Notices
996 GT2/GT3 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Nürburgring: Stock GT3 ran 7:49

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-10-2005, 09:35 PM
  #16  
Jim H.
Pro
 
Jim H.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: U.S.
Posts: 565
Received 11 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

RSA333,

I believe power to weight ratios are an adequate way to classify cars into similar groups. However, the number of variables involved in who's fastest is far greater than simply a power to weight ratio. Of course, I agree that ALL ELSE BEING EQUAL, a car with a better power to weight ratio will probably be faster around a given track (i.e. a 3100lb GT3 vs a 2900lb GT3). Likewise, in cars that have the same power to weight ratio, the advantage will probably go to the lighter overall car on a twisty circuit and to the heavier car on a speed circuit.

In the end, if you can calculate the "physics" for all the variables, you're probably right, it is simple mathematics.

This is probably not earth shattering news to many people. Perhaps you were just kidding around?

cheers,
Old 02-10-2005, 10:26 PM
  #17  
rockitman
Nordschleife Master
 
rockitman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Got Revs ???
Posts: 5,735
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

wish I could drive my car that fast...
Old 02-10-2005, 11:55 PM
  #18  
Yargk
Rennlist Member
 
Yargk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: SF Bay Area, CA
Posts: 2,219
Received 226 Likes on 147 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cosmos
This is probably stupid, but you guys have been converting SAE #'s to DIN #'s to be fair, right? Cause that accounts for about 8-12hp difference.
I thought it was less than that.

GT3 381 hp DIN, 375 hp SAE 6 difference
Carrera GT 612 hp DIN, 605 hp SAE 7 difference
Old 02-11-2005, 12:05 AM
  #19  
brucegre
Banned
 
brucegre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: KY
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Maybe, and nope. The GT2 seems to be faster in the hands of the same driver (ask Bob Rouleau) but the TT is quite a bit slower (in my hands, I traded the TT for a GT3).

Part of the problem is physics, as in linear momemtum = mass X velocity. I cant speak for the GT2, but in the case of the TT, all the extra weight translates to slower in the corners as it tries to go in a straight line. There are a lot of other variables (chassis stiffness, suspension differences, RWD vs AWD) but the TT is a heavy car and feels like it. It is faster in a straight line, I wish I had the turbo motor in my GT3, but the twisties make all the difference.
Old 02-11-2005, 12:37 AM
  #20  
GrantG
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
GrantG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Denver
Posts: 17,771
Received 4,721 Likes on 2,691 Posts
Default

How could a Manthey 410 GT3 with R-rubber be only 8 secs faster than a stock GT3 on street tires? I would think the tires alone would be good for more than that...
Old 02-11-2005, 12:55 AM
  #21  
cosmos
Rennlist Member
 
cosmos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Between rock and hard place
Posts: 3,573
Received 1,002 Likes on 557 Posts
Default

They are not true R rubber. I have those tires and they fall short of the MPSC tire, but are better than the stock tires. I would say they are an in between of an R and an agressive ZR rated tire.

Great tire though, one of my favorites.
Old 02-11-2005, 03:38 PM
  #22  
Sun Ra
Drifting
 
Sun Ra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Way Back In, New Zealand
Posts: 2,493
Likes: 0
Received 56 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

the best line in the translation, thanks to Noel:

But that is only the half truth - almost achievement does not play the first violin.

i wish we could ge the same driver to do a gt2 lap
Old 02-11-2005, 04:02 PM
  #23  
macfly
Three Wheelin'
 
macfly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: LA, CA
Posts: 1,475
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I loved the translation, (thanks Noel!!) it was the funniest use of clashing words I've seen in a while, no wonder they call the site babblefish! Watt, from the info available on the web a stock GT2 is around 6-7 seconds a lap quicker than a stock 3 with both on MPS oem tires. I imagine that there is more room to tune a 2 because of the easy chip & turbo boost etc. Thus a fettled 2 is likely much faster than a fettled 3, as the Matheney itself showed, you can throw a lot of $$ at a 3 and only get a relatively small gain, while the same cash thrown at a 2 would likely make a much bigger gain, but the real question is would we ever be able to use it?

Talking of 'babblefish' this funny little thing came in today......made me smile anyway.

I cdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I was rdanieg. The phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid aoccdrnig to rscheearch taem at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoatnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit a porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Such a cdonition is arppoiately cllaed Typoglycemia -
Old 02-11-2005, 04:10 PM
  #24  
Sun Ra
Drifting
 
Sun Ra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Way Back In, New Zealand
Posts: 2,493
Likes: 0
Received 56 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

righteously amusing amdrqw olde sticke!!!!!!
Old 02-11-2005, 04:13 PM
  #25  
MetalSolid
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
MetalSolid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,643
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

!Ecxelelnt
Old 02-11-2005, 04:59 PM
  #26  
CodeRed
Rennlist Member
 
CodeRed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Santa monica
Posts: 1,327
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Try this site http://www.systransoft.com/
Old 02-11-2005, 05:04 PM
  #27  
vegasgolf98
Racer
 
vegasgolf98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Henderson, NV
Posts: 473
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

ttolaly azamnig!
Old 02-11-2005, 05:15 PM
  #28  
Sun Ra
Drifting
 
Sun Ra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Way Back In, New Zealand
Posts: 2,493
Likes: 0
Received 56 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CodeRed

ésos son los pechos más finos que he visto siempre
Old 07-07-2005, 11:14 AM
  #29  
frayed
Race Car
 
frayed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,972
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

A lot of people quote a 7.54 or sometimes a 7.56 number for the mkII gt3, and folks on this board say that those numbers are not official laptimes from Porsche/Rohrl. (Usually when people compare the GT3 to the 997S citing virtually identical performance)

Anyone know the genesis of the 7.54? Is it simply fabricated?
Old 07-07-2005, 01:21 PM
  #30  
Sun Ra
Drifting
 
Sun Ra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Way Back In, New Zealand
Posts: 2,493
Likes: 0
Received 56 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by frayed
A lot of people quote a 7.54 or sometimes a 7.56 number for the mkII gt3, and folks on this board say that those numbers are not official laptimes from Porsche/Rohrl. (Usually when people compare the GT3 to the 997S citing virtually identical performance)

Anyone know the genesis of the 7.54? Is it simply fabricated?
http://www.track-challenge.com/main_e.asp


Quick Reply: Nürburgring: Stock GT3 ran 7:49



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 03:16 PM.