Notices
996 GT2/GT3 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Just a thought with 997?Drag coefficient

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-31-2004, 02:52 AM
  #31  
cosmos
Rennlist Member
 
cosmos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Between rock and hard place
Posts: 3,765
Received 1,163 Likes on 638 Posts
Default

Karl,

What size wheel and tire did you run on the rear?
Old 07-31-2004, 03:07 AM
  #32  
Karl S
Burning Brakes
 
Karl S's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 1,163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

11" wheel with 305/30/18 Hoosier S03. However, the GT3 sits lower than my 996, so I suggest you check with a knowledgeable wheel & tire place before buying to make sure this will fit without interference.
Old 07-31-2004, 08:13 AM
  #33  
BrianPA
Racer
 
BrianPA's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Karl S
I wasn't referring to the shocks and springs. I don't think too many people would buy a street car with 1600 lb springs or be able to use remote reservoir adjustable shocks. Note that the rear track on the 997 is much wider than the 996, which means longer control arms, track rods, etc. This changes the suspension geometry, including pick up points.

Ever wonder why the GT3 RSR has wide fender flares? It's not just because it runs a wider tire than the Cup car, it's because it has a completely different suspension that gives it a wider track than the Cup car.

I'm not claiming the GT3 RSR and the 997 share any interchangeable parts. But I have been told by a racer who is close to the factory that the rear suspension design on the 997 is new and borrows heavily from the design of the GT3 RSR. As a result, the 997 has much more bite coming out of a corner, which allows it to get the power down sooner. I think this plus the stiffer chassis was the biggest contributor to the improved lap times of the 997.

Karl
If this is the reason and the argument for the ridiculous 7.59 laptime (or whatever it was) then shouldn't the 997 (non S) also show significant gains over the regular 996? If i remember correctly it was only 1 second faster. If this huge jump in lap time is all about handling then why isnt the 997 (non S) making up any ground?
Old 07-31-2004, 12:03 PM
  #34  
Karl S
Burning Brakes
 
Karl S's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 1,163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Horsepower for one. Tire contact patch for another.

Karl



Quick Reply: Just a thought with 997?Drag coefficient



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 03:33 AM.