Should I buy Ceramic Brakes ?
#17
Three Wheelin'
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by viperbob
It is not just the rotors that are different, it is the ABS unit that has been modified. Apparently part of the issue with the PCCBs was not only the heat issue, but on track it was the ABS pounding the rotors during lockup situations. The new unit is not supposed to not be as brutal to the rotors under ABS lock.
This is all a bit irrelevent anyway, even if the news ones last 50% longer they aren't even close to being cost effective if you track the car.
#20
Nordschleife Master
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
good choice..... PCCB are not worth the extra dollors if you are tracking. Are they better? .... yes. Do they wieght less?..... will it be worth a $10,500 bill just for front rotors?......not for me.
How many race worthy steel rotors can you get for $10K? Will PCCB last 10 times longer? NO.
If the replacement cost was reduced to something reasonable as $2500 each it would be a closer call.
How many race worthy steel rotors can you get for $10K? Will PCCB last 10 times longer? NO.
If the replacement cost was reduced to something reasonable as $2500 each it would be a closer call.
#21
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Ditto, the drill hole pattern is different on the Gen II's. The Gen I's go in an even circular pattern, the Gen II's do not. I saw the actual difference in Excellence magazine. No problems with mine, only 3700 miles though. I also don't track her, just drive her real fast on back country southern Maryland roads.
![Wink](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
#22
#23
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by nielsll
Has anyone tried the ceramic coated titanium rotors? www.reddevilbrakes.com/
R+C
#24
Still plays with cars.
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
www.stoptech.com has a good article about why cast iron is the best rotor material. After my PCCB "adventure" I agree with them!
![Big Grin](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
#25
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Bob Rouleau
www.stoptech.com has a good article about why cast iron is the best rotor material. After my PCCB "adventure" I agree with them!![Big Grin](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
![Big Grin](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
#26
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Ray G
I think PCCB has superior performance compared to iron rotors - but they cost a hell of a lot more. So from a value point of view, iron is better. If money was no object, then I would want PCCBs.
The value in the PCCBs lies not in their retardation capability, which can be matched with iron rotors, but in their contribution to the reduction in unspruing, and overall weight.
As somebody who tests brakes, from time to time, I can explain that the best retardation figures are recorded when one gets on the brakes as hard as possible as soon as possible (that is once the decision to brake has been made). At first it is slightly puckering to brake with maximum effort at 300kph, but the effect is gratifying.
For those who are interested, the rotors used are cast at the same foundry that supplies Porsche, but their interior design is more sophisticated. The callipers are manufactured in house from single aero grade aluminium billets. Their design is optimised to reduce flex, cool brake fluid and apply high clamping force, their pads have a high surface area, greater than other callipers with more pistons.
R+C
#27
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Ray G
I think PCCB has superior performance compared to iron rotors - but they cost a hell of a lot more. So from a value point of view, iron is better. If money was no object, then I would want PCCBs.
#28
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by bora
I had both on my car, I don't think you can tell the difference in terms of braking.
#29
Nordschleife Master
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
here is the deal from my view: You can now make an informed decision. For me the biggest issue is and was the missinformation from Porsche regarding the wear issues on PCCB. I own part of it in that I did not research enough prior to my purchase. If I knew the real information on replacement it would have impacted what I paid for the car.
#30
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Ray G
PCCBs have a much more linear friction response than iron. If you drive them back to back you will feel the difference. As I posted elsewhere, there are many advantages to ceramic rotors. I'm not saying they are appropriate for a passenger car.