Notices
996 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:

3.4 vs 3.6 exhaust manifolds

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-12-2010, 03:25 PM
  #16  
Schwabische Auto
Instructor
 
Schwabische Auto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

A technical question, why is back pressure good at times? Simple logic would seem to indicate that a bigger free-er flowing pipe would be better. however I understand that is not always the case. Thus the limited increase or decrease in performance from many headers available?
Old 08-12-2010, 03:53 PM
  #17  
ohdavey6286
Pro
Thread Starter
 
ohdavey6286's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL
Posts: 604
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Having some backpressure allows for low end power. If there is great airflow, you will make good horsepower but higher up the rpm range. You will however lose the low end power used in daily driving. It all depends on what you want the car for.
Old 08-12-2010, 07:00 PM
  #18  
Jake Raby
Burning Brakes
 
Jake Raby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Cleveland GA USA
Posts: 779
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ohdavey6286
Jake: You always smash my unrealistic dreams with your technical jargon I just noticed where you live. I am from Savannah and my girlfriend lives in Buckhead. Maybe when I go up again I can make a visit by your shop?
Sure. Just give us a call or shoot an email to set up a time for a visit, we work by appointment.
Old 08-13-2010, 04:22 AM
  #19  
Schwabische Auto
Instructor
 
Schwabische Auto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ohdavey6286
Having some backpressure allows for low end power. If there is great airflow, you will make good horsepower but higher up the rpm range. You will however lose the low end power used in daily driving. It all depends on what you want the car for.
Thanks, but what is the reason that backpressure creates low end power?
Old 08-13-2010, 07:18 AM
  #20  
Pac996
Drifting
 
Pac996's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Aiea, HI
Posts: 2,919
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

This link says his way of looking at it.
http://www.uucmotorwerks.com/html_pr...torquemyth.htm

Here the man has a better knowledge of engines instead of talking
http://www.warnertechnology.com/Cars/backpressure.shtml

Then hushpower relates some real factors to the understanding of the total scheme.
http://www.hushpower.com/product/40/...in+Racing.html

Comparitively since bigger tubes give better flow at high rpms then big is good for high end while smaller is good for lower rpms since it keeps the evacuation of the combustion chamber up better at lower rpms. Tappered tubes going large to small give a good compromise.

There was an old write up by some performance engine makers about how some things just didn't figure right with experiments done but the numbers are there that smaller tubes give better torque. It was experimenting around doing a ton of engine mods dynoing all the way. You know, the type of shop that amazes with the way they change cams and cranks like changing radio stations.
Old 08-13-2010, 11:19 AM
  #21  
nick49
Drifting
 
nick49's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Out West
Posts: 2,006
Received 22 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Schwabische Auto
A technical question, why is back pressure good at times? Simple logic would seem to indicate that a bigger free-er flowing pipe would be better. however I understand that is not always the case. Thus the limited increase or decrease in performance from many headers available?
As the intake valve is opening to allow the intake charge to enter the combustion chamber, the exhaust valve is closing allowing spent gases to exit. The period of time that both valves are open is refered to as overlap. Wild, agressive cams have a lot of overlap, conservative cams, less. Anyway during the overlap period, with too little back pressure, part of the intake charge wants to follow the exiting exhaust charge and poor cylinder fill is the result.

The proper amount of back pressure will minimize this. Keep in mind, cams are made so that the intake starts before TDC while the piston is still pushing out exhaust gasses and the exhaust valve is still open after TDC during cylinder fill. The exhaust tubing is sized for uninhibited flow at maximum RPM. The ideal would be a pipe that changes size with RPMs that gives the perfect balance of flow, volume, and back pressure for all engine speeds. Many motorcycles have exotic exhaust systems that incorporate valves that modify the flow characterics and canisters that add volume increasing torque when needed.

Bottom line, bigger is only better at maximum rpm, and a little too big there will decrease velocity which is bad.
Old 08-15-2010, 12:54 AM
  #22  
Schwabische Auto
Instructor
 
Schwabische Auto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Thanks that makes sense.
Old 08-15-2010, 06:26 AM
  #23  
Ale-Superbike
Instructor
 
Ale-Superbike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

So you say if I put the collectors of 996 x 51 on 3.6 and the rest of the original exhaust lose hp?
Old 08-17-2010, 03:04 PM
  #24  
etwd
Instructor
 
etwd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

not quite...........more like gain HP, lose low-end torque.
Old 08-18-2010, 07:01 PM
  #25  
seanmcr6
Pro
 
seanmcr6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Fort McMurray, AB
Posts: 672
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

So slower launches, faster 60-100 times then?

I'm struggling with deciding if it's worth upgrading the exhaust system. All the manufacturer's claim 10- 20hp from installing complete systems (headers/cats/mufflers)..and their dyno graphs don't show much drop in low end torque (if any) ....so are they all just lying?

I like the fabspeed CAI...although expensive, it looks killer. much nicer than the stock 996 box. Having said that..the 997 stock airbox looks miles better than the 996 one too. Dropping $600 on the intake cause it looks better is unjustifiable (to me) but doing so and getting 10 more HP and a better sound....that's a completely sensible upgrade.

My 04 C4S is 7 years old now and I'd like to give her a boost. I'm not looking for huge HP gains...but 10% gain should be reasonable...even for the 911 no?
Old 08-19-2010, 07:32 AM
  #26  
Ale-Superbike
Instructor
 
Ale-Superbike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Hello I will board the airbox of the 997 and 'filter sports. In fact if you are interested in selling a airbox of the 997.
The following users liked this post:
158Sierra (02-01-2022)
Old 08-19-2010, 09:22 AM
  #27  
Jake Raby
Burning Brakes
 
Jake Raby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Cleveland GA USA
Posts: 779
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Most people don't consider the fact that optimizing exhaust has little to do with "pressures" and more with sound waves and pulses.
The following users liked this post:
cercole (02-02-2022)
Old 08-19-2010, 12:43 PM
  #28  
seanmcr6
Pro
 
seanmcr6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Fort McMurray, AB
Posts: 672
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Fair enough Jake, however, I get that.

Unfortunately, I'm assuming THAT is exactly what these exhaust companies are doing when they develop an aftermarket exhaust. So basically, you're saying there is no real R&D gone into these systems, they've just taken a 20yr old premise that larger diameter is better and banged out some systems? Rather depressing thought, but completely plausible.

Is there any system you would recommend?
Old 01-31-2022, 12:49 AM
  #29  
Izzymends
3rd Gear
 
Izzymends's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Paul 996
Yes, the 996 3.6 is better than the 996 3.4 but only a little.

If you are staying with OEM then the one to have is the 997 3.8 X51 imho.
​​​​​​
SO, TO BE SURE, DO THE STOCK HEADERS FROM A C2S 997 3.8 FIT MY 3.4 996?
Old 02-01-2022, 08:15 PM
  #30  
158Sierra
Advanced
 
158Sierra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Signal Mtn, TN
Posts: 69
Received 36 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

See post 37. They will fit, but you will probably lose overall performance.


Quick Reply: 3.4 vs 3.6 exhaust manifolds



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 01:47 AM.