Notices
996 GT2/GT3 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Dyno Results

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-15-2016, 10:54 AM
  #31  
Charles@dundonmotorsports
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
Charles@dundonmotorsports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by AudiOn19s
The old thread about John's car (911SLOW) seems to have disappeared which stinks because it had alot of great info in it.

He did back to back testing of the IPD unit on a dyno. The graph showed torque gains through about 5500 rpm but otherwise power and torque were lower than the OEM setup at the top of the curve.

I'd love to see another independent test. A fried of mine installed one of these a year or so ago and swears the mid range pull is much improved on his car. He never dyno tested thought.

Numerous times I looked at machining the OEM plenum and adding an 82mm throttle body to see if it'd add any power on my car but I haven't found enough compelling evidence that it's worth it to go down that road.
I have a pile of parts to test on 996 GT3's (or one single one just for testing) I just have to have the time to do so. I have been working backwords with all of the packages for these cars, and I have stuff to do on the 6-3 and a lot of parts to test, just have to get to it. CUrrently on the 6-3 other than my exhaust setups (dual and single exit, and 2 different header lengths) I have 2 different other intake manifold/plenum options, I want to test the IPD, and I also want to try my 2 other setups to compare, as well as my other air box, and then I have 2 sets of cams (one is just intake cams, other is intake and exhaust) to test. on the 997 3.6 gt3 I just have to head back to the dyno to test the current setup, but expect a full 40whp gain over stock after a quick tune, (359whp---> 400whp?) so I am hoping for similar gains on the 6-3, should be able to go from 355whp --> 390whp. I'm up over 40 on the 3.8 now, then once done with the 3.8RS, i'm going to finish the 3.6rs, then the 6-3
Old 03-15-2016, 11:09 AM
  #32  
Cheyne
Instructor
 
Cheyne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: W. Vancouver BC Canada
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I have no horse in the race on this but if anyone wants an IPD plenum and throttle body for their 996 GT3, i have one that is just about brand new which I will let go for half of cost. I do not frequent this forum but I can be reached at 604 253 6586. Ian has seen it so it's not a phantom part
Cheyne

Last edited by Cheyne; 03-15-2016 at 11:28 AM.
Old 03-15-2016, 11:45 AM
  #33  
Charles@dundonmotorsports
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
Charles@dundonmotorsports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Cheyne
I have no horse in the race on this but if anyone wants an IPD plenum and throttle body for their 996 GT3, i have one that is just about brand new which I will let go for half of cost. I do not frequent this forum but I can be reached at 604 253 6586. Ian has seen it so it's not a phantom part
Cheyne
I can vouch for Cheyne. He is legit and has the only good shop in BC that I know of. Someone should buy it out and try it out. Can never have too much data.
Old 03-15-2016, 05:26 PM
  #34  
fbirch
Burning Brakes
 
fbirch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Metairie, LA
Posts: 792
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Charles@dundonmotorsports
I have a pile of parts to test on 996 GT3's (or one single one just for testing) I just have to have the time to do so. I have been working backwords with all of the packages for these cars, and I have stuff to do on the 6-3 and a lot of parts to test, just have to get to it. CUrrently on the 6-3 other than my exhaust setups (dual and single exit, and 2 different header lengths) I have 2 different other intake manifold/plenum options, I want to test the IPD, and I also want to try my 2 other setups to compare, as well as my other air box, and then I have 2 sets of cams (one is just intake cams, other is intake and exhaust) to test. on the 997 3.6 gt3 I just have to head back to the dyno to test the current setup, but expect a full 40whp gain over stock after a quick tune, (359whp---> 400whp?) so I am hoping for similar gains on the 6-3, should be able to go from 355whp --> 390whp. I'm up over 40 on the 3.8 now, then once done with the 3.8RS, i'm going to finish the 3.6rs, then the 6-3
It would be great to see you develop a complete upgrade kit for the 996 GT3. At some point all of us will need to refresh our engines, and a well developed upgrade kit - backed by quantified dyno testing - would be a great option to have.
Old 03-15-2016, 05:31 PM
  #35  
Charles@dundonmotorsports
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
Charles@dundonmotorsports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by fbirch
It would be great to see you develop a complete upgrade kit for the 996 GT3. At some point all of us will need to refresh our engines, and a well developed upgrade kit - backed by quantified dyno testing - would be a great option to have.
I am doing a budget oriented 996 GT3 4.0 build right now, but this will be basically how low cost can we get to 500hp and keep 100% reliability and such and not have to rev the **** out of the engine.

I also have a bolt on setup for engines that are solid that guys dont want to tear apart, thats the one i'm hoping to get close to 390whp from 355whp stock long block.

The 996-3 4.0 simple build should be done end of april
Old 03-15-2016, 05:46 PM
  #36  
996FLT6
Rennlist Member
 
996FLT6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: san francisco
Posts: 13,988
Received 235 Likes on 191 Posts
Default

Wow^- keep us updated : ). Mike
Old 03-15-2016, 05:49 PM
  #37  
fbirch
Burning Brakes
 
fbirch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Metairie, LA
Posts: 792
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Charles@dundonmotorsports
I am doing a budget oriented 996 GT3 4.0 build right now, but this will be basically how low cost can we get to 500hp and keep 100% reliability and such and not have to rev the **** out of the engine.

I also have a bolt on setup for engines that are solid that guys dont want to tear apart, thats the one i'm hoping to get close to 390whp from 355whp stock long block.

The 996-3 4.0 simple build should be done end of april
Sounds very interesting!
Old 03-15-2016, 11:13 PM
  #38  
Steve W
Racer
 
Steve W's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: PV Estates, CA
Posts: 379
Received 99 Likes on 39 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Charles@dundonmotorsports
actually i did not see that, i only saw on the comparison sheet that the one ratio was listed, thanks for pointing that out.

I m still curious about the difference in the resonance peaks being so far off. I have seen them off before by intake air temp because the SOS changes as air temp does. as it gets hotter the sound waves move faster, but i've only seen it move 100rpms or so tops.

I am no in any way disagreeing with your dyno or data, just curious as to those peaks being so far off.... Maing me want to give one of those a try again
The error on a Dynapack comes from and depends upon the accuracy of the operator calibrating the engine rpm to the hub speed. Typically on setup, the operator puts the car in the test gear (3rd or 4th) and revs the engine to what he eyeballs as approximately 3000 rpm on the dash tach, and enters that as the hub speed to rpm ratio. Obviously the accuracy or lack of is dependent upon how accurate the dash tach is and how accurate the operator eyeballs where he thinks 3000 rpm is. Typically I see errors by this method being 2-300 rpm off of the actual value. If you were 200 rpm low the first time the car was dyno'd, and 200 rpm high the second time, you'd have a 400 rpm delta, shifting the hp and torque curves off of each other noticeably. The most accurate way is an inductive clamp such as a Dynojet uses that reads the spark pulse off one of the plug leads, but a Dynapack doesn't have this option as far as I know. So to get the most accurate calibration for such a situation, we connect a PIWIS to the OBD port and read the actual RPM values off the screen which is used to calibrate the to the dyno.
Old 03-15-2016, 11:41 PM
  #39  
Cheyne
Instructor
 
Cheyne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: W. Vancouver BC Canada
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Charles@dundonmotorsports
I can vouch for Cheyne. He is legit and has the only good shop in BC that I know of. Someone should buy it out and try it out. Can never have too much data.
Thanks for the kind words Charles, there are a couple guys around here that know a thing or 2 though.
Old 03-15-2016, 11:45 PM
  #40  
Cheyne
Instructor
 
Cheyne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: W. Vancouver BC Canada
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Steve W
The error on a Dynapack comes from and depends upon the accuracy of the operator calibrating the engine rpm to the hub speed. Typically on setup, the operator puts the car in the test gear (3rd or 4th) and revs the engine to what he eyeballs as approximately 3000 rpm on the dash tach, and enters that as the hub speed to rpm ratio. Obviously the accuracy or lack of is dependent upon how accurate the dash tach is and how accurate the operator eyeballs where he thinks 3000 rpm is. Typically I see errors by this method being 2-300 rpm off of the actual value. If you were 200 rpm low the first time the car was dyno'd, and 200 rpm high the second time, you'd have a 400 rpm delta, shifting the hp and torque curves off of each other noticeably. The most accurate way is an inductive clamp such as a Dynojet uses that reads the spark pulse off one of the plug leads, but a Dynapack doesn't have this option as far as I know. So to get the most accurate calibration for such a situation, we connect a PIWIS to the OBD port and read the actual RPM values off the screen which is used to calibrate the to the dyno.
Actually, If you know your gear ratios Dynapacks are dead accurate on rpm, in fact 100% which cannot be said about an inductive clamp.

Ian, the car did better because the tune was marginal to begin with. The modifications you have done took advantage of the previous map issues, you made a video of the piwis 2 which showed the timing retard of which was fairly steady at zero, there was a little retard occurring when it went on cam. We hadn't spent anytime anylizing what was happening due to the fact that there was not any point In doing such we had no way to fine tune the car. POINTLESS!! Much like the banter In this thread . What I will tell you is the minute you dump those heat soaking cats I will bet you a steak dinner that the ignition retard that we did have will almost disappear. Then fine tuning from that point will be the way to go if you want to afford to do it. Once the basic modifications are done , the $-hp cost start rising exponentially.

Last edited by Cheyne; 03-16-2016 at 12:06 AM.
Old 03-16-2016, 05:34 AM
  #41  
Steve W
Racer
 
Steve W's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: PV Estates, CA
Posts: 379
Received 99 Likes on 39 Posts
Default

Perhaps, but in 15 years of dyno tuning hundreds of 911s, and thousands upon thousands of dyno runs done on virtually every dyno that exists out there, I've never seen anyone calibrate a Dynapack by gear ratios, and my bet is it wasn't done in the way in this thread either as that's what's really being discussed here. It is frustrating when the calibration is 200 rpm off, and you are fine tuning map points in software that are in 100-200 point increments as you don't know if you're actually nailing the correct points until you do repeated tests and figure out you're not.

Not sure how you conclude an inductive clamp to be inaccurate. It's a digital count, with pulses per second being counted by a computer, so no eyeballing there. Inductive clamp readings I've found are accurate on a Dynojet, unless the wires of the car have so much RFI leakage, then the clamp and computer can't even get a reading, which doesn't count. It is binary - it either reads or it doesn't and in the thousands of runs I've performed on them, it has been dead accurate.
Old 03-16-2016, 11:26 AM
  #42  
Rhonda@FVD
Addict
Rennlist Member


Rennlist
Site Sponsor
 
Rhonda@FVD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 776
Received 50 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by IanM
After reading all the scepticism regarding the IPD intake plenum and 82mm 997 GT3 throttle body mod, I decided to buy it anyways. I recently took the car back to the same Dynapack dyno and same dyno operator who tested the car almost exactly four years ago. No other mods have been made since 2012 (still have the FVD headers/tune and Europipe exhaust).
Ian,

Nice results with the addition of the IPD and throttle body. Not bad for an OTS tune from many years ago adjusting to your new mod. Did the previous owner deliver the car with the FVD tuning cable or hand held FVD Software Delivery tool by chance?

By the way you are in excellent hands with Cheyne.

Also, a quick hello to Charles.

Rhonda
__________________
__________________
FVD Brombacher - USA

Contact me directly to get the latest FVD forum member discount!

Rhonda Roxburgh
+1-954-571-2050 x 1
rhonda.roxburgh@fvd.net

Want to learn more about us? Click here...



Old 03-16-2016, 02:37 PM
  #43  
Rovman
Rennlist Member
 
Rovman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Lafayette, La.
Posts: 847
Received 6 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by fbirch
Sounds very interesting!
Agreed!!!
Old 03-16-2016, 02:52 PM
  #44  
christallon
Rennlist Member
 
christallon's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,944
Likes: 0
Received 204 Likes on 136 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Cheyne
I have no horse in the race on this but if anyone wants an IPD plenum and throttle body for their 996 GT3, i have one that is just about brand new which I will let go for half of cost. I do not frequent this forum but I can be reached at 604 253 6586. Ian has seen it so it's not a phantom part
Cheyne
Hi Cheyne. I'll take the plenum and throttle body. Cheers
Old 03-16-2016, 05:30 PM
  #45  
swbatte
Pro
 
swbatte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 605
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Joining this thread late, but here's my dyno run for comparison.
4 wheel dyno in a controlled room where fans blow air over the car at the speed at which it's travelling, and exhaust fans venting it to avoid supercharging the room.



Quick Reply: Dyno Results



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 09:29 PM.