Notices
996 GT2/GT3 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

RSR crankcase breather

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-30-2005, 07:38 PM
  #46  
healeyg
Instructor
 
healeyg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Wilton, CT USA
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i heard it explained that you either want pressure or a vaccum, not neutral. this way, the o-rings are better seated, and the engine produces more power (holds better compression). dragsters use a vaccum principal. rsr, pressure
Old 10-31-2005, 11:34 AM
  #47  
Cupcar
Rennlist Member
 
Cupcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: California Boardwalk, Skanderborg Denmark
Posts: 3,682
Received 95 Likes on 63 Posts
Default

A data point of interest.

A friend had the RMS on his GT3 begin to leak and the dealer replaced it with the 996.102.264.92 RSR part number without any special request from my friend.

In fact, my friend asked if he could supply an RSR seal for them to use and was told they were already going to use one.

So, it appears from my friends experience that Porsche is using the RSR seal in leak repair orders.

Last edited by Cupcar; 10-31-2005 at 12:03 PM.
Old 10-31-2005, 06:18 PM
  #48  
Bill Verburg
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Bill Verburg's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 12,273
Received 517 Likes on 356 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by healeyg
i heard it explained that you either want pressure or a vaccum, not neutral. this way, the o-rings are better seated, and the engine produces more power (holds better compression). dragsters use a vaccum principal. rsr, pressure
Sorry but I don't but that at all

Any other theories? Increasing the partial vacuum in the c/c makes sense incresing the pressure will blow out all seals, I lost a set of 3.8 cylinder base seals that way.
Old 11-01-2005, 04:33 PM
  #49  
JW in Texas
Three Wheelin'
 
JW in Texas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Just North of "Big D"
Posts: 1,638
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

My guess is the RSR breather allows additional vacuum which puts added stress on the stock seal. The RSR seal is stiffer & more resistant to the flexing caused by the extra vacuum ie; the stock seal would flex in/out often enough with the extra vacuum, weakening the seal & causing it to eventually begin leaking when the car was stationary. What do you guys think?
Old 11-01-2005, 05:45 PM
  #50  
Bill Verburg
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Bill Verburg's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 12,273
Received 517 Likes on 356 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JW in Texas
My guess is the RSR breather allows additional vacuum which puts added stress on the stock seal. The RSR seal is stiffer & more resistant to the flexing caused by the extra vacuum ie; the stock seal would flex in/out often enough with the extra vacuum, weakening the seal & causing it to eventually begin leaking when the car was stationary. What do you guys think?
I think that makes sense
Old 11-01-2005, 06:50 PM
  #51  
Cupcar
Rennlist Member
 
Cupcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: California Boardwalk, Skanderborg Denmark
Posts: 3,682
Received 95 Likes on 63 Posts
Default

I think it is a problem only when the engine stops and the oil pressure goes to zero and there is residual vacuum in the crankcase. The lip of the seal is lifted by the vacuum and the full oil galleries above burp oil out past the seal.

The oil pressure behind the seal is what normally makes the seal work, and it is hard to imagine there could be enough vacuum generated to make a difference in seal pressure while the engine is running.
Old 11-01-2005, 07:13 PM
  #52  
Bill Verburg
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Bill Verburg's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 12,273
Received 517 Likes on 356 Posts
Default

That makes even more sense, thanks to all.
Old 11-02-2005, 01:19 AM
  #53  
JasonAndreas
Technical Guru
Rennlist Member

 
JasonAndreas's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: USVI
Posts: 8,138
Received 112 Likes on 90 Posts
Default

One thing I was told when I ordered the GT2-EVO FMS was that I could use the existing regular FMS seal but that it would whistle?
Old 11-06-2005, 05:24 PM
  #54  
JasonAndreas
Technical Guru
Rennlist Member

 
JasonAndreas's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: USVI
Posts: 8,138
Received 112 Likes on 90 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Cupcar#12
you should also use the Front main seal from the RS/RSR 996.102.264.92 advailable via PMSNA
996-102-264-92 is actually the rear main seal and NOT the FMS. Also, I was accidentally sent an RMS for the 993-GT2-EVO instead of the FMS (it has finally sunk into my head to no longer order anything without having the exact part number beforehand -- I now have two brand new RMSes), the GT2-EVO RMS is exactly the same as the 996-RSR version except for the part number. So could anyone that has installed the crankcase breather let me know if they have/have not installed a PMNA front main seal (i.e. behind the pulley -- see image below)? And if you have could you please post the part number (996/993/9XX)?

Old 11-06-2005, 11:36 PM
  #55  
Cupcar
Rennlist Member
 
Cupcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: California Boardwalk, Skanderborg Denmark
Posts: 3,682
Received 95 Likes on 63 Posts
Default

The nose seal or FMS part number is the same for a Cup or a GT3 street car and the same seal has been used for some years.
Old 11-07-2005, 09:29 PM
  #56  
JasonAndreas
Technical Guru
Rennlist Member

 
JasonAndreas's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: USVI
Posts: 8,138
Received 112 Likes on 90 Posts
Default

Thanks Cupcar! Feebie(?) at PMNA confirmed that the FMS is exactly the same on all the cars (964/993/GT3/996CUP/996RSR) so we only need to replace the RMS and not the FMS if we install the crankcase breather.

Last edited by JasonAndreas; 11-11-2005 at 04:07 AM. Reason: further info from PMNA
Old 03-13-2010, 07:44 AM
  #57  
DanH
Three Wheelin'
 
DanH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,450
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Interesting coming back to this thread after all this time. The 7GT3 runs the lower crankcase pressure and its the apparent cause of all the RMS leaks owners constantly battle with. Still for a free 8bhp seems a nice mod. What is the current thinking on the optimal RMS to use? Presumably the 7RS one? (leaky as it is)
Old 03-13-2010, 05:30 PM
  #58  
jmla
Rennlist Member
 
jmla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: West Hollywood, CA
Posts: 447
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I've done quite a bit of research on the subject and have not been able to find the elusive RSR RMS part number, I'm pretty certain that the RSR uses the old 996 TT/GT3/Cup seal (with inner spring). I have a crankcase breather installed and although I did see a bit of oil seepage around the seal (old 996 version), it never actually leaked onto the ground. I've since had two of the newer 997 seals installed and just like clockwork they both began to drip (onto the ground) within thirty days of installation. I plan to have the old 996 seal (999.113.426.41) installed when I have some money to burn.
Old 03-13-2010, 10:04 PM
  #59  
996FLT6
Rennlist Member
 
996FLT6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: san francisco
Posts: 14,023
Received 236 Likes on 192 Posts
Default

Jmla- seems like alot to do just to get 8hp. I imagine mite be a good mod if car was leaking and thusly necessary parts to put in for crankcase breather. Mike
Old 03-13-2010, 11:28 PM
  #60  
IPguy
Three Wheelin'
 
IPguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 1,281
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Still way cheaper on a $ per hp basis than any exhaust mod


Quick Reply: RSR crankcase breather



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 11:34 AM.