Notices
996 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:

Variocam engagement abrupt

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-24-2007, 05:07 PM
  #46  
rcg412
Rennlist Member
 
rcg412's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Back-Country Greenwich, CT
Posts: 1,815
Received 122 Likes on 81 Posts
Default

That service manual is awesome - thanks for posting!
Old 05-24-2007, 05:26 PM
  #47  
1999Porsche911
Race Car
 
1999Porsche911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 4,159
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JimB
Bill, If I'm not mistaken, what people are feeling at 3500 is the valve lift. The timing shift is somewhere between 5800 and 6200. It's what's happening when you see that big dip in your dyno chart.

The timing shift is also binary. If you power the switch, your cam chain tensioner is on one side, if you don't power its on the other.
What you are feeling "later" at about 5200 rpm on the NA engine is the length of the intake becoming longer. The resonance flap opens wide at 5200 rpm creating a turbulance in the air flow that creates the feeling of a kick.
Old 05-24-2007, 06:29 PM
  #48  
JimB
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
JimB's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: MN
Posts: 2,569
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by wrljet
The chain tensioner scheme is for the non-Plus version, no?
Aren't all 3.6Ls Plus? Maybe not. I know the 3.6L we put in my race car still used the tensioner. I know this because we had to modify the cam sensor ring and add an rpm switch to control the timing shift. Once we got it right it worked perfect but it was a pain.

1999, it is definitely the cam timing shift that causes the HP drop. If you look at the "before" dyno on the plenum thread you can see it happen. At least in my car the resonance flap didn't have much effect. We unplugged it and it had no impact on the dyno. Go figure.
Old 05-24-2007, 06:51 PM
  #49  
1999Porsche911
Race Car
 
1999Porsche911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 4,159
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JimB
Aren't all 3.6Ls Plus? Maybe not. I know the 3.6L we put in my race car still used the tensioner. I know this because we had to modify the cam sensor ring and add an rpm switch to control the timing shift. Once we got it right it worked perfect but it was a pain.

1999, it is definitely the cam timing shift that causes the HP drop. If you look at the "before" dyno on the plenum thread you can see it happen. At least in my car the resonance flap didn't have much effect. We unplugged it and it had no impact on the dyno. Go figure.
If it was operating correctly, the resonance flap sure will effect the dyno. Just plot your timing and you'll see where it changes.
Old 05-24-2007, 06:56 PM
  #50  
wrljet
Racer
 
wrljet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Bethesda, MD
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JimB
Aren't all 3.6Ls Plus? Maybe not. I know the 3.6L we put in my race car still used the tensioner. I know this because we had to modify the cam sensor ring and add an rpm switch to control the timing shift. Once we got it right it worked perfect but it was a pain.

1999, it is definitely the cam timing shift that causes the HP drop. If you look at the "before" dyno on the plenum thread you can see it happen. At least in my car the resonance flap didn't have much effect. We unplugged it and it had no impact on the dyno. Go figure.
As far as I understand it, yes, all 3.6s are Plus.

Check out the link I posted earlier. It shows the timing adjustment scheme is on the end of the sprockets. Not the sliding tensioners.

Bill
Old 05-24-2007, 10:42 PM
  #51  
JimB
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
JimB's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: MN
Posts: 2,569
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by wrljet
As far as I understand it, yes, all 3.6s are Plus.

Check out the link I posted earlier. It shows the timing adjustment scheme is on the end of the sprockets. Not the sliding tensioners.

Bill
I'm sure you're right. I must be confusing my engines.
Old 05-24-2007, 10:52 PM
  #52  
Ray S
Ironman 140.6
Rennlist Member
 
Ray S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 13,794
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

All 3.6's are VC plus...
Old 05-25-2007, 01:56 AM
  #53  
jasper
Three Wheelin'
 
jasper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: north vancouver
Posts: 1,418
Received 23 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rcg412
That service manual is awesome - thanks for posting!
+10!
Freakin sweet piece of literature to go with my 2002 Carrera. Where did you get this?
Old 05-25-2007, 09:12 AM
  #54  
wrljet
Racer
 
wrljet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Bethesda, MD
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jasper
+10!
Freakin sweet piece of literature to go with my 2002 Carrera. Where did you get this?
I don't remember. Possibly from the Porsche factory service website, Sweden.

Bill
Old 05-25-2007, 01:21 PM
  #55  
itorque
Instructor
 
itorque's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have stayed out of the oil debate but this thread shows a very important part of why I stay with the factory oil specifications. The Variocam plus system is HIGHLY dependent on oil temperature and viscosity.
Old 05-25-2007, 02:06 PM
  #56  
1999Porsche911
Race Car
 
1999Porsche911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 4,159
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by itorque
I have stayed out of the oil debate but this thread shows a very important part of why I stay with the factory oil specifications. The Variocam plus system is HIGHLY dependent on oil temperature and viscosity.

Every moving part of the engine is HIGHLY dependent on oil temperature and viscosity.
Old 05-27-2007, 03:53 AM
  #57  
10 GT3
Drifting
 
10 GT3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,206
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I've always noticed the Variocam kicking in between 2500 and 3000 rpms, but this is with an 02'. Keep in mind that the 99-01 cars have a much simpler system. They only have variable cam degree on the intake only. The 02+ have variable cam degree on the intake and exhaust, in addition variable lift (similar to Honda's VTEC system). Hence why the newer system is call "Variocam Plus". The operation of both systems is completely dependant on engine oil. Even a small deviation from the correct engine oil viscosity can easily cause problems with the engagement of this system.



Quick Reply: Variocam engagement abrupt



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 01:33 AM.