Notices
996 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:

IMS Failure on my '04 C4S - with a silver lining in my black cloud

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-22-2009 | 12:23 PM
  #31  
gota911's Avatar
gota911
Newbies Hospitality Director
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 18,084
Likes: 34
From: Winston-Salem, NC
Default

Great story and great support from your dealer!
Old 11-25-2009 | 08:29 PM
  #32  
jferrer1's Avatar
jferrer1
AutoX
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Default

" I was talking to one of our top local Porsche mechanics the other day about extending my warranty... In the discussion he said the 2004 C4S was the most common car he's seen with IMS failures. Didn't know why. " Interesting comment on the 04 C4S....sounds pretty fishy. Consumer Report Use Car Guide reports the 04 996 as having the best reliability record of the 996 production line. We should ask if track days increase engine failures. Why would a 996 04 C4S be more prone to engine IMS/engine failure. The 03 enhancements to the 3.6 cams, pistons, variocam etc should make it more "reliable" not less per your mechanics "observations". No one wants to be replacing engines to the tune of 15 K if out of warranty. Is there anything one can do besides change the oil at 5K (5W-40), not track the engine, run the car regularly, not lug the engine , shift properly, etc to avoid the dreaded replacement engine. And of couse the briliant statement "run it like you stole it" all the way to the dealer for your engine swap.
Old 11-25-2009 | 08:40 PM
  #33  
Mabuhay's Avatar
Mabuhay
Racer
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
From: Timbukto
Default

Originally Posted by racerman911
Friday a week ago I suffered the dreaded IMS failure on my 40K mile vehicle. ....Long story now short – I have an X51 engine on order.... total cost to me ... around $5K. ...Sometimes dark clouds do have silver linings!
Time for you to buy a lottery ticket...
Old 11-26-2009 | 12:36 PM
  #34  
racerman911's Avatar
racerman911
Thread Starter
Track Day
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
From: Western PA
Default

I certainly track my vehicle. Not sure why that should make such a difference between years (but may make a difference between models - the air-cooled model's IMS seem to be very reliable by comparison...)

My perspecitve is that these engines have been designed to be run hard. With the # of water-cooled porsches running at the PCA events I attend it strikes me as a bit more of "bad luck" with a known failure than specfic causality.

Replace "Porsche" with almost any other manufacturer - like Chevy (for Corvette.) In 2008 we had 2 corvette engines (both current models) disintegrate on-track in 1 weekend. Both were driven by very experienced drives. One was right on the pit staight @ Mid-Ohio. Very exciting - fireball-type fireworks & parts being shot everywhere. We went out to collect parts for 15 minutes. Can you imagine the discussion with GM in getting warranty coverage on this "event"?
Old 11-26-2009 | 07:23 PM
  #35  
99C2's Avatar
99C2
Instructor
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
From: Cary, IL
Default

IMS Failure:

When mine goes out I will have it towed to Sewickley!

99C2
Old 11-26-2009 | 11:11 PM
  #36  
BruceP's Avatar
BruceP
Drifting
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,508
Likes: 24
Default

Originally Posted by racerman911
the air-cooled model's IMS seem to be very reliable by comparison...
I didn't think the air cooled engines used an intermediate shaft?
Old 11-26-2009 | 11:30 PM
  #37  
JM993's Avatar
JM993
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,361
Likes: 5
From: SF Bay Area
Default

Originally Posted by BruceP
I didn't think the air cooled engines used an intermediate shaft?
They do.
Old 11-27-2009 | 12:06 AM
  #38  
BruceP's Avatar
BruceP
Drifting
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,508
Likes: 24
Default

Originally Posted by jmarch
They do.
As I comb through my poor old brain, it occurs to met that the difference with the M96 is not that it has an intermediate shaft, but that the shaft is unsupported at one end (and much longer).
Old 11-27-2009 | 11:53 AM
  #39  
Jake Raby's Avatar
Jake Raby
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 779
Likes: 4
From: Cleveland GA USA
Default

Basically the aircooled 911 has the same shaft to drive the valve train as the M96, but we refer to it as a "lay shaft" most of the time.. The 547 4 cam Carrera engine also used the same style of layshaft but equipped it with bevel gears to drive the exhaust cams.

Here is a pic of a layshaft from a Carrera engine from my 4 cam archive


The biggest difference lies in the fact that all the predecessors of the M96 use a plain bearing to support the layshaft (IMS) instead of a roller bearing, like the M96.
Old 11-27-2009 | 01:17 PM
  #40  
BruceP's Avatar
BruceP
Drifting
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,508
Likes: 24
Default

Jake, I think saying the "same shaft" is oversimplifying it. People would be misled to believe that Porsche used to make good intermediate shafts and then made bad ones. They made a fundamental design change, it seems to me, from a short intermediate shaft supported by bearings at both ends, to a long intermediate shaft that floated at one end. That's what strikes me as the biggest difference. And, frankly, it was understanding that difference that sold me on your product.

(Images poached from Renntech)

Last edited by BruceP; 03-03-2010 at 04:37 PM.
Old 11-27-2009 | 03:11 PM
  #41  
JDSStudios's Avatar
JDSStudios
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,093
Likes: 6
From: Mississauga, Canada
Default

Originally Posted by BruceP
Jake, I think saying the "same shaft" is oversimplifying it. People would be misled to believe that Porsche used to make good intermediate shafts and then made bad ones. They made a fundamental design change, it seems to me, from a short intermediate shaft supported by bearings at both ends, to a long intermediate shaft that floated at one end. That's what strikes me as the biggest difference. And, frankly, it was understanding that difference that sold me on your product.

(Images poached from Renntech)
what is #28 ?
Old 11-27-2009 | 04:16 PM
  #42  
rotokim's Avatar
rotokim
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,113
Likes: 6
From: Apex, NC
Default

What a great story. If my 996 ever experiences this much-discussed situation, I plan to make the same conversion to the X51.
Old 11-28-2009 | 09:44 PM
  #43  
jferrer1's Avatar
jferrer1
AutoX
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Default

"I certainly track my vehicle. Not sure why that should make such a difference between years (but may make a difference between models - the air-cooled model's IMS seem to be very reliable by comparison.". The 03-04 996 models got new crankshafts, new pistons and new connecting rod's. Not sure if any of these would decrease the engine swap. Jake, if given the choice to choose a model year for the 996, which would you choose based on your experience?
Old 11-29-2009 | 06:39 AM
  #44  
JDSStudios's Avatar
JDSStudios
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,093
Likes: 6
From: Mississauga, Canada
Default

Just a guess: as far as IMS is concerned, all 996 and Boxters line up for failure statistics.
My 02 C4S is fine at 94 Km.
Old 11-29-2009 | 10:37 AM
  #45  
tgt40's Avatar
tgt40
Pro
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 636
Likes: 1
Default

Congrats on having a stupendous dealer! The one here seems good and while I sure don't want to test HOW good I'm happy to hear that your diligence and loyalty was rememebered and recognized!

What's the name of the Dealership again?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 05:00 PM.