Notices
996 Turbo Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Tanner Foust's '01 996TT

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-17-2012, 02:55 AM
  #16  
Angelus
Instructor
 
Angelus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Lanark, Scotland
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Carlo_Carrera
996TT prices are being dragged down by the engine issues in the 996 non-turbo Carrera cars.
I think the 996 is following the depreciation curve of every other Porsche before it, and the 997 is right behind it.
Old 09-17-2012, 08:33 AM
  #17  
John McM
Rennlist Member
 
John McM's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Auckland, New Zealand.
Posts: 13,249
Received 589 Likes on 351 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Angelus
I think the 996 is following the depreciation curve of every other Porsche before it, and the 997 is right behind it.
Not all those before it, my Turbo 3.6 had a 20% dip in the years after I bought it but is close to the nominal price I paid in 2001.

As for the M96 issues. I bought the 996 TT because research showed it doesn't have the same engine.
Old 09-17-2012, 10:24 AM
  #18  
JG 996T
Rennlist Member
 
JG 996T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 3,181
Received 529 Likes on 287 Posts
Default

6 turbo market remains flat at $40-60 (which is where it was 2.5 years ago when I bought mine).
7.1 turbo market is about $70-90.
Supply and demand dictates price.
Porsche made a lot of these cars and continues to make the 7.2 turbo.

964 turbo, 993 turbo, 911 turbo are totally different markets (and I have no knowledge of values).
Old 09-17-2012, 01:46 PM
  #19  
Kevinmacd
Rennlist Member
 
Kevinmacd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: SE Florida
Posts: 2,740
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Yeah hard to believe the M96 would have any inflluence against the turbo engine!
Old 09-17-2012, 02:49 PM
  #20  
uschoice
Rennlist Member
 
uschoice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 341
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=Dock;9846213]It amazes me that Turbo owners are so willing to encourage buyers to essentially low ball the car they are considering. All the Turbo owners are doing is shooting themselves in the foot regarding the value of their own Turbos./QUOTE]

Makes no sense to me either. Most every one of us, at some time, will sell our car, and I'm sure most will want to get top dollar for it.
Old 09-17-2012, 03:25 PM
  #21  
litsout996t
Intermediate
 
litsout996t's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: hornell n.y
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i Paid 56k for my 2003 turbo with 14k miles on it and some very nice add ons Including kw coilovers, oz ultraleggra rims with brand new ps2's, full 3m clear bra, complete alpine stereo, epl 1.2 bar tune. I feel I got a good deal. What do you think?
Old 09-17-2012, 04:05 PM
  #22  
Byron in MS
Instructor
 
Byron in MS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

A "good" deal is in the eye of the beholder! If you are satisfied and happy with your car, then I agree! I got my '01 for considerably less than that, but it had been wrecked and repaired. There are those who would never have a "junk" car like mine, but I am perfectly happy with it, particularly on track days!
Old 09-17-2012, 04:49 PM
  #23  
Savetheclutch
Instructor
 
Savetheclutch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Angelus
Is that you Tanner?
lol I wish I had his job
Old 09-17-2012, 05:32 PM
  #24  
Angelus
Instructor
 
Angelus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Lanark, Scotland
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Savetheclutch
lol I wish I had his job
At least you have the same taste in cars.
Old 09-17-2012, 09:46 PM
  #25  
PoloTurbo
Instructor
 
PoloTurbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Montréal, Québec
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I've had offers for straight trade for my 930 in Canada.

Already tried the 996tt from a friend and really liked it. At that time was racing a 1997 dsm.
After a few pulls in the 996tt with my wife she said, isn't your car a lot faster? Lol. At that time it was in the 1/4 mile.

I ask my wife if a 996tt would be nice. She said, that ugly car? Is that a boxster...

I really don't care and think the 996tt is the best money can buy.
Old 09-18-2012, 08:58 AM
  #26  
Carlo_Carrera
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Carlo_Carrera's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Nearby
Posts: 11,152
Received 2,486 Likes on 1,569 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Kevinmacd
Yeah hard to believe the M96 would have any inflluence against the turbo engine!
It is hard to believe but it does. I remember watching an old episode of Top Gear and Clarkson was reviewing a C4S with a factory Turbo look aero kit and one of things he said about it was that it had the same 3.6 engine as the Turbo just without the turbos.

People just don't know it is a completely different engine.

The headlights also play a role, many people just don't like them.
Old 09-18-2012, 10:23 AM
  #27  
Dock
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
Dock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Posts: 12,144
Received 773 Likes on 548 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Carlo_Carrera
It is hard to believe but it does.

...People just don't know it is a completely different engine.
So you have data that indicates this lack of knowledge has caused the price of 996 Turbos to be dragged down? Please post it.
Old 09-18-2012, 11:28 AM
  #28  
rmc1148
Drifting
 
rmc1148's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Lancaster Pa
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

I do not have data but do believe some people put no effort into the buying process and would assume the engine problems are across the board.Also believe its the sheep mentality of I do not like the headlights because they are different attitude, I like them lol.I have no data lol but believe most Porsche buyers are short time owner/buyers and think of reasale as a high priority.
Old 09-18-2012, 12:22 PM
  #29  
dhahlen
Rennlist Member
 
dhahlen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: AZ
Posts: 325
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

From a buyer perspective, I hope the prices keep dropping, maybe I'll teach my wife to drive stick and get her own 996tt, lol.

When I sold my white x50, the market was fairly lower than it is now. Had I waited another year, I could have sold it for 5-7k more. However, I did pick up my current 996tt for a good price, granted it had a bit more miles, but it had some modifications that I appreciate.

I educated myself on the engine differences (RMS failures in the non-turbos), and researched the boards before hopping into my first one. What I will say is, the 996tt has been better to me than any car I've owned that's performed at a similar level.
Old 09-18-2012, 12:56 PM
  #30  
Carlo_Carrera
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Carlo_Carrera's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Nearby
Posts: 11,152
Received 2,486 Likes on 1,569 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dock
So you have data that indicates this lack of knowledge has caused the price of 996 Turbos to be dragged down? Please post it.
The only data I have is prices for 993s are comparably higher as are prices for 997.1s.

I also spoke with a very experienced long time used Porsche dealer who told me he will not touch a first generation non-turbo 996 because "they are terrible cars and nobody wants them". He then went on to recommend the 996TTs because their values were depressed by the non-turbo 996s and the unconventional headlights.

Based on this conversation and some other research I bought a 996TT (not from the dealer I spoke with but from a private seller) and am totally happy with it.


Quick Reply: Tanner Foust's '01 996TT



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:29 AM.