10,731
Received 2,236 Likes on 1,442 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rmc1148
Carlo from location Nearby Randy from Kirkwood Pa just disagrees with you.
Don't be gloomy Randy. I am just trying to cheer you up. If I am wrong about the future feel free to remind me of it every day in that future.

I will leave you with this. A hundred years ago the main mode of transportation was the horse. Cars replaced the horse but the horse didn't disappear. People who love horses still have them, enjoy them, and ride them. It will be the same way with human driven cars in the future. You will still be able to drive it and enjoy it. Maybe even more than you do now because it will become a very special experience. Something to be savored.
Old 09-10-2015, 07:53 PM
  #33  
Carlo_Carrera
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
Carlo_Carrera's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Nearby
Posts: 10,731
Received 2,236 Likes on 1,442 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dock
It has not been proven on a large scale.



I also follow this technology closely, because the biggest issue in the end will be an overreach by government; mandatory use of these vehicles (if not everywhere, then certainly in metropolitan areas). This will be couched as the government managing "safety", when in fact it is none of their business. The erosion of freedom will continue. The dumbing down of citizens will continue.

Of course the legal issues are also very important, as the determination of who is liable when there are accidents (and there will be) will have to be determined. Will it be the occupant of the vehicle, or will it be the manufacturer? Will the government be liable when the GPS constellation doesn't provide the required ANP performance? If the occupant of the vehicle is judged liable and charged (it could be a charge of vehicular homicide if there is a fatality) then people will start taking more interest in what the vehicle is doing to avoid these risks, instead of watching TV, goofing off, or being hammered (there can't be any driving under the influence when you aren't actually driving the vehicle). If they are therefore going to pay attention, then why not actually drive the vehicle themselves?
Just like other cutting edge technologies it has been proven well enough to start wider implementation.

As for the other stuff you laid out. The insurance companies have already worked this out. If an accident occurs with an autonomous vehicle liability lies complete within the autonomous technology. The human occupant is not liable nor is a spotty GPS signal. Are the tech companies worried? Not in the least. They know what they are building works and will work better better than the average human at the wheel.
Old 09-10-2015, 07:57 PM
  #34  
Dock
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
Dock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Posts: 12,131
Received 766 Likes on 543 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Carlo_Carrera
The insurance companies have already worked this out. If an accident occurs with an autonomous vehicle liability lies complete within the autonomous technology.
It's not the insurance companies I'm talking about. It's the Courts.
Old 09-10-2015, 07:57 PM
  #35  
Carlo_Carrera
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
Carlo_Carrera's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Nearby
Posts: 10,731
Received 2,236 Likes on 1,442 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dock
You must not have kids.
I don't have kids but I have many close nieces and nephews and they see day to day driving just as I do. A needless chore.
Old 09-10-2015, 08:01 PM
  #36  
Carlo_Carrera
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
Carlo_Carrera's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Nearby
Posts: 10,731
Received 2,236 Likes on 1,442 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dock
It's not the insurance companies I'm talking about. It's the Courts.
The courts are already lining up the same way as the insurance company. The courts have vast experience with technology law suits already. The autonomy tech companies are not worried in the least.
Old 09-10-2015, 08:04 PM
  #37  
Dock
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
Dock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Posts: 12,131
Received 766 Likes on 543 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Carlo_Carrera
The courts are already lining up the same way as the insurance company.
Then you're not keeping up with the legal challenges...and civil court will present even greater challenges.
Old 09-10-2015, 08:08 PM
  #38  
Dock
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
Dock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Posts: 12,131
Received 766 Likes on 543 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Carlo_Carrera
I don't have kids but I have many close nieces and nephews and they see day to day driving just as I do. A needless chore.
It's not the driving that I was alluding to, it was the erosion of privacy and freedom. Sitting around and opining that you or others won't be alive when certain things come to fruition just means you really don't care about the future of others or this country. Having kids has a way of making one think more about these things.
Old 09-10-2015, 08:14 PM
  #39  
Carlo_Carrera
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
Carlo_Carrera's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Nearby
Posts: 10,731
Received 2,236 Likes on 1,442 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dock
Then you're not keeping up with the legal challenges...and civil court will present even greater challenges.
I am very well aware of what has been going on in the courts with regards to this technology. As I wrote earlier. I put my money where mouth is and your doom and gloom forecast is completely unprecedented and unfounded.

I have said all I can say about this and I am very willing to deal with what the future will bring when that future actually begins. How you want to deal with it is up to you.
Old 09-10-2015, 08:17 PM
  #40  
Carlo_Carrera
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
Carlo_Carrera's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Nearby
Posts: 10,731
Received 2,236 Likes on 1,442 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dock
It's not the driving that I was alluding to, it was the erosion of privacy and freedom. Sitting around and opining that you or others won't be alive when certain things come to fruition just means you really don't care about the future of others or this country. Having kids has a way of making one think more about these things.
Don't give me this BS angle about me not caring because I don't have children. Bye bye.
Old 09-10-2015, 08:20 PM
  #41  
Dock
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
Dock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Posts: 12,131
Received 766 Likes on 543 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Carlo_Carrera
I am very well aware of what has been going on in the courts with regards to this technology.
It hasn't been challenged in the courts yet by people who are facing legal liability for the actions of a piece of machinery that they are not in control of.
Old 09-10-2015, 08:23 PM
  #42  
Dock
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
Dock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Posts: 12,131
Received 766 Likes on 543 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Carlo_Carrera
Don't give me this BS angle about me not caring because I don't have children.
I didn't say you didn't care because you didn't have kids, I said "Having kids has a way of making one think more about these things".
Old 09-10-2015, 10:05 PM
  #43  
leftlane
Rennlist Member
 
leftlane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Deep in the Heart of Texas
Posts: 2,336
Received 418 Likes on 285 Posts
Default

I enjoy driving of all kinds and I abhor more government involvement in my life. Don't kid yourself - the more we allow the government to dictate everything to us, the less freedom we have, and the more cost we will absorb. See healthcare as a perfect example happening in real time right in front of us.

Plenty of people will think it's a great idea. Plenty of people also thought communism was a viable form of government.
Old 09-10-2015, 11:14 PM
  #44  
"02996ttx50
Banned
 
"02996ttx50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 6,522
Received 25 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rmc1148
Anyone that thinks this and other very intrusive mandatory requirements aren't coming obviously do not read the news.
exactly, beyond 1148 i strongly suspect that many of you are incapable of taking the long view of what this portends.

this isn;t about :"safety" per se!! it's about black boxes and "control grids" and license plate reading tech, and the elimination of human discretionary freedoms that many of us are old enough to remember.

but i notice daily an inability of the group here, and elsewhere in the real world a diminishing ability to exercise basic critical thinking skills. blame the schools hah.

so sure, self parking or lane change auto pilot is seen as "progress".

whatever, we're all a doomed group. you guys should look up the ramifications of our currently debated CA state resolution ab 350 http://focus.senate.ca.gov/climate

i'm positive the majority here have no idea exactly how this will impact us all. real time black box reporting of your SPEED, trajectory, gasoline usage, etc etc. oh thank you great leaders for helping me save gas lol. while oil is sitting at 42 a barrel. sheesh.

as goes CA, so goes the rest of the country. enjoy it while you can. driving, that is.
Old 09-10-2015, 11:17 PM
  #45  
"02996ttx50
Banned
 
"02996ttx50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 6,522
Received 25 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by leftlane
Plenty of people will think it's a great idea. Plenty of people also thought communism was a viable form of government.
exactly, and they'd be idiots. i favor margaret thatcher's take on socialism. to wit:

"the only thing wrong with socialism, is that eventually you run out of other people's money".


Quick Reply: self driving



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:20 PM.