MCS suspension
#1
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Hi,
I recently picked up gen 1 MCS 2 way suspension with compression and rebound adjustments for my 996 turbo.
Current setup:
150 PSI front and rear canisters
700# springs in front
900# springs in back
compression, 12 in front, 12 in rear
rebound, 15 in front, 16 in rear.
The car is setup primarily as a track car. Rear wheel drive with a guards LSD pushing about 600 wheel HP at 1.5 bar. When at speed it feels a little soft / bouncy in the the turns when there are undulations. Is anyone familiar or have suggestions with MCS suspension settings?
Thanks! Karim
I recently picked up gen 1 MCS 2 way suspension with compression and rebound adjustments for my 996 turbo.
Current setup:
150 PSI front and rear canisters
700# springs in front
900# springs in back
compression, 12 in front, 12 in rear
rebound, 15 in front, 16 in rear.
The car is setup primarily as a track car. Rear wheel drive with a guards LSD pushing about 600 wheel HP at 1.5 bar. When at speed it feels a little soft / bouncy in the the turns when there are undulations. Is anyone familiar or have suggestions with MCS suspension settings?
Thanks! Karim
#4
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I have the same car with JRZ RS pros. I started off with the 800/1000 and had that same effect. I then went to 225/250 tenders and 1000/1200 and the car responded much better. Don’t be afraid to run high spring rates as the shocks are designed for them 👍
#5
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Last edited by Karim6474; 03-27-2023 at 09:27 PM.
The following users liked this post:
Karim6474 (03-27-2023)
#7
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
You’re the first person I’ve heard being up that concern. I’ll tag @powderhound John Sellinger. If someone would know about that issue, he would.
Trending Topics
#8
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Have never heard of that issue. I have run 1100 rates in the rear with just a techquipment bar which adds no rigidity to the chassis as it mounts to the seatbelt holes. The 996 GT3/turbo chassis is already plenty stiff especially compared to other 20 year old vehicles out there.
#9
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Have never heard of that issue. I have run 1100 rates in the rear with just a techquipment bar which adds no rigidity to the chassis as it mounts to the seatbelt holes. The 996 GT3/turbo chassis is already plenty stiff especially compared to other 20 year old vehicles out there.