Notices
996 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:

Catalytic Converter

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 17, 2010 | 10:44 AM
  #1  
Airrik's Avatar
Airrik
Thread Starter
Racer
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 272
Likes: 1
From: St. Petersburg Florida
Default Catalytic Converter

Have any of you guys out there removed just the Cats off alone without changing anything else the 996 Carrera, if so how was your performance and did it make a noticable difference?

The next question I need to know did it throw off any codes or check engine lights in the ECU system. By the way I have 2001 Tiptronic not stickshift.
I appreciate any input regarding this matter.
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2010 | 11:05 AM
  #2  
ivangene's Avatar
ivangene
Parts Specialist
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 16,326
Likes: 29
Default

guessing

some have removed them for track use

betting:

it throws a code 100%
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2010 | 11:56 AM
  #3  
okbarnett's Avatar
okbarnett
Drifting
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,344
Likes: 49
From: tampa
Default

you have 2 O2 sensors on each cat. they compare O2 in against O2 out of the cat. the difference is processed by the computer. And generates fault code if necessary. You can buy a set of hi flow cats and that will allow you to use the car normally w/out screwing it up
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2010 | 06:48 PM
  #4  
4Scargo's Avatar
4Scargo
Drifting
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,152
Likes: 98
From: St. Paul MN
Default

They (you THEY) say that 02 extenders will negate the check engine light. If you screw in the 02 extender (into the "bung") and then screw in the sensor, supposedly you don't get a CEL. The "in" sensor should be okay, the "out" on the far side of the cat is the one you want to defeat. Of course you know this is illegal for anything but "off road" use. But, if you're going for noise and weight reduction, give it a try. I think the extenders are like $6 ea. and the "L" shaped ones are recommended.




Let us know if you try it.
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2010 | 07:09 PM
  #5  
russo's Avatar
russo
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,375
Likes: 2
From: Brownsville, Tx
Default

Removing the CATs for extra performance with surely disappoint you. In addition, the exhaust note will be quite loud.
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2010 | 11:03 PM
  #6  
67FJ45's Avatar
67FJ45
Pro
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 508
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
Default

The pre-cat O2 sensor is used for engine control and must be installed for the engine to run properly. The post-cat sensor is used to measure the scrubbing efficiency of the cat. You must have the pre-cat sensor.
Cat bypass pipes (just straight pipes that replace the cats) are available with a bung for each O2 sensor. When the ECU detects that the second sensor's response is consistent with poor cat efficiency, it will "throw a code" (check engine light will come on), but it shouldn't damage your engine. There are also ways to mimic an efficient cat, one of which was pointed out in post #4.
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2010 | 03:26 PM
  #7  
Macster's Avatar
Macster
Race Director
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 19,031
Likes: 266
From: Bentonville, AR
Default

Originally Posted by 67FJ45
The pre-cat O2 sensor is used for engine control and must be installed for the engine to run properly. The post-cat sensor is used to measure the scrubbing efficiency of the cat. You must have the pre-cat sensor.
Cat bypass pipes (just straight pipes that replace the cats) are available with a bung for each O2 sensor. When the ECU detects that the second sensor's response is consistent with poor cat efficiency, it will "throw a code" (check engine light will come on), but it shouldn't damage your engine. There are also ways to mimic an efficient cat, one of which was pointed out in post #4.
The engine controller will attempt to adjust the fuel/air mixture to see if this brings the output of the converters into acceptable readings.

Running one of these engines with non-factory and hacked up O2 sensor connections is not a good idea. While doing so may not damage the engine the engine's air/fuel mixture may not be as ideal as it would be otherwise. This could lead the engine to run closer to detonation than it would otherwise, or produce less HP than it would otherwise.

Sincerely,

Macster.
Reply




All times are GMT -3. The time now is 11:13 AM.