Notices
996 GT2/GT3 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Should I buy Ceramic Brakes ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-20-2006, 08:40 PM
  #16  
bora
Racer
 
bora's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 489
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Bob

Can you check in PET to see if the ABS unit between 04 and 05 GT3s has a different part #?

Thanks
Old 03-20-2006, 09:24 PM
  #17  
DanH
Three Wheelin'
 
DanH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,450
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by viperbob
It is not just the rotors that are different, it is the ABS unit that has been modified. Apparently part of the issue with the PCCBs was not only the heat issue, but on track it was the ABS pounding the rotors during lockup situations. The new unit is not supposed to not be as brutal to the rotors under ABS lock.
Where is this info from? I've only ever seen it 2nd hand on forums. Does this mean the turbo S has a different ABS unit assuming it did ship with Gen2?

This is all a bit irrelevent anyway, even if the news ones last 50% longer they aren't even close to being cost effective if you track the car.
Old 03-21-2006, 12:55 AM
  #18  
healeyg
Instructor
 
healeyg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Wilton, CT USA
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

turbo s has different abs programming as it is a different car (4WD requires a different abs program) and weighs more
Old 03-21-2006, 03:05 PM
  #19  
boqueron
Pro
Thread Starter
 
boqueron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Madrid, Spain
Posts: 747
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Once again thanks to everybody. My conclusion: I will not pay any overprice for Ceramic brakes... if I find one for less money with "regular" brakes...
Old 03-21-2006, 06:45 PM
  #20  
roberga
Nordschleife Master
 
roberga's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: SEATTLE
Posts: 5,165
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

good choice..... PCCB are not worth the extra dollors if you are tracking. Are they better? .... yes. Do they wieght less?..... will it be worth a $10,500 bill just for front rotors?......not for me.
How many race worthy steel rotors can you get for $10K? Will PCCB last 10 times longer? NO.

If the replacement cost was reduced to something reasonable as $2500 each it would be a closer call.
Old 03-23-2006, 12:53 PM
  #21  
Janina993
Advanced
 
Janina993's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Finland
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ditto, the drill hole pattern is different on the Gen II's. The Gen I's go in an even circular pattern, the Gen II's do not. I saw the actual difference in Excellence magazine. No problems with mine, only 3700 miles though. I also don't track her, just drive her real fast on back country southern Maryland roads.
Correct! Here is quote from the new GT3 brochure "To maximise cooling during extreme brake usage, the internal vents within each disc are subject to continuous development. The number of cooling channels has recently been doubled, while a new vent geometry offers a better flow of air through the disc. With moore cooling channels, there are more internal walls creating greater structural stability. Externally, these modifications are clearly visible in the form of a modified drill-hole pattern"
Old 03-24-2006, 02:44 PM
  #22  
nielsll
3rd Gear
 
nielsll's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Has anyone tried the ceramic coated titanium rotors? www.reddevilbrakes.com/
Old 03-24-2006, 02:50 PM
  #23  
Nordschleife
Drifting
 
Nordschleife's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Munich
Posts: 2,722
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by nielsll
Has anyone tried the ceramic coated titanium rotors? www.reddevilbrakes.com/
believe it or not, iron is the best performing metal for brake rotors. Bikes can get away with other metals, but cars are too heavy

R+C
Old 03-24-2006, 04:44 PM
  #24  
Bob Rouleau

Still plays with cars.
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Bob Rouleau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Montreal
Posts: 15,078
Received 256 Likes on 119 Posts
Default

www.stoptech.com has a good article about why cast iron is the best rotor material. After my PCCB "adventure" I agree with them!
Old 03-25-2006, 03:01 AM
  #25  
Ray G
Pro
 
Ray G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Seattle Area
Posts: 517
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Bob Rouleau
www.stoptech.com has a good article about why cast iron is the best rotor material. After my PCCB "adventure" I agree with them!
I think PCCB has superior performance compared to iron rotors - but they cost a hell of a lot more. So from a value point of view, iron is better. If money was no object, then I would want PCCBs.
Old 03-25-2006, 04:09 AM
  #26  
Nordschleife
Drifting
 
Nordschleife's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Munich
Posts: 2,722
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ray G
I think PCCB has superior performance compared to iron rotors - but they cost a hell of a lot more. So from a value point of view, iron is better. If money was no object, then I would want PCCBs.
Last year the world braking record in a street legal car was set by rather horrible looking modified Porsche 'Station Wagon' (Le 'Shooting' c'est tres du jour). The stock Porsche brakes were replaced by brakes built to the design of a German brake specialist. Iron rotors on aerograde Al hats, billet monobloc 6 piston callipers. These brakes gave better braking performance than the PCCBs.

The value in the PCCBs lies not in their retardation capability, which can be matched with iron rotors, but in their contribution to the reduction in unspruing, and overall weight.

As somebody who tests brakes, from time to time, I can explain that the best retardation figures are recorded when one gets on the brakes as hard as possible as soon as possible (that is once the decision to brake has been made). At first it is slightly puckering to brake with maximum effort at 300kph, but the effect is gratifying.

For those who are interested, the rotors used are cast at the same foundry that supplies Porsche, but their interior design is more sophisticated. The callipers are manufactured in house from single aero grade aluminium billets. Their design is optimised to reduce flex, cool brake fluid and apply high clamping force, their pads have a high surface area, greater than other callipers with more pistons.

R+C
Old 03-25-2006, 12:09 PM
  #27  
bora
Racer
 
bora's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 489
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ray G
I think PCCB has superior performance compared to iron rotors - but they cost a hell of a lot more. So from a value point of view, iron is better. If money was no object, then I would want PCCBs.
I had both on my car, I don't think you can tell the difference in terms of braking.
Old 03-27-2006, 12:35 AM
  #28  
Ray G
Pro
 
Ray G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Seattle Area
Posts: 517
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by bora
I had both on my car, I don't think you can tell the difference in terms of braking.
PCCBs have a much more linear friction response than iron. If you drive them back to back you will feel the difference. As I posted elsewhere, there are many advantages to ceramic rotors. I'm not saying they are appropriate for a passenger car.
Old 03-27-2006, 07:34 AM
  #29  
roberga
Nordschleife Master
 
roberga's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: SEATTLE
Posts: 5,165
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

here is the deal from my view: You can now make an informed decision. For me the biggest issue is and was the missinformation from Porsche regarding the wear issues on PCCB. I own part of it in that I did not research enough prior to my purchase. If I knew the real information on replacement it would have impacted what I paid for the car.
Old 03-27-2006, 11:26 AM
  #30  
bora
Racer
 
bora's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 489
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ray G
PCCBs have a much more linear friction response than iron. If you drive them back to back you will feel the difference. As I posted elsewhere, there are many advantages to ceramic rotors. I'm not saying they are appropriate for a passenger car.
I had both on my car and drove them back to back. I think the linear response you speak of has more to do with the pad compound than the rotor material IMHO.


Quick Reply: Should I buy Ceramic Brakes ?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 07:27 AM.