Notices
996 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:

Ex Porsche Plonker

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-03-2014, 02:43 PM
  #1  
03996
Racer
Thread Starter
 
03996's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angry Ex Porsche Plonker

As if the rep of the 996 wasn't bad enough (NOT to those who understand of course) but now this guy from Porsche adds another nail in the coffin......not syaing he's not right about the turbo but it's the rest of the story that pisses me off.........

http://jalopnik.com/here-s-why-the-9...-ca-1665776219
Old 12-03-2014, 02:56 PM
  #2  
DK570
Racer
 
DK570's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 280
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

He says good things...

Originally Posted by Doug DeMuro
For those of you who aren't aware of the 996 model, allow me to explain: this was the 911 sold from 1999 to 2005. It's sleek, and it's fast, and it's fun to drive, and it's cheap to buy, and to most casual observers its styling is approximately identical to every other 911, which is to say: it looks like the kind of thing your dad might buy when he starts to lose his hair.
I think he's funny. Who else would imagine putting a prairie dog in a blender??

Originally Posted by Doug DeMuro
If IMS is done tell him to drive like hell and enjoy. I think if I weren't writing/needing something weird to write about, I would have an IMS-replaced 996 and I'd just drive it constantly.
Old 12-03-2014, 03:11 PM
  #3  
5CHN3LL
Race Director
 
5CHN3LL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: SOcialist republic of CALifornia
Posts: 10,423
Received 213 Likes on 157 Posts
Default

Sweet. A little more negative press, and prices should be low enough for me to pick up a second 996 (a cab for the wife)...
Old 12-03-2014, 03:15 PM
  #4  
Kalashnikov
Three Wheelin'
 
Kalashnikov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 1,470
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Everything he said in the article is true. His IMS "hypothetical story" is exactly what happened to Cuda this weekend, so there isn't much to fault in the article. Is 996TT vastly superior to the regular 996? Yes. Is 996TT a phenomenal bargain due to association with 996 N/A? Yes.

If 996 N/A did not have the motor issues it has, and had a bulletproof "honda/toyota" motor, the value of the cars would be 2X of what it is today.


To begin, let's address that engine issue. What I'm referring to here is the "intermediate shaft," also known as the "IMS," which is a famous late-1990s and early-2000s Porsche problem where you'd be driving along one day, top down, sun out, birds chirping, wind in your hair, and all of a sudden your engine would make noises like you just stuck a prairie dog down a blender. So you'd get out to check the situation, and you'd have your car towed into a mechanic, and you'd discover that your engine is now trash, but would you like to replace it for $20,000?
Old 12-03-2014, 04:08 PM
  #5  
Spokayman
Rennlist Member
 
Spokayman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Southern Arizona
Posts: 1,384
Received 24 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Kalashnikov
Everything he said in the article is true. His IMS "hypothetical story" is exactly what happened to Cuda this weekend, so there isn't much to fault in the article.
To begin, let's address that engine issue. What I'm referring to here is the "intermediate shaft," also known as the "IMS," which is a famous late-1990s and early-2000s Porsche problem where you'd be driving along one day, top down, sun out, birds chirping, wind in your hair, and all of a sudden your engine would make noises like you just stuck a prairie dog down a blender. So you'd get out to check the situation, and you'd have your car towed into a mechanic, and you'd discover that your engine is now trash, but would you like to replace it for $20,000?
Except that what happened to Cuda's car was probably NOT an IMS failure.
Re-read that thread if you need to.
Old 12-03-2014, 04:47 PM
  #6  
03996
Racer
Thread Starter
 
03996's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DK570
He says good things...?
He, as a one-time Porsche employee, COULD have mentioned that the IMS problems, although real, are quite small in number relative to the total volume of cars produced and still surviving, untouched!

He COULD have mentioned that this was the car that saved Porshce's ***.

He could have provided genuine support to a great car but no, he lovs the turbo but nothing positive about the rest of the breed...........turd!
Old 12-03-2014, 06:13 PM
  #7  
riddler777
Racer
 
riddler777's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Latvia, Riga
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I was just wondering, everyone is praising the turbo and GT3 and all other metzger engine models

but my car (996C2 1998) is 380 000km vehicle, and its engine suffered the catastrofical damage, but that wasnt the IMS that killed it, but a spun bearing,

so maybe the reality isn't SO bad after all, and doesnt the turbo have rod bearings? - sure it does and they also wear away, maybe turbo's lubrication system is better and they last longer, but in the end they WILL spin as well, ok at what mileage, that is a different question, but that is inevitable. (unless you are prepared for a full engine servicing, to give it a second life)

I assume, only assume, that most of the engine failiours are due to improper servicing (those long oil change periods) and total neglect of the car, not looking after oil level that leads to oil starvation and these damages as well. not trying to offend anyone here, but speaking about overall car public.



Quick Reply: Ex Porsche Plonker



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:41 PM.