Notices
996 Turbo Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Stock 2002 Gt2 Dyno Results

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-01-2006, 05:08 PM
  #1  
9Eleven
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
9Eleven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Melbourne Beach, Fl
Posts: 1,793
Received 61 Likes on 47 Posts
Default Stock 2002 Gt2 Dyno Results

TPC in Jessup, Md ran her on the dyno for me. It was about 65 degrees and low humidity. I couldn't believe these numbers either. I felt like a proud father. That's HP to the wheels. Mike Levitas, who won the Rolex 24 hours at Daytona in a Gt3 predicted 440 hp. He was right on. He told me stock Gt3's normally pull 355 to 360 hp to the wheels, so he wasn't surprised that a 2 pulled 444. The numbers are corrected for air temp, humidity, elevation and some other variables I'm not sure of, it's a pretty nice dyno. Uncorrected the numbers were higher, 460 plus I think. But those numbers are not accurate.

We conducted a few more runs an hour or so later and she consistantly pulled 435 to 440, so I believe the numbers are as accurate as can be, short of a trap speed. As for modifying it, just going to flash the ECU for now. I'm hoping for an additional 60 to 70 horse to the wheels. Taking it one mod at a time. Put on some lower rear tow arms and that made a huge difference in stability and how straight the car tracks. The best 450 dollars I ever spent.
Attached Images  
Old 10-01-2006, 05:15 PM
  #2  
GTi35R
Intermediate
 
GTi35R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Danville, PA
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Very nice numbers. With a chip intake and exhaust, it seems like its the total package for any car that is beefed up with the K24 from the factory.

What do stock 996 TT put out to the wheels?
Old 10-01-2006, 06:00 PM
  #3  
tkerrmd
Rennlist Member
 
tkerrmd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: tampa florida
Posts: 3,975
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

420hp stock TT, 450hp X-50 flywheel
Old 10-01-2006, 10:22 PM
  #4  
Woodster
Drifting
 
Woodster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: WEST SIDE OF MPLS, MN
Posts: 2,628
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

or 415 and 444. Close enough.

Good job on the dyno, you have a fabulous car.

By the way, I am dead even down a mile long straightaway with a stock GT2 (has a fabspeed)
I have little k-16 turbos PSI 480 kit, PSI quiet exhuast, diverter valves, BMC air filter.
they are identical rolling acceleration.

You add a chip and exhuast and you kill my current set-up
MK
Old 10-01-2006, 10:31 PM
  #5  
pole position
Burning Brakes
 
pole position's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Official Jack off extinguisher
Posts: 1,173
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

The dynojet reads VERY optimistic. Porsche will not release a regular production car with more than a 3% hp spread up or down on advertised cranknumbers. Fact.

However, there hp can be counted on under the most ardent /harsh conditions...........not like some other manufacturers.

The most accurate chassis dyno is the MAHA but the numbers it spits out are usually low, read real.

The most you will see from a software change without exhaust is about 50 CRANK hp.
Old 10-02-2006, 12:15 AM
  #6  
Woodster
Drifting
 
Woodster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: WEST SIDE OF MPLS, MN
Posts: 2,628
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I agree with POLE,
996TT with little K-16's (like mine):
415 + ECU and exhaust (50+18) == 483 (Hence PSI 480 kit) not 500 not 510 not 520, etc.

480 HP at the crank, period.

everything else is silly conversions, adjustments etc.
I do like the fact he ran a baseline, and ideally he should have done it on the day
he does the ECU uprade with SAME gas, and temperature/weather conditions, dyno operator,
etc. It still may be a useful tool, especially if dyno is independent of who provided mods.
Old 10-02-2006, 03:11 AM
  #7  
Red9
Racer
 
Red9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Oceania
Posts: 477
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Before TB and Jean get here-- those numbers are consistent with an English Dyno that did not stand up to closer examination.
Old 10-02-2006, 12:02 PM
  #8  
LuisGT3
Rennlist Member
 
LuisGT3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 2,464
Received 28 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Woodster
or 415 and 444. Close enough.

Good job on the dyno, you have a fabulous car.

By the way, I am dead even down a mile long straightaway with a stock GT2 (has a fabspeed)
I have little k-16 turbos PSI 480 kit, PSI quiet exhuast, diverter valves, BMC air filter.
they are identical rolling acceleration.

You add a chip and exhuast and you kill my current set-up
MK
Marty,
May father said you were getting some great times up there this weekend.
We need to do a few things to the GT2 to get it back to leaving you behind on the straight.
Old 10-02-2006, 01:01 PM
  #9  
9Eleven
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
9Eleven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Melbourne Beach, Fl
Posts: 1,793
Received 61 Likes on 47 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pole position
The dynojet reads VERY optimistic. Porsche will not release a regular production car with more than a 3% hp spread up or down on advertised cranknumbers. Fact.

However, there hp can be counted on under the most ardent /harsh conditions...........not like some other manufacturers.

The most accurate chassis dyno is the MAHA but the numbers it spits out are usually low, read real.

The most you will see from a software change without exhaust is about 50 CRANK hp.
I would normally agree with you on your optimistic dyno numbers observation, but TPC has run other cars under similar conditions and the dyno did not provide optimistic results. For example, they ran an '06 Viper Coupe, claimed factory crank hp is 510. It dynoed 398 RWHP. An '04 c5 Z06, claimed factory crank hp is 405. It dynoed 335 RWHP. So does the dyno just prefer Porsches or are they slightly underrated?

Last edited by 9Eleven; 10-02-2006 at 01:36 PM.
Old 10-02-2006, 01:09 PM
  #10  
Woodster
Drifting
 
Woodster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: WEST SIDE OF MPLS, MN
Posts: 2,628
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

O.T.

Thanks Luis (Jr.), your father is a good sport and we had alot of fun on the track!
We were both turning some "frighteninly fast times" and yes his car was my reference point
as I followed him down the straight! (for those that don't know, Luis Sr. has a gorgeuos GT2
that is stock (motorwise) other than one of the louder FABSPEED exhausts! He is a great driver
as well!! MK
He is one ECU tune away from walking me on the straights!
Old 10-02-2006, 01:28 PM
  #11  
MarkRobinson
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
MarkRobinson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 2,301
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I agree with 9Eleven: those were probably very accurate numbers (even though nobody expected it).

Maybe you're thinking of the Mustang dynos???? (always optimistic)
Old 10-02-2006, 01:33 PM
  #12  
mitch236
Rennlist Member
 
mitch236's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,819
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I was at the factory last year and this is what I saw and was told. Porsche dyno's every engine. If it puts out less than advertised HP, they either discard it or figure out why it didn't meet specs. If it is over 5% greater than advertised spec, they de-tune it. Only engines that produce at least spec HP or up to 5% greater get released.
Old 10-02-2006, 01:41 PM
  #13  
9Eleven
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
9Eleven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Melbourne Beach, Fl
Posts: 1,793
Received 61 Likes on 47 Posts
Default

How do we explain a Gt3 that traps 117 mph, with 380 hp, having the same trap speed as an '04 c5 Z06 with 405 hp. Both vehicles also weigh about the same. If trap speed is an indicator of hp, then the Gt3 is putting out around 400 to 405 crank horsepower or their drive train loss is substantially lower.
Old 10-02-2006, 02:14 PM
  #14  
pole position
Burning Brakes
 
pole position's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Official Jack off extinguisher
Posts: 1,173
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Again, Porsche hp are the real thing and Chevy , well, maybe you remember the Z01 and it's powerclaims and there exhaust debacle...........
Old 10-02-2006, 02:21 PM
  #15  
9Eleven
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
9Eleven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Melbourne Beach, Fl
Posts: 1,793
Received 61 Likes on 47 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mitch236
I was at the factory last year and this is what I saw and was told. Porsche dyno's every engine. If it puts out less than advertised HP, they either discard it or figure out why it didn't meet specs. If it is over 5% greater than advertised spec, they de-tune it. Only engines that produce at least spec HP or up to 5% greater get released.
456 x 5% = 23 hp, 456 + 23 = 479 - 10% drive train loss = 431. So I think 435 to 444 RWHP is not a number out of the realm of possibility. A 7 percent difference on the plus side would give you 441 RWHP. A slight variation here or there can give you slightly better or worse horsepower.


Quick Reply: Stock 2002 Gt2 Dyno Results



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 09:06 PM.