Notices
996 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:

C2 Suitability in Snow

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-18-2002, 04:27 AM
  #16  
Kostas Vassiliadis
Advanced
 
Kostas Vassiliadis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Athens, GREECE
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking

Dear wwest,

you said it yourself: what the porsche c4 has is a VC (viscous coupler) instead of a real third differential. the system is very much like the so-called "haldex" used in the small awd Audis (S3, TT). the REAL 4wd systems use three differentials (examples are all WRC cars, and the subarus/mitsubishi evos). the VC type awds are OK for general use but a pain in the *** for racing or track use. haven't you ever wondered why ALL recent racing porsches are C2s (GT3,GT2)?

regards

Kostas
Old 07-18-2002, 07:19 PM
  #17  
SpeedFreak01
4th Gear
 
SpeedFreak01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

[quote]The C4 is not the best as far as handling is concerned. It may be OK for normal driving or not so experienced drivers because its foolproof, but if you try to drive really fast on a twisty road or during trackdays it is not as efficient as the c2.<hr></blockquote>

I respectfully disagree. In my own experience, the '99-01 C2's understeer more than the C4's which are almost neutral. This has been confirmed by others I have talked to who have had the same experience. I have seen auto journalists express the same finding. Also, I am confused when you say the C2 is more efficient. Everyone knows an AWD car will be more efficient when putting down it's power. I can corner faster and power out of turns considerably sooner than on the C2's I have driven.

[quote]the VC type awds are OK for general use but a pain in the *** for racing or track use.<hr></blockquote>

I would agree that the VC on these cars is not a race AWD system as the one on the likes of the Skyline GT-R, but to say that it's "a pain in the *** for racing or track use" is a little extreme. There are many who track/race there C4's, including a few on this board who have great results. Anyway, just wanted to clear up these points a little.

Best
Old 07-18-2002, 08:27 PM
  #18  
GreggT
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
GreggT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 1,842
Received 48 Likes on 34 Posts
Post

Ditto to SpeedFreak01's comments.

I started tracking viscous clutch C4s in 95 and in short order was turning respectable times against any C2.....Today I love the Turbo on the track .....and as for the twisties not agreeing with the C4?....just spent a week of great fun driving a C4cab around Virginia Alleghanies...the car is as neutral & repsonsive as anyone could want (IMHO).
Final comment on the snow.....we love to drive in it...here in Wisconsin we get it (almost as much as Minnesotans )....the C4s & Turbos are as sure footed as any SUV with proper fitment & rubber (and the fitment & rubber are at least half if not 2/3s of the equation).....GreggT
Old 02-15-2006, 10:12 AM
  #19  
harris
Burning Brakes
 
harris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Atnens Greece
Posts: 1,025
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Kostas Vassiliadis
I think I would go for the C2 for the following reasons:

1. The C4 is not the best as far as handling is concerned. It may be OK for normal driving or not so experienced drivers because its foolproof, but if you try to drive really fast on a twisty road or during trackdays it is not as efficient as the c2. The porsche 4 wheel drive lacks a real central differential.
2. I drove a lot during the last winter with my c2 under heavy snow - with proper tire chains the car behaves excellent, I never felt I was missing the 4 wheel drive. Don't forget that will all that weight over the back wheels traction is very good.

Above comments are, of course, subjective.

regards



Kostas

Hi Kosta,

what tire size did you have at the rear (and front ) and what make of snow chains did you use?

harris - athens

996 Carrera 2 01
Old 02-15-2006, 10:22 AM
  #20  
LuisGT3
Rennlist Member
 
LuisGT3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 2,464
Received 28 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

Prabha,
I lived in Mn for 13 years before moving down here to FL. There is NO WAY a C2 can handle a Mn winter snow tires or not. The prices you have posted ($47k for a 99 and $59 for an 00) are waaaaaaaaaaaaay high. You may condsider doing what I did many times while living there. Find a car out of state. The way they salt the roads up there, you should consider a C4 change every 2 years.
Regards,
Luisjr.
Old 02-15-2006, 10:32 AM
  #21  
LuisGT3
Rennlist Member
 
LuisGT3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 2,464
Received 28 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

Here are some reasonably priced ones with Ok miles.
http://www.autotrader.com/fyc/vdp.js...en&cardist=934

http://www.autotrader.com/fyc/vdp.js...en&cardist=957

http://www.autotrader.com/fyc/vdp.js...en&cardist=892

http://www.autotrader.com/fyc/vdp.js...en&cardist=847

http://www.autotrader.com/fyc/vdp.js...=&cardist=1505

http://www.autotrader.com/fyc/vdp.js...s=&cardist=837

http://www.autotrader.com/fyc/vdp.js...s=&cardist=919

http://www.autotrader.com/fyc/vdp.js...=&cardist=1384

http://www.autotrader.com/fyc/vdp.js...e=&cardist=700

http://www.autotrader.com/fyc/vdp.js...e=&cardist=700

http://www.autotrader.com/fyc/vdp.js...=&cardist=1061

http://www.autotrader.com/fyc/vdp.js...e=&cardist=982

Good luck with your search.
Old 02-15-2006, 11:53 AM
  #22  
Ray S
Ironman 140.6
Rennlist Member
 
Ray S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 13,794
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

The C2 (w/snow tires) is great in the snow! I have driven mine in over 12" and it has performed brilliantly for me.

Good luck with your choice!
Old 05-22-2006, 05:44 PM
  #23  
dave w
Advanced
 
dave w's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: SoCal & Boston, MA
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

this post is 4 years old...hence the higher prices posted.

I always laugh when people say the awd is better in poor traction environments but not as good when the track is dry. Racing is all about staying on the edge of adhesion. That edge might be lower in the wet than dry, but an edge is an edge and a car that is better at one edge will be better at the other. if you say the c4s is faster in the rain but the c2 is faster in the dry its only because you are not getting to the edge in the dry and you need to drive faster

dw
Old 05-23-2006, 04:51 PM
  #24  
RJMDAD996
Burning Brakes
 
RJMDAD996's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Randolph, NJ
Posts: 807
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I drive my 996/03 in the snow without a problem (provided the height is not crazy) anything over 6-8" I will use the Rover - but 3-6" of snow the 996 with PSM handles GREAT ! with snow tires that is - I have yet to get stuck or have any close calls. I live on a mountain in northern NJ and we get snow bigtime. I think these cars are more capable than most think.
Old 05-25-2006, 03:01 PM
  #25  
mostserene1
Instructor
 
mostserene1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Old Town Alexandria, Virginia
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

agree. against all advice, I drive my c2 in all conditions, including snow (6" or less) using all season 18" pirelli P zero M&S tires and have not had a problem with traction. No ice storms yet. I would defintitely recommend snow tires if you have room to store them (I don't).

Biggest worry is someone else sliding into you (which is not affected by YOUR tires) and salt/ice melting treatment getting on undercarriage. Anyway, if it snows over 6" in Wash D.C. area they close the government and most businesses, so there is good opportunity to hone your drifting skills on the empty streets.....



Quick Reply: C2 Suitability in Snow



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 04:00 PM.