Notices
996 Turbo Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

"aggressive" street alignment numbers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-03-2007, 09:12 PM
  #1  
Mikelly
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Mikelly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,602
Received 156 Likes on 71 Posts
Default "aggressive" street alignment numbers

Guys, I'm running OEM tires on the street and Michelin Pilot sport cups on the track with PSS9s. I want to drive this car on the street and at the track... What are REASONABLE alignment specs I can take to my shop for an alignment???

Mike
Old 07-03-2007, 11:11 PM
  #2  
Acropora
Burning Brakes
 
Acropora's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,120
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

I've been running -2 camber, going to -2.5 soon.
Old 07-04-2007, 02:37 AM
  #3  
Kerry
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Kerry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: IL
Posts: 374
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Unless you have camber plates, you won't be able to get more than ~ -1 camber in the front; even that much requires a lowered car. So go with max negative camber up front. In the rear you can get as much negative camber as you want. Steely-eyed track men run with even camber all around. I run a 1 deg differential between front & back. With my current setup that means -1 up front and -2 rear. -2 or -2.5 is generally accepted as the limit for reasonable street use/tire wear. I ran -1.5 in the rear for years and had little inside wear, within the lifespan of these tires, which isn't long. But, I was running auto-x on my street tires and that tends to keep the wear even and the lifespan of the tires very short. Now at -2 in the rear I'm seeing more inside wear. Combine that with the fact that I auto-x half the time on race rubber, and I'll probably be swapping the rears. Since the tires are directional that means mounting them inside out. With the fronts at -1 I still see no appreciable inside wear.
Old 07-05-2007, 10:20 AM
  #4  
GreggT
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
GreggT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 1,842
Received 50 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

There are different approaches........with street/bling 19" rubber at $1600 a set I stay 1.5 to 1.7 in rear and as Kerry said, about 1 less in front.
If you have track wheels and good R compound (like Mich SC you mentioned) for the track....I think it's the best of both worlds. More negative will definately cost you (more often) down the street. You would have to be the judge of whether it's worth it on the track......for me, know.
Also, besides the cost of street 19s, I'm not nuts about increasing the frequency of times those rims are in the shop......stuff happens, and it's a pain dealing with wheel repair-refinish.
Old 07-05-2007, 10:30 AM
  #5  
Y65MPH
Pro
 
Y65MPH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NJ
Posts: 661
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

On my 996TT I run -2 rear and -2.5 front (with camber plates). Car has H&R suspension running 19" wheels.
Old 07-06-2007, 08:14 AM
  #6  
Mikelly
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Mikelly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,602
Received 156 Likes on 71 Posts
Default

The car has PSS9s and is lowered substantially, and is running 18 inch wheels... I'm not concerned as much with tire wear as I'm not driving more than 8K miles per year on the street.

Mike
Old 07-06-2007, 09:53 AM
  #7  
TT Surgeon
Race Director
 
TT Surgeon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: KC ex pat marooned in NY
Posts: 13,005
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

With the X73 I had -1.5 fr and -2.0 rear, without camber plates. Ran like a scalded assed ape at the glen with cups, 2:15-2:20's all day long with a NA 996 C4S/aerokit.
Old 07-07-2007, 01:37 AM
  #8  
Dr. T
Instructor
 
Dr. T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Bothell, WA
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Here's the settings I have for the X-73. I've been extremely happy with this.

Left front: Camber -1.0 Right Front: Camber -1.3
Caster 7.7 Caster 7.6
Toe 0.02 Toe 0.02


Front: Cross Camber 0.3
Cross Caster 0.1
Total Toe 0.04
Set Back 0.31


Left Rear: Camber -1.6 Right Rear: Camber -1.6
Toe 0.07 Toe 0.09

Total Toe 0.16
Thrust angle -0.01
Old 07-07-2007, 07:29 AM
  #9  
Jean
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member

 
Jean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 5,450
Received 173 Likes on 104 Posts
Default

Mikelly, in my opinion anything less than -2 deg camber all around is useless for the track. The likes of Manthey Racing use -2.3 Fr and -2.1 Rear for the street /occasional 'Ring setups, while -2.5 Fr and -2.3 Rear is for a bit more hardcore street/drivers.

Less camber in the front than rear and much lower tire pressures front vs rear, is the lawsuit-free, Porsche way of keeping some understeer as an added safety for their customers. When you want to do some performance driving, all of that is a major handicap to decent fast handling.....IMO



Quick Reply: "aggressive" street alignment numbers



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 08:49 PM.