Notices
996 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:

LN Eng retrofit post mortem

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-23-2011 | 11:07 PM
  #31  
Shark Attack's Avatar
Shark Attack
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 11,013
Likes: 66
From: Southern Utah
Default

Originally Posted by j beede
No wonder my wife thinks I am nuts for wanting a 996. Maybe I should consider a more reliable vehicle... like a Lotus Esprit or Lancia Scorpion

At least parts are available for Porsche... good thing.
Good choice, see ya!
Old 06-23-2011 | 11:50 PM
  #32  
rpm's S2's Avatar
rpm's S2
Drifting
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 2,632
Likes: 15
From: Apex, NC
Default

Originally Posted by j beede
Topaz and TRT,
You may be right... but I still want a 996.
...j
I think your time will be better spent looking for a 996 than hand-wringing about possible problems.

Every 911 series (with perhaps the exception of the 84-89) suffered from some form of potential engine nightmare, whether it was busted head studs, badly designed cam chain tensioners, exploding airboxes or that interesting 964 motor decision to not include a major gasket. Porsches have always been, and will always be, expensive to maintain and repair. Just because 996s have come down in price due to the 150,000 Porsche sold, they are going to be any different. In fact, simply because of the complex electronics of any modern performance car, they are probably going to be worse.

Deal with it, or go buy a Honda.
Old 06-23-2011 | 11:50 PM
  #33  
j beede's Avatar
j beede
Thread Starter
Racer
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 484
Likes: 3
From: NorCal
Default

Originally Posted by Flat6 Innovations
I carried out the majority of tests for LN on this and supplied the data to them. There was also no less than three bearing engineers involved with this. I have utilized the same hybrid bearing technology in EVERY ONE of my engines since the beginning of my engine program and have a 100% effectiveness rating with them.
Prior to the IMS retrofit being possible this same bearing technology was used in the IMS Updates for completely torn down engines that we reconstructed.

LN has the data that you desire, whether they feel that your request for it is worthy of release of is up to them.

Remember, Porsche Engineers designed this bearing and the associated issues. Do all the calculations and tests that you want, the results of the IMSR are speaking for themselves. Many of them have more than 40K miles, I put over 30K on the very first IMSR ever carried out in one year alone. That engine is still going strong.

Contact LN.
I assumed that "water cooled technical discussion area" implied that technical discussion (including requests for and review of data) was welcomed. I will take your advice and see if Charles is willing to assist me.




All times are GMT -3. The time now is 02:32 PM.