Notices
996 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:

Redline vs. Swepco

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-15-2011 | 10:15 PM
  #16  
knfeparty's Avatar
knfeparty
Race Car
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,220
Likes: 35
From: Jacksonville, FL Duval County
Default

i have swepco, i believe 201, and it shifts badly when cold but very smoothly when warm, over factory which was just somewhat stiff all the time.
Old 03-17-2011 | 12:34 AM
  #17  
Tbred911's Avatar
Tbred911
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,661
Likes: 6
From: Toronto, Canada
Default

Originally Posted by ivangene
WRONG !!

Swepco 210 (not 201) for water cooled with a splash of 714 ATF

Just had this conversation at the shop this morning

Swepco 210 is VERY thick... you will be losing horsepower if you use that fluid because of the internal drag... if you are doing endurance racing then its ok because the heat will make it thinner...

why does your shop not recommend 201 for the 996?
Old 03-17-2011 | 01:15 AM
  #18  
altonj's Avatar
altonj
Pro
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 685
Likes: 5
From: West Coast Canada
Default

Swepco is an interesting choice.... curious why you would use a mix of this and ATF when there are good synthetic alternatives available...... Who is your wrench??

Cheers
Old 03-17-2011 | 07:05 PM
  #19  
Barn996's Avatar
Barn996
Race Director
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 11,801
Likes: 14
From: Kittery, Maine
Default

I bought Swepco tranny fluid for my '99 996 last year and purchased what they recommended for my Porsche. Although it did not eliminate my cold weather shifting difficulty, it did make it a bit better.



Quick Reply: Redline vs. Swepco



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 08:47 PM.