Notices
996 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:

Is IMS risk on a '99 996 enough to pass on it?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-23-2010, 06:03 PM
  #61  
ivangene
Parts Specialist
Rennlist Member
 
ivangene's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 16,326
Likes: 0
Received 24 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

low cost = more work and worries
higher cost (should) = less of both

IMO these garage queens are great, but if you plan on using the car you are gonna be really upset what it looks like in a year or 2 of road rash on the nose

ya cant have both perfect and a driver......
Old 04-23-2010, 06:03 PM
  #62  
JF914
AutoX
Thread Starter
 
JF914's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Pac996
You can always buy an italian red car and change the timing chain all the time according to service intervals. Or be swapping out bushings.
BEEN THERE....DONE THAT. WHICH IS WHY I AM SO NERVOUS ABOUT THE IMS.
(79 FERRARI 308 gt4, 89 FERRARI MONDIAL T CAB, 87 FERRARI TESTAROSSA)

John
Old 04-23-2010, 06:35 PM
  #63  
2K7TTMIA
Drifting
 
2K7TTMIA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,005
Received 21 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Cefalu
1999's are cable throttle and cable hood and trunk. The dead battery entry problems are not an issue. 2000 went to e-gas and hood/trunk solenoids, no cables. However, 1999 S4's are e-gas, no cable. '99's are the lightest.
I beg to differ on the cable hood/trunk.. my MY 00 was built in 06/00 and has the cable hood/trunk. I'm not sure on the e-gas, I'd have to double check.
Old 04-23-2010, 06:41 PM
  #64  
Mfletch
Three Wheelin'
 
Mfletch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Horseshoe Bend, Idaho
Posts: 1,701
Received 35 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

I just received this month's issue of Excellence Magazine and it has a lengthy article on the 996 IMS issue. It is part one of a series of articles on the IMS issue. The next part will deal with how to prevent it from becoming a problem. Great reading for current or future 996 owners.
Old 04-23-2010, 07:17 PM
  #65  
Cefalu
Racer
 
Cefalu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: SF Bay Area, CA
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dallasboats
sold my 99 and looking for only 99 to 00. they are lighter, more responsive, and cable throttle. imo, the way to go. if you are worried about maintenance, all 911's have had minor issues. this one is no different, nothing is for sure, if it scares you, walk away. you can either stomach the care or you can't afford it. imo, this is one of the most undervalued, high performance, low maintenance vehicles available. at these prices, write a check and forget about it.
Originally Posted by 2000996MIA
I beg to differ on the cable hood/trunk.. my MY 00 was built in 06/00 and has the cable hood/trunk. I'm not sure on the e-gas, I'd have to double check.
I have not inspected a MY 2000 myself, but according to the parts manuals they are motronic 7 which is e-gas. I had read (I think it was Streathers book), that when the accel cable was deleted they also got rid of the hood/trunk cables too. Sounds like that is not the case on yours though. I think I remember my MY 2000 Boxster S being electric hood/trunk too. But being a 6/00 you had a late one, almost a MY 01, not really a 99/00 transition car.
Old 04-23-2010, 08:09 PM
  #66  
Barn996
Race Director
 
Barn996's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Kittery, Maine
Posts: 11,801
Received 14 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mfletch
I just received this month's issue of Excellence Magazine and it has a lengthy article on the 996 IMS issue. It is part one of a series of articles on the IMS issue. The next part will deal with how to prevent it from becoming a problem. Great reading for current or future 996 owners.
That's just not right Mark....I haven't rec'd mine yet and I'm on the 'right' coast!!
Old 04-23-2010, 08:55 PM
  #67  
JF914
AutoX
Thread Starter
 
JF914's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mfletch
I just received this month's issue of Excellence Magazine and it has a lengthy article on the 996 IMS issue. It is part one of a series of articles on the IMS issue. The next part will deal with how to prevent it from becoming a problem. Great reading for current or future 996 owners.
Can MFletch or anyone else post the contents of the article....my local Barnes and Noble only has May 2010....the one we want is June 2010.

Very interested in what they have to say
Old 04-24-2010, 04:54 AM
  #68  
dallasboats
Pro
 
dallasboats's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Dallas
Posts: 677
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

anybody bargain shopping craigslist for a porsche is a moron......
Old 04-24-2010, 12:09 PM
  #69  
ROK
Banned
 
ROK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I'd never buy a '99. Save a little more and get an MK2 996.
Old 04-24-2010, 12:53 PM
  #70  
Graufuchs
Rennlist Member
 
Graufuchs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: LI NY
Posts: 3,353
Received 1,307 Likes on 486 Posts
Default

I have a MY00 with E-gas and cable trunk and hood releases.
Old 04-26-2010, 01:33 AM
  #71  
liondog
1st Gear
 
liondog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

After having a potential buyer choose to pass on the 996 I have for sale because of the IMS issue, I thought I'd do a little research. Sure enough, a discussion about my car! Thanks John for the nice words on the condition of my car. It is listed on ebay and in autotrader (links below). And to the comment someone made that it may not be worth $29K to them.....could not agree with you more....that is asking price ;-)

I'm checking the mailbox daily for the next issue of Excellence to see what they say on the IMS....until I put this up for sale, I just had not given the IMS issue much thought since I bought the thing. It's been an absolute joy to own!

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Porsc...fCarsQ5fTrucks

http://www.autotrader.com/fyc/vdp.js...standard=false
Old 04-26-2010, 02:14 PM
  #72  
rpm's S2
Drifting
 
rpm's S2's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Apex, NC
Posts: 2,632
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Porsche ownership has never been without risk. And yet I have seen this very conversation play out many times on this discussion board.

"I'm worried about (fill in the blank)."
"Can you guarantee (fill in the blank) won't happen to me?"
"How can they charge that much to fix (fill in the blank)?"
"How can such an expensive car (fill in the blank)?"

Simple answer - These are not Hondas, or even BMWs. Porsches, like all real performance cars, are built to tight and exacting tolerances that leave little room for error in order to achieve their most important goal: Going really fast, really well. And to be honest, Porsche has a long history of not getting every part exactly right in pursuit of this goal.

The history of expensive repairs to any one of dozens of Porsche models is far too lengthy to post. And if you factor in inflation, the damage caused by an exploding airbox in a '76 911, or a bad pinion bearing in a 968, was easily more than an RMS repair. Talk to guys who bought '90 or '91 964s and had the engine leak all over the place because Porsche figured the car did not need certain gaskets. This is not a hobby for the faint of heart, or the light of wallet. And, just because a car has depreciated significantly does not make it inexpensive - either to buy or to maintain (just ask 944 owners!).

With the concerns you had, you probably made the right decision. I had the same information, and bought my beautiful and very fast car... my 4th Porsche. It was neither a rational nor economical choice.

Eyes wide open and checkbook ready as needed.
Old 04-26-2010, 02:35 PM
  #73  
BruceP
Drifting
 
BruceP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,508
Likes: 0
Received 24 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

I'm with Ralph. With the 996, Porsches went from having a lot of expensive repairs that were inevitable, to one really expensive repair that was merely possible. On the whole, it's a better deal.
Old 04-26-2010, 02:43 PM
  #74  
Sneaky Pete
Nordschleife Master
 
Sneaky Pete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Mooresville, IN (Life Long Cheesehead)
Posts: 5,815
Likes: 0
Received 55 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BruceP
I'm with Ralph. With the 996, Porsches went from having a lot of expensive repairs that were inevitable, to one really expensive repair that was merely possible. On the whole, it's a better deal.
Me too!
Old 04-26-2010, 03:13 PM
  #75  
Torontoworker
Drifting
 
Torontoworker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: West of Mosport!
Posts: 3,372
Received 59 Likes on 26 Posts
Default

I don't care what anyone says - I'm happy I bought one - can afford to fix it if the worst happens - life is too short, I just had a relative pass away Friday, three weeks after getting the bad news from her doctor. We have no "do over's". Buy it - drive it - do not wait.


Quick Reply: Is IMS risk on a '99 996 enough to pass on it?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:58 PM.