RWD vs the all-wheel drive C4S?
#16
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Not that this matters for this discussion, but no need for further 964 rumors to spread!
#18
The nature of the viscous slip AWD means that there is a slight delay before power is transferred to the front. So it handles more or less like a RWD. It does not handle like the other AWD systems that sends even power to all 4 wheels at once. In the snow/ice the AWD helps, but the front can be a little more squirmy compared to FWD, especially changing lanes.
The steering on the AWD feels a little heavier because the front tires are being driven. The AWD feels a little more stable under power coming out of corners when conditions are slippery. A C4S is about 275 lbs. heavier than the C2.
For the Top Gear comparo:
http://coochas.com/porsche/Resources...Gear121105.mp4
The steering on the AWD feels a little heavier because the front tires are being driven. The AWD feels a little more stable under power coming out of corners when conditions are slippery. A C4S is about 275 lbs. heavier than the C2.
For the Top Gear comparo:
http://coochas.com/porsche/Resources...Gear121105.mp4
#19
Rennlist Member
The nature of the viscous slip AWD means that there is a slight delay before power is transferred to the front. So it handles more or less like a RWD. It does not handle like the other AWD systems that sends even power to all 4 wheels at once. In the snow/ice the AWD helps, but the front can be a little more squirmy compared to FWD, especially changing lanes.
The steering on the AWD feels a little heavier because the front tires are being driven. The AWD feels a little more stable under power coming out of corners when conditions are slippery. A C4S is about 275 lbs. heavier than the C2.
For the Top Gear comparo:
http://coochas.com/porsche/Resources...Gear121105.mp4
The steering on the AWD feels a little heavier because the front tires are being driven. The AWD feels a little more stable under power coming out of corners when conditions are slippery. A C4S is about 275 lbs. heavier than the C2.
For the Top Gear comparo:
http://coochas.com/porsche/Resources...Gear121105.mp4
#21
Pro
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: On the snow and Putnam County, NY
Posts: 720
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes
on
1 Post
My thought process a year ago was that I'm not going to take the car on the track that much and I live in the northeast. Even when I take it on the track, is it really "that" much slower than a C2? Most of the time it should be driving like a RWD with a bit of pull from the front (5%-95%). I really never get to the point where the viscous coupling will have transferred 30% to the front, which is supposedly at about 155 mph. The only time it exceeds 30% and gos up to almost 40% is when the rear weals are spinning.
So I couldn't go wrong with a C4S, plus I absolutely love the looks of a C4S!
So I couldn't go wrong with a C4S, plus I absolutely love the looks of a C4S!
#22
Ironman 140.6
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Some info here
http://www.awd.ee/viscous.html
996 vs 997 system
http://www.porsche.com/microsite/tec...PMT911TurboAll
#23
Pro
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: On the snow and Putnam County, NY
Posts: 720
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes
on
1 Post
Ray,
Thanks for the info. I was under the impression from the "Essential Companion" that it had a combination of both, slip would take it up to 40% and normal driving would take it up to 30% (at 155mph/250kph).
Thanks,
Eric
Thanks for the info. I was under the impression from the "Essential Companion" that it had a combination of both, slip would take it up to 40% and normal driving would take it up to 30% (at 155mph/250kph).
Thanks,
Eric
#24
Ironman 140.6
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
#26
Poseur
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
No, no... the 964 AWD system is not any more problematic than the rest of the systems - it was too expensive to manufacture at a time when Porsche was not doing well. It works extremely well, is extremely reliable, and doesn't require any further repairs over the cheaper viscous systems. It had the capability of sending 0-100% of the power to the front wheels almost instantaneously without a delay from a viscous clutch - the 964 version multi-clutch plate system is what the 997 turbos have gone back to using with a couple changes thanks to technology advances.
Not that this matters for this discussion, but no need for further 964 rumors to spread!
Not that this matters for this discussion, but no need for further 964 rumors to spread!
#27
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
While not an absolute, in the 6 years of being active on the Rennlist 964 forum, I know of just 3 owners that have done the conversion for various reasons, not due to problems. Joel Reiser's article in Panorama seemed to scare a lot of people... just like the internet does with 996 engine failures.
#28
#29
My thought process a year ago was that I'm not going to take the car on the track that much and I live in the northeast. Even when I take it on the track, is it really "that" much slower than a C2? Most of the time it should be driving like a RWD with a bit of pull from the front (5%-95%). I really never get to the point where the viscous coupling will have transferred 30% to the front, which is supposedly at about 155 mph. The only time it exceeds 30% and gos up to almost 40% is when the rear weals are spinning.
So I couldn't go wrong with a C4S, plus I absolutely love the looks of a C4S!
So I couldn't go wrong with a C4S, plus I absolutely love the looks of a C4S!
At the track, the C2 "would" be faster with the correct driver. With the average driver, the C4S will instill confidence much more than the C2 that the C4S will "seem" faster.
Also, we're not racing for medals on DE's. So it doesn't matter in the end. What matters is how much fun and education the owner experiences.
It's similar to people always saying PS2 is much better than, say, Conti SportContact 2 simply because it's stickier when it's the same people who can't even reach the PS2's limits, especially on the street.