Question and concerns about running 19" wheels.
#16
Great old thread and GreggT (the last post) really addressed my concern. Bottom line: "".... the general rule of thumb (per "AWD, PSM, ABS) is that the front is within 3% of the back. Some call it 'running diameter' but it's circumference.""
I am going with 997 Turbo wheels, 245/35 F and 305/30 R They will be at 1.85% difference. I think that with the +56 offset on the front wheels I will be good to go. I am also running X73 suspension so I should have better clearance.
Unless I hear differently, I will let you know how it goes when I order them next week. BTW, 2004 turbo.
eric
I am going with 997 Turbo wheels, 245/35 F and 305/30 R They will be at 1.85% difference. I think that with the +56 offset on the front wheels I will be good to go. I am also running X73 suspension so I should have better clearance.
Unless I hear differently, I will let you know how it goes when I order them next week. BTW, 2004 turbo.
eric
#17
Burning Brakes
Great old thread and GreggT (the last post) really addressed my concern. Bottom line: "".... the general rule of thumb (per "AWD, PSM, ABS) is that the front is within 3% of the back. Some call it 'running diameter' but it's circumference.""
I am going with 997 Turbo wheels, 245/35 F and 305/30 R They will be at 1.85% difference. I think that with the +56 offset on the front wheels I will be good to go. I am also running X73 suspension so I should have better clearance.
Unless I hear differently, I will let you know how it goes when I order them next week. BTW, 2004 turbo.
eric
I am going with 997 Turbo wheels, 245/35 F and 305/30 R They will be at 1.85% difference. I think that with the +56 offset on the front wheels I will be good to go. I am also running X73 suspension so I should have better clearance.
Unless I hear differently, I will let you know how it goes when I order them next week. BTW, 2004 turbo.
eric
The stock 996TT sizes are 25.1" front and 25.0" rear; with 829 and 832 revolutions per mile/
here is the key: this means the differential needs to compensate for only 3 revs/mile (832-829=3)
The sizes you propose are 25.8 and 26.3 inches, and 807 and 788 rev/mile.
The delta is 19 revs per mile. 600% more than stock, the diff will be revolving 6 times the speed of the stock set up.
Oh, and 19/788 is 2.4%, well past the 3/829 or 0.36% the stock set up runs
997TT sizes on a 996TT are a no-no.
Report back in 10k miles....
A
PS My calcs are based on PS2s...sizes vary with specific brands, so it may be off
#18
Nobody I've read in the last 3 years of posts here and on 6speed recommends those sizes. The 3% posted I have no idea where that was pulled from!
The stock 996TT sizes are 25.1" front and 25.0" rear; with 829 and 832 revolutions per mile/
here is the key: this means the differential needs to compensate for only 3 revs/mile (832-829=3)
The sizes you propose are 25.8 and 26.3 inches, and 807 and 788 rev/mile.
The delta is 19 revs per mile. 600% more than stock, the diff will be revolving 6 times the speed of the stock set up.
Oh, and 19/788 is 2.4%, well past the 3/829 or 0.36% the stock set up runs
997TT sizes on a 996TT are a no-no.
Report back in 10k miles....
A
PS My calcs are based on PS2s...sizes vary with specific brands, so it may be off
The stock 996TT sizes are 25.1" front and 25.0" rear; with 829 and 832 revolutions per mile/
here is the key: this means the differential needs to compensate for only 3 revs/mile (832-829=3)
The sizes you propose are 25.8 and 26.3 inches, and 807 and 788 rev/mile.
The delta is 19 revs per mile. 600% more than stock, the diff will be revolving 6 times the speed of the stock set up.
Oh, and 19/788 is 2.4%, well past the 3/829 or 0.36% the stock set up runs
997TT sizes on a 996TT are a no-no.
Report back in 10k miles....
A
PS My calcs are based on PS2s...sizes vary with specific brands, so it may be off
My ratio is better than stock factory 997T ??
Please explain again - one of us is not getting it?
Thanks, eric
Last edited by bernocco930S; 11-28-2010 at 04:42 AM.
#19
Remember the 996TT and the 997TT use different differentials. The 997 is capable of handling a much larger difference in tire circumference front to rear. So, we can't compare what the 997 has vs the 996.
Most folks will tell you to maintain within 1% to avoid killing the viscous coupler. The Tire Rack personnel will tell you within 4%. I know I don't feel like finding out how far I can push it.
I'm running 235/40-19s and 305/30-19s in Bridgestone RE050As. They are 790 and 792 revs per mile respectively.
Joel
2005 996TTS
1993 968
Most folks will tell you to maintain within 1% to avoid killing the viscous coupler. The Tire Rack personnel will tell you within 4%. I know I don't feel like finding out how far I can push it.
I'm running 235/40-19s and 305/30-19s in Bridgestone RE050As. They are 790 and 792 revs per mile respectively.
Joel
2005 996TTS
1993 968
#20
Burning Brakes
Well, what kinda' dispels your theory on the thing is that the stock 997T uses F: 235/35-19 (816 R/Mi) and R: 305/30-19R (791 R/Mi) and I am proposing F: 245/35-19 (806 R/Mi)
My ratio is better than stock factory 997T ??
Please explain again - one of us is not getting it?
Thanks, eric
My ratio is better than stock factory 997T ??
Please explain again - one of us is not getting it?
Thanks, eric
Just like running 997 sizes on a 996 will stress the 996 diff, running the same size front and rear on a 997 will stress the 997 diff.
If tirerack puts in in writing and tells you they'll cover the diff failure, go with their recommendation....
#21
Remember the 996TT and the 997TT use different differentials. The 997 is capable of handling a much larger difference in tire circumference front to rear. So, we can't compare what the 997 has vs the 996.
Most folks will tell you to maintain within 1% to avoid killing the viscous coupler. The Tire Rack personnel will tell you within 4%. I know I don't feel like finding out how far I can push it.
I'm running 235/40-19s and 305/30-19s in Bridgestone RE050As. They are 790 and 792 revs per mile respectively.
Joel
2005 996TTS
1993 968
Most folks will tell you to maintain within 1% to avoid killing the viscous coupler. The Tire Rack personnel will tell you within 4%. I know I don't feel like finding out how far I can push it.
I'm running 235/40-19s and 305/30-19s in Bridgestone RE050As. They are 790 and 792 revs per mile respectively.
Joel
2005 996TTS
1993 968
That other guy with the 600% different than stock and 6 times faster spinning worried about the diff's and soforth just did not make any sense to me.
I am the first to admit that I am not very up on these cars but I have built/raced/won road racing championships throughout my life and after awhile you aquire some basic common senses about machines. I have always pushed the envelope with my cars and seemed to come out all right. In fact, there have been some that have even used my ideas.....
Maybe I just have a RedNeck mentality!
#23
Burning Brakes
It was pretty basic and straightforward, but I guess you need to understand how a differential works.
Note that Joel's sizes are within 2 revs per mile of perfect- a precise match of the 996TT stock application. Yours are way off.
Are you going to track this? Let us know how it works out. Surely replacing a diff is not going to be a big deal if you've been racing and winning so much.
#24
From personal experience, if you want 19s just stick with the correct size you will see everywhere. 235/35 and 315/25. I have been through all sorts of PSM ABS stuff running the wrong size 19s due to the previous owners wheel choice. Now run the above size PS2 on BBS CH-Rs 8.5 front 12 rear and couldn't be happier. Zero rubbing, electronics back to normal (no lasting damage to the diff) and couldn't be happier.. Why go with any other tyre size on 19s is the question...
#25
As far as my tire deal...... I am taking PWENGLAND's lead and although I cannot find the 315/25's, I am changing the sizes to equal the same numerical differential he has with his combo (7)....... let's wait and see. I pick them up today. I do appreciate the feedback and ideas. Nuff Said.