Notices
996 GT2/GT3 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

revalving shocks

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-17-2011, 10:24 AM
  #16  
himself
Rennlist Member
 
himself's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,735
Received 36 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

FWIW, I went for 700#/900#. First event is this weekend. Will post thoughts when I get back.
Old 02-17-2011, 11:32 AM
  #17  
KOAN
Rennlist Member
 
KOAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 2,794
Received 159 Likes on 110 Posts
Default

Another thing to consider is whether or not to make the springs progressive, that is, using a "tender" spring, or to make them single rate, or using a "helper" spring. A progressive rate will make street driving much more civil, but will require a little more time for the car to take a "set" in a turn on the track. I switched from tender springs with rates of around #250 to helpers, with essentially #0. My car is mostly a track car, and I noticed the difference immediately, and greatly prefer it. I have 800/1000 mains. Their are posts in the archives in the Racing Forum for anyone who is interested in this, and possibly here as well.
Old 03-02-2011, 08:51 PM
  #18  
atr911
Burning Brakes
 
atr911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Stoney Creek
Posts: 1,130
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

This is wild... I can't imagine why anyone would spend the money on Motons or JRZ if the revalve is so cheap. $400 vs $5000 and all you get are some adjustment ***** that all but the racing engineers will know how to adjust....
Old 03-02-2011, 10:25 PM
  #19  
va122
Drifting
 
va122's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: On Rennlist avoiding work
Posts: 3,065
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

The adjustment is key. You have understeer, one click and it's gone for example
Old 03-02-2011, 10:35 PM
  #20  
KOAN
Rennlist Member
 
KOAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 2,794
Received 159 Likes on 110 Posts
Default

It would be best to drive both before you decide which is for you. I've had Motons on my last 2 cars, and love them. For me, the adjustments made a huge difference. No doubt, there is also a huge difference in cost as well. As I said above, tenders vs. helpers also make a huge difference. Nittos vs. slicks (or even R6s)...the list goes on.
Old 03-02-2011, 11:04 PM
  #21  
himself
Rennlist Member
 
himself's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,735
Received 36 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

After driving the last event I can say that the car is much faster with the revalved shocks, but would be even faster with multi-way adjustables. There are some spots on the track that having fast bump/rebound would be VERY helpful (i.e., curbing and rumble strips). But for the most part, car balance is much improved all the way around, which is a big plus.

-td
Old 03-02-2011, 11:20 PM
  #22  
Mike K.
Rennlist Member
 
Mike K.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Provo, TCI
Posts: 1,097
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by atr911
This is wild... I can't imagine why anyone would spend the money on Motons or JRZ if the revalve is so cheap. $400 vs $5000 and all you get are some adjustment ***** that all but the racing engineers will know how to adjust....
It's like the power seat option. Set it once and you're done.
Old 03-03-2011, 05:15 PM
  #23  
Q&A
Rennlist Member
 
Q&A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 1,319
Likes: 0
Received 65 Likes on 42 Posts
Default

Has anybody revalved at Bilstein in Europe (which country) and what were the cost then approximately ?
Does a car need to be re-aligned after the shocks are revalved or replaced ?
What type of Bilsteins were originally installed on a 2004 GT3 ? PSS9 ?
Old 03-04-2011, 04:17 AM
  #24  
dan212
Rennlist Member
 
dan212's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,605
Received 103 Likes on 73 Posts
Default

I can't see how you can pull the suspension apart, change the springs and shocks and NOT align.. Not the place to cut corners anyway. last summer I had to replace a worn rear link and had the car aligned without giving it a second thought.

Odds are, your alignment is knocked off before anyway.. Its easier than most realize (the degree maybe doesn't matter quite as much on the street, but absolutely does on the track). I align a couple of times a track season - especially because I do drive on the street.
Old 03-04-2011, 01:52 PM
  #25  
Roland 93
Rennlist Member
 
Roland 93's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 127
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by himself
After driving the last event I can say that the car is much faster with the revalved shocks, but would be even faster with multi-way adjustables. There are some spots on the track that having fast bump/rebound would be VERY helpful (i.e., curbing and rumble strips). But for the most part, car balance is much improved all the way around, which is a big plus.

-td
What are your impressions of 700/900 on the street compared to stock?

Cheers
Roland
Old 03-06-2011, 12:18 PM
  #26  
rodneyr
Three Wheelin'
 
rodneyr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Darien, CT
Posts: 1,256
Received 155 Likes on 106 Posts
Default

Yes, much less expensive to revalve vs. Motons. However, you need to consider alignment, removing/installation, possibly new springs so the real price is $2,000- $3,000 and the results are very good.
Old 03-06-2011, 07:30 PM
  #27  
himself
Rennlist Member
 
himself's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,735
Received 36 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Roland 93
What are your impressions of 700/900 on the street compared to stock?
Almost no difference on the street. Some rapid changes in pavement have a little more umph, but I drove it 5 hours to the track and 5 back and didn't even notice the change.

Originally Posted by rodneyr
Yes, much less expensive to revalve vs. Motons. However, you need to consider alignment, removing/installation, possibly new springs so the real price is $2,000- $3,000 and the results are very good.
I just did the whole thing. Final cost for springs, shocks revalved, rear monoball mounts, rear toe arms with locking plate was right at $2000. Install, alignment and corner balance was $1350. Total was $3350 installed and out the door.

However, when comparing to other upgrades, I only consider the first $2000 as any suspension change would incur the same (or a bit more) cost for install, alignment and corner balance. So around $2000 [all in] vs $5000 [just shocks!] for motons.

-td

-td
Old 04-08-2011, 04:58 PM
  #28  
BealeAss
Rennlist Member
 
BealeAss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: 4.5Live Free Or Die
Posts: 621
Received 342 Likes on 96 Posts
Default

For OEM springs what's the general re-valving specs? Apparently my fronts are blown so I"m just going to send all 4 in this week. Do I need to get new springs? Even worth it?
Old 04-08-2011, 06:36 PM
  #29  
Horizontally Opposed Man
Rennlist Member
 
Horizontally Opposed Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Southern Pines NC
Posts: 431
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default OEM Rates

You need to check with a well informed tech to be sure but I "think"stock is 250/450.If you track the car suggest you look thru this thread and see what folks have done I am at 800/1000 right now and I like a firm ride on the street and use the car mostly on the track but those rates aren't troublesome to me on the street.
Old 04-08-2011, 10:56 PM
  #30  
BealeAss
Rennlist Member
 
BealeAss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: 4.5Live Free Or Die
Posts: 621
Received 342 Likes on 96 Posts
Default

What kind of springs do you guys suggest f I do the revalve and add some fun?


Quick Reply: revalving shocks



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 07:12 PM.