Am I The Only One?
10-30-2010, 09:10 PM
#1
Instructor
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Am I The Only One?
Am I the only one, really, who much prefers the elegant looks of the narrow regular body over the turbo or more ridiclous "turbo looks" boy racer gaping holes in the front bumper and out of proportion rear quarters with multiple slots like on the Russian submarine?
Am I alone in my sillyness??
Am I alone in my sillyness??
10-30-2010, 09:35 PM
#2
Rocky Mountain High
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
I think so, yes.
I think the C4S is the best looking of the bunch! It has the lower stance and wider hips of the turbo, but doesn't have the intakes on the sides and the spoiler on the back to break up the lines.
I think the C4S is the best looking of the bunch! It has the lower stance and wider hips of the turbo, but doesn't have the intakes on the sides and the spoiler on the back to break up the lines.
10-30-2010, 10:02 PM
#4
Rocky Mountain High
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Yes... I agree... they are both excellent!
10-30-2010, 10:16 PM
#6
Rennlist Member
I gotta say, I think I am with you. i was looking at a turbo the other day and I have to say i liked the smooth body of my areo much better. But I am still not totally desided.
Trending Topics
10-30-2010, 10:31 PM
#8
GT3 player par excellence
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
some like DD cups while others prefer C's.
nothing wrong with you. it's your car. love it then it's all good.
i love fat bottom girls.
nothing wrong with you. it's your car. love it then it's all good.
i love fat bottom girls.
10-31-2010, 12:42 AM
#11
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Yes
10-31-2010, 01:21 AM
#12
Instructor
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sooo, I am not alone after all...
The front is more offending on the wide body style then the rear by the way so all the guys adoring huge bottom might have some excuse IMO.
But the gaping holes in the front fender are maybe needed for cooling but they ruin clean, smooth and elegant front bumper of classic 911.
The front is more offending on the wide body style then the rear by the way so all the guys adoring huge bottom might have some excuse IMO.
But the gaping holes in the front fender are maybe needed for cooling but they ruin clean, smooth and elegant front bumper of classic 911.
10-31-2010, 02:15 AM
#13
The C4S is widely recognized as the best looking 996. (OKAY, I'm biased!)
The best ode to its beauty is Sigfus' pages on his car:
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/336559...d-reykjavik-is
Go take a look, and maybe it will make you a believer!
The best ode to its beauty is Sigfus' pages on his car:
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/336559...d-reykjavik-is
Go take a look, and maybe it will make you a believer!
10-31-2010, 02:25 AM
#14
Rocky Mountain High
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
The C4S is widely recognized as the best looking 996. (OKAY, I'm biased!)
The best ode to its beauty is Sigfus' pages on his car:
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/336559...d-reykjavik-is
Go take a look, and maybe it will make you a believer!
The best ode to its beauty is Sigfus' pages on his car:
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/336559...d-reykjavik-is
Go take a look, and maybe it will make you a believer!
I certainly don't consider the front bumper to be offensive...
10-31-2010, 10:42 AM
#15
Rennlist Member
Am I the only one, really, who much prefers the elegant looks of the narrow regular body over the turbo or more ridiclous "turbo looks" boy racer gaping holes in the front bumper and out of proportion rear quarters with multiple slots like on the Russian submarine?
Am I alone in my sillyness??
Am I alone in my sillyness??
Unfortunately you're not, and it never ceases to amaze me the level of insecurity with some Porsche owners. Why do you have to put down one version of the 911 just to justify your preferences?
FYI: All 911 variants appeal to me.