Notices
996 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:

How To: Convert your AWD 996 to RWD

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-17-2017, 04:27 PM
  #31  
Andrewck
Instructor
 
Andrewck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Denver
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I am looking to undertake this project and turn my C4S into a "C2S". Not having a garage or access to air tools, is there anybody in the Denver area that would be interested in lending a hand or space for the conversion?
Old 11-08-2017, 04:09 PM
  #32  
Sammy Bono
6th Gear
 
Sammy Bono's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Pm sent thanks for all the info captain!!!!
Old 11-08-2017, 11:40 PM
  #33  
charlieaf92
Rennlist Member
 
charlieaf92's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: cincinnati
Posts: 929
Received 97 Likes on 52 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Luca P
Hello, I’ve got a question, please: I’m looking into buying a Carrera, preferably a C2, but all the cool colours and the nice options come with a front diff.
So I found this thread!

Would the C4 be very different from a C2 after removing the front transmission? And PSM would just operate on the back, correct?

Captain Obvious, did you solve the front end problems after a new wheel alignment, please?
The C4 has less front trunk space than a C2. PSM operates through the brakes - independent of the drive components - so removing the front diff shouldn't have any impact.
Old 11-09-2017, 01:15 PM
  #34  
5CHN3LL
Race Director
 
5CHN3LL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: SOcialist republic of CALifornia
Posts: 10,423
Received 213 Likes on 157 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by charlieaf92
The C4 has less front trunk space than a C2. PSM operates through the brakes - independent of the drive components - so removing the front diff shouldn't have any impact.
I find that PSM is much less intrusive now that the front wheels are completely undriven. Still works fine - but less frequently.
The following users liked this post:
imhighlander (12-01-2023)
Old 11-09-2017, 02:49 PM
  #35  
charlieaf92
Rennlist Member
 
charlieaf92's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: cincinnati
Posts: 929
Received 97 Likes on 52 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 5CHN3LL
I find that PSM is much less intrusive now that the front wheels are completely undriven. Still works fine - but less frequently.
Interesting. I guess that removing drive to the front wheels changes the dynamics of each wheels speed when traction to the rear is lost. My rudimentary understanding of PSM is that it essentially works by monitoring each wheels speed and applying braking independently to each wheel. One thing I'd be curious about is whether it takes into account the impact of braking one front wheel to force drive to the other. If thats the case I could see that removing the front diff would have some impact on its effectiveness. I honestly can't remember if PSM was available on C2 models - and if so I wonder if the software is different or the same.
Old 11-09-2017, 03:05 PM
  #36  
dkraige
Pro
 
dkraige's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 740
Received 46 Likes on 29 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by charlieaf92
Interesting. I guess that removing drive to the front wheels changes the dynamics of each wheels speed when traction to the rear is lost. My rudimentary understanding of PSM is that it essentially works by monitoring each wheels speed and applying braking independently to each wheel. One thing I'd be curious about is whether it takes into account the impact of braking one front wheel to force drive to the other. If thats the case I could see that removing the front diff would have some impact on its effectiveness. I honestly can't remember if PSM was available on C2 models - and if so I wonder if the software is different or the same.
PSM is available on C2. Can't confirm whether the program parameters are the same, but I'd expect they are. It's just using the brakes and reducing engine power to reconcile wheel speeds to driver inputs.

Last edited by dkraige; 11-09-2017 at 04:43 PM.
Old 11-09-2017, 04:37 PM
  #37  
5CHN3LL
Race Director
 
5CHN3LL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: SOcialist republic of CALifornia
Posts: 10,423
Received 213 Likes on 157 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by charlieaf92
Interesting. I guess that removing drive to the front wheels changes the dynamics of each wheels speed when traction to the rear is lost. My rudimentary understanding of PSM is that it essentially works by monitoring each wheels speed and applying braking independently to each wheel. One thing I'd be curious about is whether it takes into account the impact of braking one front wheel to force drive to the other. If thats the case I could see that removing the front diff would have some impact on its effectiveness. I honestly can't remember if PSM was available on C2 models - and if so I wonder if the software is different or the same.
In addition to differential braking, PSM also retards engine timing for some slip situations. However, I do not believe that PSM is "on" long enough to direct power to the other wheel (like active brake differential in other cars).
Old 10-28-2018, 11:47 AM
  #38  
Andrewck
Instructor
 
Andrewck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Denver
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Well I took the plunge yesterday and pulled the front differential, cardan shaft, and axles. With the use of an air impact wrench, the axle nuts came off in about 20 seconds and HIGHLY recommend anybody doing this conversion to find a shop with air tools.

At this point, the big hangup is removing the c-clip on the outer end of the stub axle. No matter what I do with pliers or screwdrivers, I cannot get it to lift off the groove and release the axle. Everybody is tired after a long day - back at it today.




The following 2 users liked this post by Andrewck:
gIzzE (05-12-2022), MrTickles (12-02-2020)
Old 10-28-2018, 12:00 PM
  #39  
Dennis C
Rocky Mountain High
Rennlist Member
 
Dennis C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Colorado
Posts: 17,420
Received 1,444 Likes on 900 Posts
Default

Looking forward to hearing your thoughts about the conversion when you take your C2S out for a drive.

Looks like your your assistant is hard at work.
Old 10-28-2018, 12:01 PM
  #40  
Luca P
2nd Gear
 
Luca P's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

How about getting two new CV joints and leaving the half shafts complete?
How much would they cost, non OEM? See if it’s worth to spend some money and save some frustration, me thinks.
Also because, smacking or heating them up you’ll probably damage them anyway.
Old 10-29-2018, 03:45 PM
  #41  
Capt. Obvious
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Capt. Obvious's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Gig Harbor, WA
Posts: 3,943
Received 1,471 Likes on 810 Posts
Default

That is an option, but it's an expensive route to take when taking apart the factory CVs is free and you are unlikely to damage anything if you do it correctly.
Old 10-30-2018, 02:51 AM
  #42  
Andrewck
Instructor
 
Andrewck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Denver
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Well I'm genuinely impressed with those of you who were able to expand the c-clip and just tap the race to remove it from the axle shaft. I spent 4 hours playing with it on Saturday, and another 3 on Sunday. No luck! Screwdrivers of all sizes, pliers, snap ring pliers - no matter what I did the clip wouldn't move inboard or stay expanded long enough for me to disassemble. I finally gave in to brute force, placing the axle in a vice, expanding one side of the clip and beating the living daylights out of the race with a hammer. With that kind of persuasion, the race started to move back and finally broke free. Elegant? Not in the least bit. Effective. It sure was.

With the race out, the stub axles were easy to clean up and reassemble. As others have said, it's amazing how compact the AWD system really is and it's an amazing piece of engineering. I ended up reinstalling all the braces underneath the car, and taking the additional step of removing the front differential mounting bolts and hardware associated with the system.

I cannot give an accurate review of the car in RWD, as I haven't really gotten on it yet. First impressions (just driving around town and on highway) are:
  1. I can feel the weight gone from the front. Steering still feels tight, but the car feels like it's floating more at highway speeds and through corners
  2. I feel the transmission more. Not sure if I need to re-tighten the transmission bolts, if the trans needs to settle now that it's not connected to anything upfront, or I'm just overly sensitive, but I'm much more aware of my shifts. Shifts feel slightly clunkier...hard to explain and I'm keeping an eye on it
  3. The car still grips like hell. Porsches are just amazing (and overengineered) machines. The car still feels so planted at moderate speeds and it's not unruly by any means (you C2 owners can attest to this). I intentionally lifted the throttle on an empty onramp and the rear end felt planted. Where the AWD car wouldn't change feel at all doing that, the RWD car has a slight "sway" to it. Not dangerous or unnerving, but you can feel the weight shift of the back end more. Running 295s in back, I think it's going to take a lot to really break the back end loose.
I'll report back after I drive the car for a month and can push it more. Happy so far as I'm looking for a more visceral feeling and to really connect with the car by stripping out as many driving aids as possible. With the conversion done, I'm one step closer to that goal!

Cheers,
Andrew

The following users liked this post:
MrTickles (12-02-2020)
Old 10-30-2018, 12:30 PM
  #43  
911Syncro
Pro
 
911Syncro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: San Pasqual Valley, CA
Posts: 525
Received 237 Likes on 106 Posts
Default

A reminder that removing the AWD may result in a slower car. The C4S was faster than any C2 in factory testing on the Nurburgring. See here on the bottom of page 81. https://rennlist.com/forums/996-foru...l#post14125769

With the 80 lbs removed, it should accelerate faster at slower speeds, and it may be faster in lower speed racing. The stability provided by the AWD, and I suppose extra drive traction, are probably what makes it faster at higher speeds. Or maybe it is the fatter tires or better brakes, who knows. Does anybody think they put AWD on every 996 Turbo for some reason other than to make it a faster / better car?
Old 10-30-2018, 02:02 PM
  #44  
strathconaman
Three Wheelin'
 
strathconaman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Toronto, north of the lake.
Posts: 1,565
Received 210 Likes on 134 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 911Syncro
A reminder that removing the AWD may result in a slower car. The C4S was faster than any C2 in factory testing on the Nurburgring. See here on the bottom of page 81. https://rennlist.com/forums/996-foru...l#post14125769

With the 80 lbs removed, it should accelerate faster at slower speeds, and it may be faster in lower speed racing. The stability provided by the AWD, and I suppose extra drive traction, are probably what makes it faster at higher speeds. Or maybe it is the fatter tires or better brakes, who knows. Does anybody think they put AWD on every 996 Turbo for some reason other than to make it a faster / better car?
I see your argument, and raise you the 996 GT2.
Old 10-30-2018, 07:49 PM
  #45  
911Syncro
Pro
 
911Syncro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: San Pasqual Valley, CA
Posts: 525
Received 237 Likes on 106 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by strathconaman
I see your argument, and raise you the 996 GT2.
The GT2 must be quite an experience, I don't think I could handle it. And the C4S is such an excellent car, and plenty for me.... after 1.5 years still loving it. I also should add that the AE is undoubtedly faster than the C4S.

I was out driving and thinking about this subject, and I also like the safety that the AWD adds. The viscous coupler (VC) is first class technology, when a wheel spins it transfers the power to the other wheels. So this car is safer whenever you are driving, and especially useful in poor road conditions (rain, snow, loose surface, etc). I think Porsches have always been made "rough and ready" and to me the AWD adds another dimension of utility and safety. Oddly I don't think I've ever heard of VC failure, or the failure rate is very low.


Quick Reply: How To: Convert your AWD 996 to RWD



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:06 PM.