Notices
996 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:

C2 vs S4 vs M3

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-23-2006, 12:31 PM
  #31  
Deven
Pro
 
Deven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 661
Received 199 Likes on 101 Posts
Default

You are correct, I just saw the GT3 and assumed it was the latest iteration. . Interesting that the newer GT3 gained 21 hp AND 30kg. That being said, I wonder how the X51with the extra 30hp will hold up against the GT3 .
Old 04-23-2006, 07:59 PM
  #32  
Tbred911
Three Wheelin'
 
Tbred911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,661
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

carrera s with x51 should be *very* close to MKII GT3 in terms of acceleration... the x-51 package should bring down the 0-200km/h time by 1.5 seconds putting it right with the MKII-GT3.
Old 04-23-2006, 08:18 PM
  #33  
LVDell
Nordschleife Master
 
LVDell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Tobacco Road, NC
Posts: 5,225
Likes: 0
Received 28 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

true but the accel isn't everything. If you intend to track GT3 is the car. If you want GT3 power for the street then the 997SX51 is the car.
Old 04-25-2006, 11:55 AM
  #34  
Tbred911
Three Wheelin'
 
Tbred911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,661
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

I agree... the 997SX51 is well suited for double duty.
Old 04-25-2006, 12:02 PM
  #35  
Tbred911
Three Wheelin'
 
Tbred911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,661
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 02 Carrera
One thing people don't realize about the "ring" times is what types of cars were actually tested. The 99' Carrera that ran the 8:17 was a coupe. The 02' that ran the same time, was a much heavier Euro Targa. Obviously a coupe with the sports suspension would have been faster.

The car in the dropdown listbox in the "comparison" section is *not* the targa but the lighter 02 3.6 coupe.

if you go to the "tracktest" on the LHS of the page you will see that a Targa was indeed tested and is still slower around the hockenheim than the 99 3.4

1:15.9 vs. 1:16.6

both the coupe and targa 3.6 have been tested... on *different* test dates... and for some reason the 3.4 beat them around the track... not by much though.
Old 04-25-2006, 07:41 PM
  #36  
Daniel@AdvancedMotorsport.com
Advanced
 
Daniel@AdvancedMotorsport.com's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

AMS has built alot of its business on modifying B5 S4's (we make alot of 450+HP S4's) and our time attack S4 is a monster (having the most wins in NASA Time Trials) but....

<start comment>The following comment is Daniel's comment, and in no way reflects AMS

C'MON! HOW CAN YOU COMPARE AN S4 to a PORSCHE?! ITS A PORSCHE!

</end comment>

unless ofcourse, your S4 is an RS4:

Old 04-25-2006, 09:02 PM
  #37  
42empress
Racer
 
42empress's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: connecticut
Posts: 388
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

nice audi



Quick Reply: C2 vs S4 vs M3



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 05:52 PM.