Notices
996 Turbo Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

2005 Turbo S Performance

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-22-2004, 01:02 PM
  #1  
Philip in AL
Pro
Thread Starter
 
Philip in AL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 677
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 2005 Turbo S Performance

I'm confused, why is a 444Hp TT no faster top end or to 60Mph that the GT3?
Old 05-22-2004, 01:30 PM
  #2  
msindi
Three Wheelin'
 
msindi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Dubai, UAE
Posts: 1,454
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

weight....
Old 05-22-2004, 04:15 PM
  #3  
Dock
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
Dock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Posts: 12,149
Received 776 Likes on 550 Posts
Default

I'm confused, why is a 444Hp TT no faster top end or to 60Mph that the GT3?
Why do you think the 444 hp Turbo isn't faster 0-60?
Old 05-22-2004, 06:59 PM
  #4  
MM951
Race Director
 
MM951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hudson Valley
Posts: 10,607
Received 49 Likes on 39 Posts
Default

Weight wouldnt have much to do with topspeed, just how fast it gets there..
Old 05-22-2004, 07:10 PM
  #5  
1AS
Rennlist Member
 
1AS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: dune acres, Indiana
Posts: 4,085
Received 53 Likes on 28 Posts
Default

It's hard to improve 0-60 in a tt with first gear being so low. A disproportionate amount of time is spent between 0-38 in first gear which is largely dependent on launch conditions (tires and pavement) and the 1-2 shift. It would be much clearer if the cars had a single gear which allowed acceleration to 60 (such as the new Ford GT). Top speed is probably rpm limited, not hp limited. AS
Old 05-23-2004, 01:20 AM
  #6  
Philip in AL
Pro
Thread Starter
 
Philip in AL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 677
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I can't remember where, but I know in the past day I've read about the Turbo S doing 0-60 in 4.2 sec.
Old 05-23-2004, 02:34 AM
  #7  
Dock
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
Dock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Posts: 12,149
Received 776 Likes on 550 Posts
Default

I can't remember where, but I know in the past day I've read about the Turbo S doing 0-60 in 4.2 sec.
If that was a Porsche number, you can consider it conservative. The X50 Turbo has been tested 0-60 in 3.7 sec. The best time I've seen for the non-X50 Turbo is 3.9 sec.
Old 05-27-2004, 03:19 PM
  #8  
DonneyJ
Instructor
 
DonneyJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Autocar in the UK tested the TTX50 last month ..0 - 60 in 3.8 secs, they said it's ride, handling,steering,brakes and performance(not to mention fuel consumption) was better than the Aston Martin DB9, but the DB9 was the better car as it was so stylish with a neat interior.....what a load of crap

DonnyJ
Old 05-27-2004, 04:37 PM
  #9  
Bob Rouleau

Still plays with cars.
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Bob Rouleau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Montreal
Posts: 15,078
Received 256 Likes on 119 Posts
Default

Donny - The British magazines are a great source of impartial information about cars ... unless the car in question is British. If they compare a Jag, Mercedes and BMW, you can bet the Jag will win. Nothing is perfect
Old 05-27-2004, 04:50 PM
  #10  
Sloth
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Sloth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Naples, Florida
Posts: 2,593
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 1 Post
Default

I ran with a bunch of modified TT's one weekend. I had no problem keeping up with any of them on short bursts up to 60-70mph. However, keep the pedal down much past 70-80mph and the TT will eventualy walk away from the GT3. Amazing what all that torque can do...
Old 05-31-2004, 07:40 PM
  #11  
NJ-GT
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
NJ-GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Los Everglades
Posts: 6,583
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

I ran a X50 Tiptronic from 80mph to 150mph on my car about 2 weeks ago. Both cars were dead even.

The fastest Porsche I have seen running the 1/4 mile did a 12.27 on a cold November day in 2002 at Englishtown, NJ. It was Porsche day at that place. Car was a black TT X50 Tiptronic, and he got 1st place after all the bracket drag racing was over.

I ran a 12.261 at the same place on May 22nd, 2004. It was a hot and humid day (79 degrees and 82% Humidity). First time in the drag strip with the new car. It was before the exhaust, air filter mods and when the car was 100 lbs heavier.

Weight is the enemy.
Old 05-31-2004, 08:08 PM
  #12  
Dock
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
Dock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Posts: 12,149
Received 776 Likes on 550 Posts
Default

Weight is the enemy.
The launch is the enemy. Most Turbo owners aren't willing to do the 3000-5000 rpm drop clutch launches.

In the quarter mile, a 200 lb savings is worth (only) about a tenth of a second.
Old 06-02-2004, 01:58 PM
  #13  
996racer
Advanced
 
996racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by NJ-GT
I
The fastest Porsche I have seen running the 1/4 mile did a 12.27 on a cold November day in 2002 at Englishtown, NJ. It was Porsche day at that place. Car was a black TT X50 Tiptronic, and he got 1st place after all the bracket drag racing was over.

I ran a 12.261 at the same place on May 22nd, 2004. It was a hot and humid day (79 degrees and 82% Humidity). First time in the drag strip with the new car. It was before the exhaust, air filter mods and when the car was 100 lbs heavier.

Weight is the enemy.



Braket racing a Porsche? Dont you think that is a bit of a waste of all the suspension and brake technology you purchased with that car?
Old 06-04-2004, 11:30 PM
  #14  
NJ-GT
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
NJ-GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Los Everglades
Posts: 6,583
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

996Racer:

That was an event organized by NNJ-PCA. Believe me, they do more track events and auto-x than any other PCA chapter. A lot of work on suspension and brakes.

Visit: http://www.nnjr-pca.com

BTW, I haven't seen your car at the track or auto-x.
Old 06-05-2004, 02:34 PM
  #15  
sjsharks
Racer
 
sjsharks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The 0 to 60 has to do with weight, and the top end has to do with the narrower GT3.


Quick Reply: 2005 Turbo S Performance



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:26 PM.