Notices
996 GT2/GT3 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

'04 GT3 For Sale

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-07-2010, 08:54 PM
  #16  
roberga
Nordschleife Master
 
roberga's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: SEATTLE
Posts: 5,165
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 996FLT6
^roberga- had no clue. U sold your 7? Mike
Life changes: small pre IPO with no time to play until we sell. I got an ugly Panamera 4S sorry guys but it is a great car. I will be putting together a car for tracking only. Spec cayman or 996GT3 for next year.
Old 06-07-2010, 09:49 PM
  #17  
mooty
GT3 player par excellence
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
mooty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: san francisco
Posts: 43,395
Received 5,630 Likes on 2,314 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by roberga
Life changes: small pre IPO with no time to play until we sell. I got an ugly Panamera 4S sorry guys but it is a great car. I will be putting together a car for tracking only. Spec cayman or 996GT3 for next year.
cool give me until mid 2011, just in time to buy my track modded 996gt3.
Old 06-08-2010, 01:17 AM
  #18  
Carefree
Pro
 
Carefree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hmmm, I believe Gordon will be putting together "whatever car he chooses" at the time and it will most likely be a GT3?
That is just my guess.

Gorden, quite working, traveling and staying too darn busy too be a track junky!
Hope all is well, the sun is shining in Portland, so swing on by.
Old 06-24-2010, 02:45 AM
  #19  
jberkes
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
jberkes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

So guys, what do you think? Got an offer for my GT3 of $51k. Am I getting low-balled? I'm inclined to keep it at that price & put a lift in the garage (can do w/12' ceiling height).
Old 06-24-2010, 03:40 AM
  #20  
AllanJ
Rennlist Member
 
AllanJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 1,968
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Sounds low to me.
Old 06-24-2010, 07:43 AM
  #21  
LVDell
Nordschleife Master
 
LVDell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Tobacco Road, NC
Posts: 5,225
Likes: 0
Received 28 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

I would think if he is offering 51 and you asked 59 then he thinks the "magic number" is in the mid 50s (i.e., 55K). I'd go back with 55K and that's it. 51K isn't an insult but it is sure less than what the car is worth.
Old 06-24-2010, 10:59 AM
  #22  
Camber
Rennlist Member
 
Camber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Just for comparison, I just bought a 2004 GT3, Basalt Black, Xenon, 16k miles, iron brakes, 0 overrevs, with new tires, new front rotors/pads, and new CPO warranty (started with my purchase so two years beginning this month) for $57k. Purchased from a Porsche dealer. So, honestly, 51k may be a little low, but not by much. PCCB is either a positive or a negative depending on the buyer - for me it's a negative.
Old 06-24-2010, 11:04 AM
  #23  
cfjan
Rennlist Member
 
cfjan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 2,808
Likes: 0
Received 33 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

PCCB should not be a negative.. at most, it is even. Why would it be a negative when it can be replaced w/ iron once they are done? I understand that one does not want to pay UP for it.. but it shouldn't be a negative even if you track it..
Old 06-24-2010, 12:46 PM
  #24  
KOAN
Rennlist Member
 
KOAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 2,797
Received 162 Likes on 111 Posts
Default

How should it be even when, as soon as you buy the car, you will have to spend another $1k+ to make that car track ready?
Old 06-24-2010, 12:50 PM
  #25  
cfjan
Rennlist Member
 
cfjan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 2,808
Likes: 0
Received 33 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

It is at least even because you can track the PCCB also..

PCCB is no less durable than iron, I think they are more durable, but just not proportional to their cost...

So you run the PCCB as is.. and they last longer than the iron rotors.. (so you are up already)

And when PCCB is worn, you change to iron, for the same price as if you are changing a iron equipped car..

That's how I see it..

I would consider PCCB a negative, only if you are obligated to replace them w/ PCCB. So you are hooked for the high price rotors. But it is not the case here.
Old 06-24-2010, 01:16 PM
  #26  
DRG13
Pro
 
DRG13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: SLC, UT
Posts: 627
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Pull off PCCB's, sell them and you've got cash for a new set of steel and tires...and gas for a day..
Old 06-24-2010, 01:34 PM
  #27  
KOAN
Rennlist Member
 
KOAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 2,797
Received 162 Likes on 111 Posts
Default

I heard that tracked Gen I PCCBs didn't last long, especially on the front. Then, when you go to Steel, you need different pads as well.
Old 06-24-2010, 01:42 PM
  #28  
cfjan
Rennlist Member
 
cfjan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 2,808
Likes: 0
Received 33 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

I think they last longer but just not proportional to their cost... so they are not cost effective..

One of the members here (roberga) has done a lot of track days on his '04 GT3 (1st gen).. and I believe his rear rotors were still original when he sold the car w/ 60k miles? While the front were replaced to 2nd gen after something like 20k miles+? (forgot)

Of course, we can always do what DRG suggested.. take them out, sell the rotors (assuming in good condition, and in this case, they should be, as they have only seen street miles), and you would still be up after buying a set of irons.. !!
Old 06-24-2010, 01:58 PM
  #29  
AllanJ
Rennlist Member
 
AllanJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 1,968
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chuck Price
I heard that tracked Gen I PCCBs didn't last long, especially on the front. Then, when you go to Steel, you need different pads as well.
You don't need different pads. The P90 compound is roughly equivalent to RS19 with some magic fairy dust in them to make them play nice with PCCB (info from an old Q&A with Joel from PCA). I've used P90 on my iron rotors and they work fine. Also, it's real easy to use partially worn PCCB pads with iron rotors because PCCB rotors don't really wear. Never get grooves (aside from failure) so the pads stay dead flat, just thinner over time. When you install new iron rotors, you won't be matching those up with old grooved pads.

Cheers,
Old 06-24-2010, 06:27 PM
  #30  
Mr Michael B

Lifetime Rennlist
Member

 
Mr Michael B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Central US of A
Posts: 2,327
Received 66 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

PCCB is fine on the track... With one caveat (that has been discussed here before) = Stay out of the ABS. The hammering of the ABS is what deteriorates the rotors.

For me that has not been an issue as I took the brake pedal out and tossed it away (its just weight and all it seems to do is slow you down anyhow).


Quick Reply: '04 GT3 For Sale



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 02:48 AM.