Notices
996 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:

2002 c4s front end sits higher than rear

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-16-2016, 09:37 PM
  #1  
About2Bite
Track Day
Thread Starter
 
About2Bite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 2002 c4s front end sits higher than rear

Is this common? Mine looks like it has a reverse rake.

69k miles

Name:  20160606_141025.jpg
Views: 724
Size:  272.3 KB
Old 06-16-2016, 09:39 PM
  #2  
Triple Black
Rennlist Member
 
Triple Black's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,087
Received 72 Likes on 44 Posts
Default

A pic would help.
Old 06-16-2016, 09:44 PM
  #3  
Chicago Pete
Instructor
 
Chicago Pete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Here is a pic of my 2002 C4S, it sits pretty even I think.
Old 06-16-2016, 09:46 PM
  #4  
About2Bite
Track Day
Thread Starter
 
About2Bite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Looks great, that's stock suspension?
Old 06-16-2016, 09:56 PM
  #5  
Chicago Pete
Instructor
 
Chicago Pete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by About2Bite
Looks great, that's stock suspension?
Yes sir.
Old 06-16-2016, 10:13 PM
  #6  
kmagnuss
Burning Brakes
 
kmagnuss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Englewood, FL
Posts: 1,187
Received 16 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Take a couple seconds and think for a minute why the rear would sit lower than the front on a 12+ year old 911.
Old 06-16-2016, 10:22 PM
  #7  
fpb111
Rennlist Member
 
fpb111's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Northern NJ
Posts: 5,535
Received 93 Likes on 69 Posts
Default

He took the cement blocks out of the frunk?
Old 06-16-2016, 11:23 PM
  #8  
jj1
Racer
 
jj1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 378
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Looks like a very unflattering camera angle. Exacerbates the wheel to fender gap. Chicago Petes angle is pretty much the exact opposite.
Old 06-16-2016, 11:39 PM
  #9  
Tonyr313
Instructor
 
Tonyr313's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Was this photo taken at Porsche Atlanta perimeter Jim Ellis
Old 06-17-2016, 12:37 AM
  #10  
OKB
Three Wheelin'
 
OKB's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 1,856
Likes: 0
Received 52 Likes on 40 Posts
Default

thats why everybody wants lowering springs
Old 06-17-2016, 12:42 AM
  #11  
Dennis C
Rocky Mountain High
Rennlist Member
 
Dennis C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Colorado
Posts: 17,118
Received 1,248 Likes on 783 Posts
Default

I think it's common in the USA to raise the front bumper high enough to meet government front impact crash requirements. I could be wrong on this, but I thought I read it somewhere in the past.
Old 06-17-2016, 07:59 AM
  #12  
fpena944
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
fpena944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 9,379
Received 85 Likes on 54 Posts
Default

Ok since no one else has just come out and said it - it is quite likely that due to the age of your car the suspension is in need of a refresh. Given that most of the weight is in the rear of the car that is where it'll sag the most.

Update your suspension and you'll get the car looking right again.
Old 06-17-2016, 09:32 AM
  #13  
Silk
Pro
 
Silk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 625
Received 47 Likes on 37 Posts
Default

I suggest you set your car on a level surface and measure the distances from the ground to the fender lips for the four wheels. Then you have something to compare. From a picture is difficult to assess.
Old 06-17-2016, 09:33 AM
  #14  
jj1
Racer
 
jj1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 378
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Take a straight side shot. I don't think there is any rake. The side molding looks equidistant to the ground front and rear. It's a bad camera angle and these cars have a HUGE gender gap on factory US suspension. Furthermore I'm not convinced having a rear engine would make the rear sag more than the front even if it had 200k on the clock. The front springs are MUCH softer and likely get more abused than the rear. I would think the soft front springs see more abuse from braking than the suitably stiffer rear spring/ shock combo see from a engine sitting there.
Old 06-17-2016, 11:00 AM
  #15  
ejdoherty911
Three Wheelin'
 
ejdoherty911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 1,419
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Cannot determine anything from that angle. Here's what stock looks like.







Quick Reply: 2002 c4s front end sits higher than rear



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:32 PM.