Notices
996 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:

M030 suspension or other options

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-15-2006, 04:24 PM
  #16  
LiveNupe
Rennlist Member
 
LiveNupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: DFW
Posts: 1,379
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Here's a related post from the POC GRC discussion board.....

Proposed: Allow 993 cars to use M030 (US) springs to remain in Stock Class
and allow M030 RoW springs to Improved Class

CC Decision: the CC is in unanimous agreement to allow Improved 993 cars to
have Factory Euro Springs that will lower the car, but would not change the
spring rate.
Old 09-15-2006, 08:51 PM
  #17  
10 GT3
Drifting
 
10 GT3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,206
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pjalexandre
The article and I must both be wrong then. It must be the +/- 10MM piece in the article for all US cars (Std and M030) at a ride height of 158 front and rear as per table 1.
Sorry, you may be correct the. I always thought the US sport suspension was exactly the same as the ROW std, but they show the front springs are taller with the same spring rates. This actually makes me look down on the US sport susension since this actually makes it inferior to what the Europeans get standard.



Quick Reply: M030 suspension or other options



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 07:20 PM.