Notices
996 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:

Tire recommendation

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-11-2014, 04:53 PM
  #16  
VA951
Instructor
 
VA951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: No. Va.
Posts: 231
Received 13 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

N4 is no good, it must be N5 or better...
Old 09-11-2014, 05:45 PM
  #17  
alpine003
Banned
 
alpine003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 7,697
Likes: 0
Received 29 Likes on 26 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by VA951
N4 is no good, it must be N5 or better...
If you get N5, you MUST get the n5 spec rated Porsche approved blinker fluid as well or it just plain won't stick and work like it should due to the massive grip of the N5 tires.
Old 09-11-2014, 05:53 PM
  #18  
5CHN3LL
Race Director
 
5CHN3LL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: SOcialist republic of CALifornia
Posts: 10,423
Received 214 Likes on 157 Posts
Default

You're the only person I know who uses the term "catastrophic engine failure" so often that an acronym is required...

Originally Posted by KrazyK
All informed M96 996 owners MUST use JG DT40 or risk CEF.
Old 09-11-2014, 05:55 PM
  #19  
alpine003
Banned
 
alpine003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 7,697
Likes: 0
Received 29 Likes on 26 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 5CHN3LL
You're the only person I know who uses the term "catastrophic engine failure" so often that an acronym is required...
So that's what it stands for. I was wondering about that for a sec. Thought it could've been "curious engine future" or something...
Old 09-11-2014, 05:56 PM
  #20  
DTMiller
Rennlist Member
 
DTMiller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Summit Point, probably
Posts: 3,598
Received 337 Likes on 180 Posts
Default

Probably the window regulator or a micro switch.
Old 09-11-2014, 08:12 PM
  #21  
Dennis C
Rocky Mountain High
Rennlist Member
 
Dennis C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Colorado
Posts: 17,643
Received 1,575 Likes on 986 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 5CHN3LL
^^ Cheap tires is kind of a broad brush to use to describe a LOT of tires out there. My set of Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 XL tires probably falls under the "cheap" heading, but they are great tires.
You're right - that is a broad brush. What exactly defines a "cheap" tire?

In my mind, I classified tires for my 996 as follows:

Cheap = under $1,000 for all four tires, installed
Moderate = $1,000 - $1,500 for all four tires, installed
Expensive = over $1,500 for all four tires, installed

The only tire that I ever used on my 996 that fell into my cheap category was the Sumitomo HTR ZIII. They were fine for a while, but the car didn't handle as well as it does on some other tires and they were horrendously noisy after about 7,000 miles.

The only tire that I ever used that fell into my moderate category was the Hankook Ventus at just over $1,000 for a set. I liked it better than the Sumitomo, but the car didn't feel as "planted" and stable during cornering as it did with Michelins. The tread life was better than the Sumis and it wasn't quite as loud as it wore. I rate my experience with them as okay.

In the expensive category, I've used Pirelli P Zero and Michelin Pilot Sport PS2s. As previously mentioned, I love the PS2s. They provide the best combination of ride quality, quiet operation, looks and handling. I hated the P Zeros. They had horrendous tread life and they were horribly noisy. They handled very well, but they were howling at less then 5,000 miles.

On my scale, the Michelin Pilot SuperSport would fall into the moderate category. They are available in the proper sizes for my new 997 TT, and I will probably go with that tire when the time comes.

Tire selection is a very subjective thing. You'll find some people love a certain tire and some people hate it. Look in the customer reviews section at www.tirerack.com and you'll usually find a good cross section of people who have given reviews.
Old 09-11-2014, 11:22 PM
  #22  
Bg8780
2nd Gear
Thread Starter
 
Bg8780's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks for the feedback guys.

DTMiller, The car is in Northeast Ohio but he mostly drives it in during the summer and a bit in the fall. Therefore, cold weather performance isn't important. I didn't check the exact model of his current Continental's so I'm not sure.

Dennis, your input on the P Zero's matches up with most of what I have read about them, noise and tread life. I will look into the PS2's. I wish they made PSS's in his sizes, I already have my eye on them as my next tire. I've struggled to find a bad review of the PSS.
Old 09-12-2014, 12:32 AM
  #23  
RobResico
2nd Gear
 
RobResico's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I just purchased an '03 Carrera 4S, almost three-weeks ago, and the car had a "newer" set of Pirelli P-Zero Rosso's, with the nice red lettering. Within one-week of getting the car, I ran over a screw and needed to replace the tire. One-week later, Discount received the replacement P-Zero and installed it.... Later that evening, I looked at the tire and realized that it did not have that cool red lettering..... I called Pirelli, and they do not manufacture these tires with red lettering anymore, which leads me to believe that the dealer I purchased my car from put on the cheapest set of tires available to him at a discounted price, so I ended up ordering all new tires. I read a Car & Driver review, which popped up when searching for the Pirelli tires, and they placed 9th in this review... However, I didn't want to spend $400+ for each rear Michelin PS2 (and $260 for the fronts (each)), and found the second best tires -- the Bridgestone Potenza S-04s -- to meet my satisfaction. Each rear was only $261, and the front $159. I had Potenza's before, and they lasted much longer than the Dunlop's that were on my R-32. I have had Michelin's before, a couple of times, on my E39, and have had an excellent experience; however, knowing that I somehow talked my wife into letting me get this car, I was not about to spend a ton of money on the PS2s! The Potenza's are much grippier and way more quite than the Pirelli's!

I recommend doing your research!

Regards,

Robert
Old 09-12-2014, 12:39 AM
  #24  
RobResico
2nd Gear
 
RobResico's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I forgot to mention... Discount hooked me up with the "newer" Pirelli's: 75 for each front and 80 for the rear, which made this transaction that much smoother, and they transferred the certificates I purchased for all Pirelli tires over to the Potenza's!

And, the "Second Best" tire falls within Dennis's "Cheap" category!

I'm surprised that nobody else had discussed these tires! [At least Potenza's!] **EDIT** Sorry, Ahsai! You did mention the S02A - however, according to Discount, Bridgestone is no longer making these (phasing them out for the S04), and they will not be available in the 295 width, like the S02s.... The one positive for me, according to Discount, is that the S04s have a better tire composition, so they should last longer than the S02s.... I would not have a problem running an S02 with an S04, but I personally would not split up tire manufacturers....

Last edited by RobResico; 09-12-2014 at 01:26 AM. Reason: mis-stated/oversight
Old 09-12-2014, 12:46 AM
  #25  
Ahsai
Nordschleife Master
 
Ahsai's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 7,328
Received 67 Likes on 52 Posts
Default

I did in post #6. Very happy with my Potenza S02A. The best part is they are still being manufactured these days. A lot of models will obsolete once you get your rears worn out, you won't be able to get the same model to match the fronts. I went through conti contact sport 2 to michelin sport rib to Potenza.

The first two were NLA by the time I needed new rear tires. I was forced to through away my 50% good front tires.
Old 09-12-2014, 04:55 AM
  #26  
pfbz
Rennlist Member
 
pfbz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: US
Posts: 7,724
Received 2,895 Likes on 1,538 Posts
Default

Another vote for Hankook Ventus V12's...

I was impressed with them on track and off. Great tire, would do them again in a second. IMHO the key is also getting the right suspension alignment and front/back tire width balance...
Old 09-13-2014, 11:17 AM
  #27  
ALE
Rennlist Member
 
ALE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 481
Received 62 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

I've had good experiences with both the Bridgestone SO2A & S04PP. For my next purchase, I will only buy tires that do as well as these, but that can be rotated (side to side) without having to remove and re-mount the tires. If you track your car, this rotation will add tire life.
The S02As are uni-directional, but the S04PPs can be swapped from side to side at home.

Last edited by ALE; 09-13-2014 at 11:26 AM. Reason: update
Old 09-13-2014, 11:33 AM
  #28  
sjfehr
Drifting
 
sjfehr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Chesapeake, VA
Posts: 3,029
Received 66 Likes on 56 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dennis C
You're right - that is a broad brush. What exactly defines a "cheap" tire?

In my mind, I classified tires for my 996 as follows:

Cheap = under $1,000 for all four tires, installed
Moderate = $1,000 - $1,500 for all four tires, installed
Expensive = over $1,500 for all four tires, installed

The only tire that I ever used on my 996 that fell into my cheap category was the Sumitomo HTR ZIII. They were fine for a while, but the car didn't handle as well as it does on some other tires and they were horrendously noisy after about 7,000 miles.

The only tire that I ever used that fell into my moderate category was the Hankook Ventus at just over $1,000 for a set. I liked it better than the Sumitomo, but the car didn't feel as "planted" and stable during cornering as it did with Michelins. The tread life was better than the Sumis and it wasn't quite as loud as it wore. I rate my experience with them as okay.

In the expensive category, I've used Pirelli P Zero and Michelin Pilot Sport PS2s. As previously mentioned, I love the PS2s. They provide the best combination of ride quality, quiet operation, looks and handling. I hated the P Zeros. They had horrendous tread life and they were horribly noisy. They handled very well, but they were howling at less then 5,000 miles.

On my scale, the Michelin Pilot SuperSport would fall into the moderate category. They are available in the proper sizes for my new 997 TT, and I will probably go with that tire when the time comes.

Tire selection is a very subjective thing. You'll find some people love a certain tire and some people hate it. Look in the customer reviews section at www.tirerack.com and you'll usually find a good cross section of people who have given reviews.
Price does NOT equal performance, especially when it comes to tires; some of the cheapest tires outperform the most expensive in many tests- HTRZIII for instance. What you're going to find is a myraid of tire manufacturers out there, each of which create tires with different compromises between grip/longevity, cold/hot performance, wet/dry performance, etc. For a Porsche, I'd ignore any tire test that includes "comfort" as a qualitative factor- the characteristics that make a tire comfortable are terrible for performance. The ones with "N" stamped on the sites will just gouge the crap out of you because they know they can and you'll pay it.

There have been some significant advances in tread compound the past two years: I would not buy a tire today that's a more than 2 year old design. If you're interested in grip & street performance, the top tires right now are Hankook R-S3 & Dunlop ZII*, BF Goodrich Rival; all of which are what TireRack considers "Extreme Performance" with 200TW, take advantage of the new tread compound technology, and do great both cold and wet. Bridgestone RE-11A is good as well. I've heard really great things about (dirt cheap) Federal 595R-SR, but don't know much about them. Michelin PSS and PS2 aren't even in the same performance category, as they're a severe compromise for mass consumption for people who want the image of a luxury car but care little about the actual performance; you can do much better.

Further, don't be afraid to consider slightly different tire sizes than OEM; there are a lot of size tires will fit on OEM wheels, some sizes of which will give better than OEM performance.
Old 09-13-2014, 01:06 PM
  #29  
Dennis C
Rocky Mountain High
Rennlist Member
 
Dennis C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Colorado
Posts: 17,643
Received 1,575 Likes on 986 Posts
Default

I agree. My rating system was subjective, based on my experience with my car. I thought the Sumitomos were terrible. I also thought the Pirellis were terrible, and they were much more expensive. I don't like the PS2 the best because of the price, I like it the best because of the way my car handles and performs when I use that tire. I'm open to trying any new tire, which is evident by my experience with different tires.
Old 09-13-2014, 02:17 PM
  #30  
sds911
Rennlist Member
 
sds911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 208
Received 11 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

If you want a more comfortable ride and good all season performance (even light snow) -- I've been very pleased with my Continental DWS tires -- the rears are just starting to show wear to the bars on the inside after 20,000 miles (which seems to be about double the summer high performance tires). If on the other hand, you want summer performance tires check out TireRack videos as they rate the top brands for handling, comfort etc. It seems that Michelin and Bridgestone always do well on their tests.

I like Michelin tires and have them on my other car, but with the 40 AE they were simply too firm for a daily driver and had no snow/winter capability at all.


Quick Reply: Tire recommendation



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:42 PM.