Notices
996 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:

M96 Engine failure teardown this weekend

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-18-2009, 11:05 AM
  #46  
chsu74
Rennlist Member
 
chsu74's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: CT
Posts: 9,615
Received 313 Likes on 261 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by easyC
If anybody is interested in any of these parts... make me an offer...
That will buff right out?
Old 01-18-2009, 02:32 PM
  #47  
Jake Raby
Burning Brakes
 
Jake Raby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Cleveland GA USA
Posts: 779
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cdodkin
Interesting that it was cylinder 4.

It's more common to find one of the center cylinders cracking.

That's why I was asking if the head had cracked as well, as this is more common on the outer cylinders.

Did you have any signs of intermix or coolant loss before the engine eventually let go at the track?
We see D chunk failures with all cylinders.. In fact #1 seems to be the most failure related cylinder in the 996 while #4 is the most fail prone in the Boxster applications.

We have seen all cylinders fail from all models and years.
Old 01-18-2009, 06:05 PM
  #48  
cdodkin
Drifting
 
cdodkin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Another Ex pat Brit in SoCal
Posts: 2,442
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jake Raby
We see D chunk failures with all cylinders.. In fact #1 seems to be the most failure related cylinder in the 996 while #4 is the most fail prone in the Boxster applications.

We have seen all cylinders fail from all models and years.
So why the difference between the two cars do you think?
Old 01-18-2009, 06:32 PM
  #49  
Jake Raby
Burning Brakes
 
Jake Raby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Cleveland GA USA
Posts: 779
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Mainly due to the difference in oiling from the opposite G forces the engine oil encounters during cornering, accelerating and decelerating..

In a Boxster the engine is inverted when compared to a 996.
Old 01-18-2009, 09:33 PM
  #50  
Analog Theory
Burning Brakes
 
Analog Theory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,218
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cdodkin
your attempts at personal attacks are not welcome in this thread, or on this forum.

Give it a rest.
+1. This is a good thread, informative as well. Stop trying to manifest a confrontation where there isn't one. And for what it's worth, I've never seen or heard anyone in these forums or otherwise say "all M96 engine's are bad".
Old 01-18-2009, 09:50 PM
  #51  
cdodkin
Drifting
 
cdodkin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Another Ex pat Brit in SoCal
Posts: 2,442
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jake Raby
Mainly due to the difference in oiling from the opposite G forces the engine oil encounters during cornering, accelerating and decelerating..

In a Boxster the engine is inverted when compared to a 996.
Understood that the 986 has the block rotated 180 degrees horizontally, I have one of each - so the absolute physical position determines the most likely cylinder to fail in your scenarios?

Do you see the lack of lubrication under load as the main issue?

or is the cooling of the block inconsistent for similar reasons, leading to differential expansion and eventual stress fracturing?
Old 01-19-2009, 10:59 AM
  #52  
Ray S
Ironman 140.6
Rennlist Member
 
Ray S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 13,794
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cdodkin
your attempts at personal attacks are not welcome in this thread, or on this forum.

Give it a rest.
I guess I'll just consider the source. Good to know that you consider yourself the voice of the forum.....
Old 01-20-2009, 10:15 AM
  #53  
ivangene
Parts Specialist
Rennlist Member
 
ivangene's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 16,326
Likes: 0
Received 24 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

my question is:
from looking at the cams and the way the contact the valves, what is used to set the gap? I have "heard" these had hydrolic lifters but from the pictures I dont see anythng there.

Doens't have anything to do with the failure, just the motor in general
Old 01-20-2009, 10:35 AM
  #54  
LVDell
Nordschleife Master
 
LVDell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Tobacco Road, NC
Posts: 5,225
Likes: 0
Received 28 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cdodkin
How can you be doing a failed M96 block tear-down?

I've been reliably told, on this very forum, that that's statistically impossible/unlikely/irrelevant.....
Originally Posted by cdodkin
You see, that's where you get into hot water with Dell, Wellhard, and the engine Police - Define a lot?
Originally Posted by Ray S
I guess I'll just consider the source. Good to know that you consider yourself the voice of the forum.....
Originally Posted by LVDell
Not the engine police but the validity police. Something which you have no desire to learn and something you instead proliferate with hysteria and inaccuracy. And you wonder why so many people get bitch-slapped for asking questions like "Interested in a 996 but I have read here that these cars are prone to failure, what do I look for". People like you create the hysteria instead of trying to support the argument (either side) with facts. All I have done (and others) is try to get you to support your argument with fact instead of anecdote.

Not going to get into the same argument with you anymore. You know my stance, and I know yours. Enjoy.

Unsubscribe time

Ray, you need to just start to ignore this troll. See post #9 and #12 and that's all you need to know (they are quoted above in this post of mine. Not at any time did you, I, or anybody else come to this thread "attacking" cdod, but instead he chose to post not once, but twice with his usual diarrhea of mouth and instigation to try and pull us in so that he can have some forum to release his irrational unsubstantiated crap. I've decided to quit engaging such bottom feeders. See my last post to him (quoted above as well). Yet I still don't think he will get it. In predictable fashion though he won't be able to keep from posting some sort of irrational rebuttal to you and/or myself.
Old 01-20-2009, 12:23 PM
  #55  
Macster
Race Director
 
Macster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Centerton, AR
Posts: 19,034
Likes: 0
Received 253 Likes on 223 Posts
Default When I first read of the cylinder cracking failure it was stated...

Originally Posted by cdodkin
Understood that the 986 has the block rotated 180 degrees horizontally, I have one of each - so the absolute physical position determines the most likely cylinder to fail in your scenarios?

Do you see the lack of lubrication under load as the main issue?

or is the cooling of the block inconsistent for similar reasons, leading to differential expansion and eventual stress fracturing?
it was always a center cylinder. My thinking was the block was undergoing some stress/twisting and the crack happened at the weakest point.

Mr. Raby reports the failure is not limited to any cylinder but appears in all of them with no apparent pattern.

Thus this would appear that twisting of the block not to blame.

Several things come to mind: One is that the failing cylinder experiences improper combustion -- detonation or something close to it -- and the extreme pressure spikes cause a crack. I note the crack is always at the top of the cylinder. The open deck design doesn't help.

Another possibility is the cooling of the area that cracks is uneven. Perhaps low coolant or maybe coolant that has lost some of its ability to resist boiling causes an air pocket to periodically form. This allows this area to heat up and then when the pocket collapses the relatively cooler coolant heat shocks this area. If this happens, over and over again, at some point the wall fails.

The Boxster engine can suffer from oil starvation under some circumstances. One is under extreme braking in (IIRC) a left hand and high speed corner.

This forces oil under the right cylinder bank camshaft cover away from the scavenge pump located at rear of head under camshaft cover. A huge volume of oil is constantly fed to the cams and valve gear. It doesn't take much time for a considerable volume of oil (just several guarts is all it takes, maybe less if oil level a bit lower than optimum) to accumulate under the camshaft cover.

This can result in the oil level in sump going down to the point the oil pump may ingest oil with more air in it. If the oil "old" its anti-foaming additives may have been depleted too.

If the main bearings, or rod bearing don't suffer the hydraulic lifters might. With air in the oil these lifters will collapse though how this can result in engine failure I'm not sure. That is causes a drop off in power at higher rpms is a given as the valves no longer follow the desired valve action and lower lift, less duration, etc. work to reduce engine output.

If this air laden oil makes it ito any of the camshaft chain tensioners a tensioner could fail to maintain proper cam chain tension. This can be very serious cause the chain with more slack -- and at high speeds -- jump/skip a tooth and valve contact with piston can result with disasterous results.

Or the chain slams against tensioner that has lost its ability to maintain tension and breaks the tensioner/guide. Same bad result for engine.

Sincerely,

Macster.
Old 01-20-2009, 12:25 PM
  #56  
cdodkin
Drifting
 
cdodkin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Another Ex pat Brit in SoCal
Posts: 2,442
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Dell, please see post #44 from this thread - it applies to you specifically.
Old 01-20-2009, 12:32 PM
  #57  
cdodkin
Drifting
 
cdodkin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Another Ex pat Brit in SoCal
Posts: 2,442
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Macster
it was always a center cylinder. My thinking was the block was undergoing some stress/twisting and the crack happened at the weakest point.

Mr. Raby reports the failure is not limited to any cylinder but appears in all of them with no apparent pattern.

Thus this would appear that twisting of the block not to blame.

Several things come to mind: One is that the failing cylinder experiences improper combustion -- detonation or something close to it -- and the extreme pressure spikes cause a crack. I note the crack is always at the top of the cylinder. The open deck design doesn't help.

Another possibility is the cooling of the area that cracks is uneven. Perhaps low coolant or maybe coolant that has lost some of its ability to resist boiling causes an air pocket to periodically form. This allows this area to heat up and then when the pocket collapses the relatively cooler coolant heat shocks this area. If this happens, over and over again, at some point the wall fails.

The Boxster engine can suffer from oil starvation under some circumstances. One is under extreme braking in (IIRC) a left hand and high speed corner.

This forces oil under the right cylinder bank camshaft cover away from the scavenge pump located at rear of head under camshaft cover. A huge volume of oil is constantly fed to the cams and valve gear. It doesn't take much time for a considerable volume of oil (just several guarts is all it takes, maybe less if oil level a bit lower than optimum) to accumulate under the camshaft cover.

This can result in the oil level in sump going down to the point the oil pump may ingest oil with more air in it. If the oil "old" its anti-foaming additives may have been depleted too.

If the main bearings, or rod bearing don't suffer the hydraulic lifters might. With air in the oil these lifters will collapse though how this can result in engine failure I'm not sure. That is causes a drop off in power at higher rpms is a given as the valves no longer follow the desired valve action and lower lift, less duration, etc. work to reduce engine output.

If this air laden oil makes it ito any of the camshaft chain tensioners a tensioner could fail to maintain proper cam chain tension. This can be very serious cause the chain with more slack -- and at high speeds -- jump/skip a tooth and valve contact with piston can result with disasterous results.

Or the chain slams against tensioner that has lost its ability to maintain tension and breaks the tensioner/guide. Same bad result for engine.

Sincerely,

Macster.
Macster - interesting reading, and a very logical review of potential issues - How much of the damage we see is initial failure, and how much happens 'after' the initial failure, either by the engine continuing to run or attempts to start the engine after the event?

Is it even possible to tell after tear-down?
Old 01-20-2009, 12:42 PM
  #58  
rotokim
Burning Brakes
 
rotokim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Apex, NC
Posts: 1,113
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

I started reading this thread to learn whatever I can about the project, but I have to read yet another diatribe from cdodkin. Get a life and another car! I and a bunch of other people are here to learn about the engine project - not hear your endless jabs at other members who have a different opinion from yours. You took a great thread and pissed on in.
Bob
Old 01-20-2009, 12:58 PM
  #59  
LVDell
Nordschleife Master
 
LVDell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Tobacco Road, NC
Posts: 5,225
Likes: 0
Received 28 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Don't worry about his usual and predictable diatribes Bob. He continues to give strength to the kettle-pot theory. I take great pleasure now in watching him continue to talk to a wall as I will not address him anymore.
Old 01-20-2009, 01:07 PM
  #60  
Ray S
Ironman 140.6
Rennlist Member
 
Ray S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 13,794
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LVDell
Ray, you need to just start to ignore this troll. See post #9 and #12 and that's all you need to know (they are quoted above in this post of mine. Not at any time did you, I, or anybody else come to this thread "attacking" cdod, but instead he chose to post not once, but twice with his usual diarrhea of mouth and instigation to try and pull us in so that he can have some forum to release his irrational unsubstantiated crap.
You're right of course, but I don't really like being pushed around by an e-thug. Judd posts what could be (and hopefully still is) a good thread (informative rather than random speculation) that could illuminate causes of a failure only to have cdodkin lay an e-crap in post #9. I can certainly empathize with someone who has lost two motors, but it's sad to see blantent contempt injected into every topic on this subject.

Originally Posted by rotokim
I started reading this thread to learn whatever I can about the project, but I have to read yet another diatribe from cdodkin. Get a life and another car! I and a bunch of other people are here to learn about the engine project - not hear your endless jabs at other members who have a different opinion from yours. You took a great thread and pissed on in.
Bob
+1


Quick Reply: M96 Engine failure teardown this weekend



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:58 PM.