Notices
996 Turbo Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Lightweight Flywheel

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-04-2019 | 11:15 AM
  #16  
Carlo_Carrera's Avatar
Carlo_Carrera
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 11,599
Likes: 2,700
From: Nearby
Default

Originally Posted by powdrhound
The GT3 crank has twice the oiling capacity of the TT crank. That is why I say the TT crank is inferior.
Why do think that is? Strength issue? The Turbo mechanicals produce too much torque for a GT3 crank to handle?

Last edited by Carlo_Carrera; 10-04-2019 at 12:08 PM.
Old 10-04-2019 | 11:25 AM
  #17  
powdrhound's Avatar
powdrhound
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 7,229
Likes: 2,022
Default

Originally Posted by Carlo_Carrera
Why do think that is? Strength issue? The Turbo mechanicals product too much torque for a GT3 crank to handle?
It’s not a strength issue in my opinion. I’ve been using a GT3 crank for 5 years . Most likely it was cheaper at the time to manufacture the TT crank in the larger numbers required for the TT production market. Porsche probably figured the TT crank was sufficient for the lower rpms seen by the turbo engine and they were not designing a crank for racing conditions which necessitated some design changes to the crank to improve oiling capacity. For vast majority of users and applications, the TT crank is more than sufficient.

Last edited by powdrhound; 10-04-2019 at 12:05 PM.
Old 10-04-2019 | 02:27 PM
  #18  
Carlo_Carrera's Avatar
Carlo_Carrera
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 11,599
Likes: 2,700
From: Nearby
Default

Originally Posted by powdrhound
It’s not a strength issue in my opinion. I’ve been using a GT3 crank for 5 years . Most likely it was cheaper at the time to manufacture the TT crank in the larger numbers required for the TT production market. Porsche probably figured the TT crank was sufficient for the lower rpms seen by the turbo engine and they were not designing a crank for racing conditions which necessitated some design changes to the crank to improve oiling capacity. For vast majority of users and applications, the TT crank is more than sufficient.
Are the Turbo crank and the GT3 crank the exact same spec except for the oil ports?
Old 10-04-2019 | 02:53 PM
  #19  
powdrhound's Avatar
powdrhound
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 7,229
Likes: 2,022
Default

Originally Posted by Carlo_Carrera
Are the Turbo crank and the GT3 crank the exact same spec except for the oil ports?
Both 76.4mm. The GT3 crank is a pound or two lighter if I recall. Can’t remember the exact number. I can weigh them when I get a chance as I have a TT, 7GT3, and the latest gen 991Cup crank at home.
Old 10-10-2019 | 10:19 AM
  #20  
etchhead's Avatar
etchhead
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 856
Likes: 12
From: Bay Area, CA and Portland
Default

I went with Sambo (ByDesign) suggestion: Clutch/LWFW GT3RS 4.0 and am a fan. As other say only get a bit of noise with AC in neutral. Push in clutch and goes away. It the rev is instantaneous- feels much quicker darting around.
Old 10-10-2019 | 03:31 PM
  #21  
2fcknfst's Avatar
2fcknfst
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 18,970
Likes: 4,262
From: Vancouver
Default

I have Kevins GT3RS 4.0 version, a little chatter but I barely notice it.

In all my manual cars, and two diesel trucks, I have them.

Kevin's assessment with the 996tt is going with a lwfw would be akin to adding 30hp.
The following users liked this post:
etchhead (10-11-2019)



Quick Reply: Lightweight Flywheel



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 01:26 AM.