This should be interesting: porscheenginefailure.com
#1
Super Moderator
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Northern New Jersey
Posts: 16,142
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes
on
19 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
It will be interesting to see how Porsche responds, short of suing the guy for using "Porsche" in his website.
I'm sure nothing will come of this.
http://www.porscheenginefailure.com
I'm sure nothing will come of this.
http://www.porscheenginefailure.com
#2
Nordschleife Master
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The site itself is interesting. I agree. I don't think anything will come of it. But, then again, I happen to be one of those who believe this whole thing is blown out of proportion.
Wasn't there someone in this forum who wanted to start a class action lawsuit? Wonder what happened to it, and if this is the same guy?
Wasn't there someone in this forum who wanted to start a class action lawsuit? Wonder what happened to it, and if this is the same guy?
#3
Still plays with cars.
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
This should prove interesting indeed. There are a lot of horror stories about the 3.4 engine .... hard to tell if it is blown out of propoprtion or not. Still it is easy to claim that stories are exaggerated, unless you are one of the victims!
#5
Instructor
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
On the other hand, if somthing positive comes from Porsche, it will be meaningfull to all of us who have not yet had a problem and may in the future.
A little peace of mind perhaps.
A little peace of mind perhaps.
#6
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Porsche does offer an $8000 (although it may just have gone up) engine for an $80k car. That's probably about the same cost as an average engine in a $20k car. I think like most big companies, it's not in their best interest to admit fault.
Trending Topics
#8
Drifting
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Another Ex pat Brit in SoCal
Posts: 2,442
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
2 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
It will be interesting to see how Porsche responds, short of suing the guy for using "Porsche" in his website.
I'm sure nothing will come of this.
http://www.porscheenginefailure.com
I'm sure nothing will come of this.
http://www.porscheenginefailure.com
1) A cease and desist notice from Porsche - the last guy to do any form of customer poll had just such a nice chat with Porsche's legal folks
2) A cease and desist on the use of Porsche in the domain name - stupid rookie mistake - makes it way to easy for them to pull the plug on him.
Should of called it flatsixsucks.com or something less copyright!
![Big Grin](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
Last edited by cdodkin; 11-03-2008 at 10:43 PM.
#9
Rennlist Member
#10
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Anyone buying a porsche should know the engines can suck big time.
74 to 77 2.7's head stud issues
78 to 83 3.0's have chain tensioner and pop off valve issues
84 to 89 3.2's need top ends
90 to 91 3.6's suck doe to leaks
95 to 98's need top ends
96 to 98's have a hard time passing smog.
It is no suprise the 996 3.4 motors have issues too. Now if Porsche was smart about this they would do something similar to what BMW did for their faulty S54 motors found in M3's and Z3M cars. Provide a simple two year/100K mile warranty extension on the motor. Odds are a small percentage will break. Fix them quietly and move on. Two years from now a 99 996 will be 10 years old. Certainly out of the responsibility of Porsche.
Porsche needs to remember that the 996 has made Porsche many new customers not only on new cars but on resale too. Too keep the resale base up for the 997's Porsche needs to keep whole with the 996 owner base they have created.
If they don't Porsche will have a tough time selling new and used cars.
74 to 77 2.7's head stud issues
78 to 83 3.0's have chain tensioner and pop off valve issues
84 to 89 3.2's need top ends
90 to 91 3.6's suck doe to leaks
95 to 98's need top ends
96 to 98's have a hard time passing smog.
It is no suprise the 996 3.4 motors have issues too. Now if Porsche was smart about this they would do something similar to what BMW did for their faulty S54 motors found in M3's and Z3M cars. Provide a simple two year/100K mile warranty extension on the motor. Odds are a small percentage will break. Fix them quietly and move on. Two years from now a 99 996 will be 10 years old. Certainly out of the responsibility of Porsche.
Porsche needs to remember that the 996 has made Porsche many new customers not only on new cars but on resale too. Too keep the resale base up for the 997's Porsche needs to keep whole with the 996 owner base they have created.
If they don't Porsche will have a tough time selling new and used cars.
#11
Burning Brakes
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I don't think $12-14k is much subsidized; it just doesn't include the Porsche typical margin for the 911; so the $80k purchase price for the car is inflated by probably $30-40k. This brings the cost for the engine swap back in relation to the price/cost of the car (approx. 25%).
It's like selling a Camry for $60k - unfortunately for Toyota, the Camry is not an icon like the 911 and people don't want to pay a premium for a Toyota.
A similar example is Red Bull: it's more expensive than Coke due to production cost; the price difference is due to clever marketing.
It's like selling a Camry for $60k - unfortunately for Toyota, the Camry is not an icon like the 911 and people don't want to pay a premium for a Toyota.
A similar example is Red Bull: it's more expensive than Coke due to production cost; the price difference is due to clever marketing.
#12
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Interesting way to start his story by admitting he was driving home from a bar and speeding.......
So has he retained the law firm linked at the bottom of the page?
Interesting.........
So has he retained the law firm linked at the bottom of the page?
Interesting.........
#13
Race Car
#14
Technical Guru
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I suspect he'll get a couple of calls.
1) A cease and desist notice from Porsche - the last guy to do any form of customer poll had just such a nice chat with Porsche's legal folks
2) A cease and desist on the use of Porsche in the domain name - stupid rookie mistake - makes it way to easy for them to pull the plug on him.
Should of called it flatsixsucks.com or something less copyright!![Big Grin](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
1) A cease and desist notice from Porsche - the last guy to do any form of customer poll had just such a nice chat with Porsche's legal folks
2) A cease and desist on the use of Porsche in the domain name - stupid rookie mistake - makes it way to easy for them to pull the plug on him.
Should of called it flatsixsucks.com or something less copyright!
![Big Grin](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
#15
Nordschleife Master
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Porsche doesn't have a leg to stand on...