Notices
996 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:

questions re PSM and S version

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-21-2014, 01:10 AM
  #1  
pantdino
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
pantdino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default questions re PSM and S version

Sorry if these bits of info are available easily, but I'm not finding them

1) When did PSM become standard or so common that it was basically so?
2) How much faster around a racetrack is the S version of a C2 compared with a non-S of the same year? Is the 3.6 liter non-S significantly quicker than the earlier 3.4 liter?

Thanks in advance
Old 01-21-2014, 02:31 AM
  #2  
CarlosCA
Advanced
 
CarlosCA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: NoCal
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Not sure on #1.

No "C2S" as far as I know in either 996.1 or 996.2. 3.8l engine in the "S" config of C2 became available w/ 997.1 in 2005.

996 C4S is (as a Rennlister pointed out to me) probably slower than most base coupes simply because of extra weight but same engine.

Cheers -
Old 01-21-2014, 07:28 AM
  #3  
DaveCarrera4
Three Wheelin'
 
DaveCarrera4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 1,814
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CarlosCA
Not sure on #1.

No "C2S" as far as I know in either 996.1 or 996.2. 3.8l engine in the "S" config of C2 became available w/ 997.1 in 2005.

996 C4S is (as a Rennlister pointed out to me) probably slower than most base coupes simply because of extra weight but same engine.

Cheers -
Correct, no C2S. C4S may be just slightly slower in a straight line, but upgraded turbo suspension and brakes and fatter tires make it beat lap times on twisty tracks.
Old 01-21-2014, 09:47 AM
  #4  
Spinout
Burning Brakes
 
Spinout's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: York SC
Posts: 812
Received 25 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Food for though.....A 996 w/the X51 power kit (345HP) would be within 10 HP of a 997.1 Carrera S (355HP). Those 2 cars should be comparable if the stock suspension of the 996 were slightly upgraded to the sports suspension of the 997S, right?
Old 01-21-2014, 10:23 AM
  #5  
Sneaky Pete
Rennlist Member
 
Sneaky Pete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Mooresville, IN (Life Long Cheesehead)
Posts: 5,815
Likes: 0
Received 54 Likes on 35 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Spinout
Food for though.....A 996 w/the X51 power kit (345HP) would be within 10 HP of a 997.1 Carrera S (355HP). Those 2 cars should be comparable if the stock suspension of the 996 were slightly upgraded to the sports suspension of the 997S, right?
Sure I guess on paper. The big variable is the driver. I have seen plenty a slow car having the tires driven off passing everything in sight by a driver with good skills. More so than a fast car with a slow driver.
Old 01-21-2014, 10:34 AM
  #6  
Dennis C
Rocky Mountain High
Rennlist Member
 
Dennis C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Colorado
Posts: 17,135
Received 1,259 Likes on 790 Posts
Default

PSM is a standard feature on all AWD variants of the 996.

In Porsche's internal testing, the 996 C4S was approximately 4 seconds faster around the Nurburgring than the C2. Most people attribute this to the suspension, larger tires and brakes (the engine is the same as the C2, as previously mentioned). I'll try to find a link to the test and I'll post it if I can find it. I know there's a reference to it in Excellence Magazine in the past.
Old 01-21-2014, 12:57 PM
  #7  
Dennis C
Rocky Mountain High
Rennlist Member
 
Dennis C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Colorado
Posts: 17,135
Received 1,259 Likes on 790 Posts
Default

Still looking. I found this link, but I'm not sure if it's a comparison of late model 996s or early model 997s.

Nordschleife Lap Records

In this article, times are posted for a 2004 911 Carrera, as well as a 2004 911 Carrera S. The only Carrera S in the 996 series was the C4S. Both cars are driven by Walter Rohrl. The 911 Carrera completes the circuit in 8:15.00 with a top speed of 150 kmh. The 911 Carrera S completes the circuit in 7:59.00 with a top speed of 155 kmh.

I find it hard to believe that there would be such a discrepancy between a 996 C2 and a 996 C4S, which leads me to think that this may be early 997 cars. I will try to find the link to the 996 information or to confirm that these are, in fact, the 996 times.

EDIT: Upon further review, it appears that these are 997 times, not 996 times. It looks like the 996 MK I and MK II 911 Carrera posted an 8:17.00 time. I don't see the C4S in this comparison.
Old 01-21-2014, 01:11 PM
  #8  
alpine003
Banned
 
alpine003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 7,697
Likes: 0
Received 26 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Sneaky Pete
Sure I guess on paper. The big variable is the driver. I have seen plenty a slow car having the tires driven off passing everything in sight by a driver with good skills. More so than a fast car with a slow driver.
+996, plus it's a moot point on these forums anyways since friends don't let friends drive stock. Especially on the 996 platform which has one of the least investment potentials, why leave it stock?
Old 01-21-2014, 01:16 PM
  #9  
Dennis C
Rocky Mountain High
Rennlist Member
 
Dennis C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Colorado
Posts: 17,135
Received 1,259 Likes on 790 Posts
Default

I remember seeing a video about 10 years ago when the Cayenne was launched. In the video, Cass Whitehead and a few other Porsche team drivers were doing laps in a V6 Cayenne. They were easily keeping up with, and sometimes passing 996s on the track. It definitely proves that the driver is the biggest factor when comparing lap times.
Old 01-21-2014, 02:03 PM
  #10  
petonic
Instructor
 
petonic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: San Francisco & Pt Reyes Station California
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I had my PSM switch on for the first time this weekend. Roads were dry (California this winter) and temp was 40 degF. Took a slightly spirited left hander, and the PSM kicked in. Funky feeling. '04 911TTx50.

In the past, I've thrown the car into corners as if it were my mother in law, and no PSM activation. It happened again a couple of minutes later in another left hander.

My wife's AMG CL55 seems to have its traction control come on whenever you accelerate over debris or whatever. But the Porsche, I'd never had it come on.

I thought, perhaps, since both instances happened on left hand turns, perhaps one side of my tires had low inflation. Nope. All within spec.

I used to run 36f and 44r for pressure, but have recently run 36f and 40r. Wonder if that could do it?
Old 01-21-2014, 02:49 PM
  #11  
alpine003
Banned
 
alpine003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 7,697
Likes: 0
Received 26 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dennis C
Nordschleife Lap Records

Both cars are driven by Walter Rohrl.
I believe Walter holds the record for the fastest Tractor around the "Green Hell" as well. lol.

Old 01-21-2014, 03:03 PM
  #12  
Dennis C
Rocky Mountain High
Rennlist Member
 
Dennis C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Colorado
Posts: 17,135
Received 1,259 Likes on 790 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by petonic
I had my PSM switch on for the first time this weekend. Roads were dry (California this winter) and temp was 40 degF. Took a slightly spirited left hander, and the PSM kicked in. Funky feeling. '04 911TTx50.

In the past, I've thrown the car into corners as if it were my mother in law, and no PSM activation. It happened again a couple of minutes later in another left hander.

My wife's AMG CL55 seems to have its traction control come on whenever you accelerate over debris or whatever. But the Porsche, I'd never had it come on.

I thought, perhaps, since both instances happened on left hand turns, perhaps one side of my tires had low inflation. Nope. All within spec.

I used to run 36f and 44r for pressure, but have recently run 36f and 40r. Wonder if that could do it?
If you're running summer tires in 40-degree weather, that could do it.
Old 01-21-2014, 05:41 PM
  #13  
perryinva
Burning Brakes
 
perryinva's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 1,138
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Yep, they would be much slicker at 40F than at 70F. The PSM on my '02 C2 used to kick in all the time with the Sumitomo's on it, but never kicks in with the PS2s.
Old 01-21-2014, 06:18 PM
  #14  
petonic
Instructor
 
petonic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: San Francisco & Pt Reyes Station California
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Dennis & Perry -- thanks for the data points. I'm running Hankook's Ventus V12's, and I believe they are more summer tire than anything. I should mention that it was only after about 5 minutes of driving, and the ambient temperature before then was in the mid to low-30s. Totally makes sense. No further issues so far with PSM, and like I said, my tires are properly inflated. I'll just be mindful in colder weather -- even if it's not less than 32 degF.
Old 01-21-2014, 06:20 PM
  #15  
porrsha
Race Director
 
porrsha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Green Cove Springs, FL
Posts: 10,996
Received 55 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pantdino
Sorry if these bits of info are available easily, but I'm not finding them

1) When did PSM become standard or so common that it was basically so?
2) How much faster around a racetrack is the S version of a C2 compared with a non-S of the same year? Is the 3.6 liter non-S significantly quicker than the earlier 3.4 liter?

Thanks in advance
The PSM button/function was the bane of my existence back when they became stock with the first 996's. I traded in a 993 that did not have PSM, had a 1972 911 before that and always left foot braked for autocross. That triggers the PSM to come on even if you have the button turned off.

After removing fuses, talking to PCNA, tech advisor, etc I had to adjust my driving style. The GT-3 997 I had also had PSM but the limits were adjusted upwards and I could left foot brake with it. That is one fast ride and never found the need to activate the PSM.

My 2001 CS2 was the fastest time of day for street Porsches at 2 autocrosses this summer except for a guy in a 997 GT-3. I beat a good driver in a 997 on both occaisions.

The best thing you can do is learn to drive your car well at a DE or local autocross then figure out what it needs.


Quick Reply: questions re PSM and S version



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 03:10 AM.