Notices
996 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:

Max tire diameter, 996 NB?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-09-2013, 02:06 AM
  #16  
mklein9
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
mklein9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Palo Alto, CA USA
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Sneaky Pete
...I have 35's on the rear which are taller than 30's but the wider contact patch that the 35's (295) gave me sealed my choice. If PSS came in a 295/30 that would be the ticket.
Maybe a typo (as in the other thread about x74 first impressions)? PSS doesn't come in 295/35-18, confirmed both at the Michelin and Tire Rack sites.

But I think I'm leaning in your direction: 235/40-18 (25.4" diam), 285/35-18 (25.9" diam). Difference is 2% which should be OK. And tread wear from 10/32 to 2/32 is 0.5" in diameter (another 2%) so by the time the rears are at tread limit the diameter difference will be 0.25". New rears with half-worn fronts might be interesting though, with a 3% diam difference. Maybe by then there will be a 295/30-18.
Old 04-09-2013, 06:35 AM
  #17  
balefire
Pro
 
balefire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 604
Received 41 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

I think you will be fine with PSS at 235/40/18 and 285/35/18.
I am running 235/35/19 and 305/30/19 with no rubbing, on my non lowered 996 40th.
In fact, I've ordered 235/40/18 and 295/35/18 BFG Rivals
As 6ta1 suggested, the front tire diameter will be the limiting factor at full lock.
The rears can go very tall as my fitment suggests.
Old 04-09-2013, 11:42 AM
  #18  
6ta1
Instructor
 
6ta1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by balefire
I think you will be fine with PSS at 235/40/18 and 285/35/18.
I am running 235/35/19 and 305/30/19 with no rubbing, on my non lowered 996 40th.
In fact, I've ordered 235/40/18 and 295/35/18 BFG Rivals
As 6ta1 suggested, the front tire diameter will be the limiting factor at full lock.
The rears can go very tall as my fitment suggests.
balefire, I am interested in your feedback. Have you tried any other size for the rears? The 295/30 or 305/30 are quite larger (in diameter) than our 235/35 fronts and I have been wondering if that makes the PSM act too quickly (thinking the rears start to spin earlier than they really do since they are like 5% taller than stock)

I was thinking about going 275/30/19 for the rears which would solve the diameter issue as well as balance better the handling (I have not enough oversteer on the dry and too much on the wet)
Old 04-09-2013, 05:03 PM
  #19  
white out
Three Wheelin'
 
white out's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,392
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

I'm running wb offset wheel with 295/30, stock height (for now) and no rubbing.

At stock height, I wouldn't be concerned upping to a 35 series tire. You might get better mpg (.5mpg) with the slightly taller ratio.

Originally Posted by alpine003
It would depend on offset, camber, rolled fenders, if you're using coilovers, etc.

I'll be running 245 front and 295 rears on my NB starting next week.
+1
Old 04-09-2013, 05:05 PM
  #20  
white out
Three Wheelin'
 
white out's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,392
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Also, look around at different tire manufacturers. Michelin isn't the end all.
Old 04-09-2013, 09:14 PM
  #21  
mklein9
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
mklein9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Palo Alto, CA USA
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

I asked Tire Rack what they would recommend and the response is:


The super sport sizes we would suggest you use on the car would be 225/40-18 and 265/35-18. We cannot ensure larger sized tire pairings will work correctly and not rub.
Yow that's quite a different approach from what you all have recommended.

According to Tire Rack's web site, the diameter of these is 25.3" (rear), 25.1" (front).

275/35-18 are also available, diameter 25.6".

Again I'm not after the absolute maximum possible grip by pushing width. I'd rather get the PSSs in whatever size makes the most sense. I like the idea of keeping with the stock front sizes to prevent rub.
Old 04-09-2013, 09:49 PM
  #22  
Sneaky Pete
Rennlist Member
 
Sneaky Pete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Mooresville, IN (Life Long Cheesehead)
Posts: 5,815
Likes: 0
Received 54 Likes on 35 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mklein9
Maybe a typo (as in the other thread about x74 first impressions)? PSS doesn't come in 295/35-18, confirmed both at the Michelin and Tire Rack sites.

But I think I'm leaning in your direction: 235/40-18 (25.4" diam), 285/35-18 (25.9" diam). Difference is 2% which should be OK. And tread wear from 10/32 to 2/32 is 0.5" in diameter (another 2%) so by the time the rears are at tread limit the diameter difference will be 0.25". New rears with half-worn fronts might be interesting though, with a 3% diam difference. Maybe by then there will be a 295/30-18.
yupppp...typo. Go get them they are great.
Old 04-10-2013, 01:41 AM
  #23  
white out
Three Wheelin'
 
white out's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,392
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

265/35 is the winter tire size recommended by Porsche on both the nb & wb cars. It may look stretched on your wheel.

why not go with a different tire?
Old 04-10-2013, 05:41 AM
  #24  
balefire
Pro
 
balefire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 604
Received 41 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 6ta1
balefire, I am interested in your feedback. Have you tried any other size for the rears? The 295/30 or 305/30 are quite larger (in diameter) than our 235/35 fronts and I have been wondering if that makes the PSM act too quickly (thinking the rears start to spin earlier than they really do since they are like 5% taller than stock)

I was thinking about going 275/30/19 for the rears which would solve the diameter issue as well as balance better the handling (I have not enough oversteer on the dry and too much on the wet)
6ta1. I've tried 295/30/19, 305/30/19. I've never had issues with PSM, perhaps because I have a C2.
I would consider changing alignment (max out camber front, 0 toe front, decrease toe rear, decrease camber rear) to reduce understeer before changing tires.
I would consider increasing my front tire width before I decrease the rear tire to reduce understeer.
Old 04-10-2013, 08:55 AM
  #25  
perryinva
Burning Brakes
 
perryinva's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 1,138
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

With your lowered x74 and keeping your rims, as others have said, the fronts determine max. I went through the same quandry you are in now, and just decided to spend a little more, and go with the right sized PS2s, which were under $1400 installed at costco, with road hazard, m&b, and N2 fill. I also use 7.5 mm spacers all.aroind from FVD. Some people, like me, just prefer Michelin tires because of past experiences, and afew $100 extra is worth it. Almost a year on the PS2 s and zero regrets. Alignment is the key to good wear. In my case, at or less than 5k miles ayear, they will last a very long time. Fun level and handling/ride are far more important than wear to me. What kind of miles per year do you expext to run?
Old 04-10-2013, 10:27 AM
  #26  
KrazyK
Drifting
 
KrazyK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,217
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Some of the bigger Ive seen. There are some NB 996's running 315's.

Last edited by KrazyK; 04-27-2016 at 10:26 AM.
Old 04-10-2013, 10:50 AM
  #27  
alpine003
Banned
 
alpine003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 7,697
Likes: 0
Received 26 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by white out
265/35 is the winter tire size recommended by Porsche on both the nb & wb cars. It may look stretched on your wheel.

why not go with a different tire?
IIRC, 265 is the standard stock size that came on '99-01 models. Starting in '02, they started coming with the 285 width as standard.
Old 04-10-2013, 06:53 PM
  #28  
perryinva
Burning Brakes
 
perryinva's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 1,138
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

265 was standard on 17's, 285 was always with optional 18s, I thought for all years.
Old 04-10-2013, 11:45 PM
  #29  
alpine003
Banned
 
alpine003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 7,697
Likes: 0
Received 26 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by perryinva
265 was standard on 17's, 285 was always with optional 18s, I thought for all years.
Your thinking about the mk2 models. The mk1 models always came with 265 standard for both winter or summer setups. Look at mk1 manual or tirerack site.
Old 04-11-2013, 05:59 AM
  #30  
Sneaky Pete
Rennlist Member
 
Sneaky Pete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Mooresville, IN (Life Long Cheesehead)
Posts: 5,815
Likes: 0
Received 54 Likes on 35 Posts
Default

Great choice! This is the best tire I have had.


Quick Reply: Max tire diameter, 996 NB?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 09:34 PM.