Notices
996 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:

Will They EVER Come Back?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-24-2004, 02:47 AM
  #31  
chris walrod
Guru
Lifetime Rennlist
Member


Rennlist Small
Business Sponsor

 
chris walrod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: yorba linda, ca
Posts: 15,744
Received 101 Likes on 52 Posts
Default

Originally posted by 996garage
chris walrod, maybe in hindsight they should have red flagged the race after Ralf's crash, but your point does not make any sense when you say:

"I am shocked they didnt do so as there were carbon toothpicks all down the front straight, maybe what caused the shunt a few minutes prior with the Renault.."

How could all the carbon toothpicks from Ralf's car crash cause Alonso's accident which occurred PRIOR to Ralf's crash??

I didnt say the debris from Ralph's shunt is what caused the Alonso's incident. Drivers were avoiding debris between pit-out and the braking zone before either of these incidents.

The delay in JPM's black flag was more than likely due to the time involved with the race stewards and team management reviewing and ruling. It would be a huge mistake to black flag and later say, 'just kidding'

Sorry this was OT
Old 06-24-2004, 11:03 AM
  #32  
matterhorn762
Instructor
 
matterhorn762's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Fort Bragg, North Carolina
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Back to the original subject of this thread... when was Porsche ever really in F1???? I think they provided an engine to a team for a year or two a long time ago, but when was Porsche ever a real F1 team?? I can't find them anywhere in F1 history....???
Old 06-24-2004, 11:14 AM
  #33  
bet
Drifting
 
bet's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Indiana
Posts: 2,190
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Supplying an engine qualifies as being in F1. BMW, Mercedes and Honda are definitely in F1, and they just supply the engines and Williams, McLaren and BAR, respectively, design and supply the chassis. Engine supplying in F1 is a huge commitment and constitutes as being part of a team IMHO.
Old 06-24-2004, 11:40 AM
  #34  
W.O.T. Freak
Advanced
 
W.O.T. Freak's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: São Paulo - Brazil
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It´s a lot of money, and maybe, they don´t get to be the winners. Ferrari with Shumi are a great deal of a Package, and very difficult to beat.

So why entry a race and spend so much money, knowing that you will be defeated?
Maybe, it´s better to wait a bit, for Ferrari to slow down, and show signs of weakness to entry it. And perhaps, that´s what Posche is doing.

W.O.T
Old 06-24-2004, 12:00 PM
  #35  
matterhorn762
Instructor
 
matterhorn762's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Fort Bragg, North Carolina
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Supplying an engine is much cheaper than the $500M tag people are throwing around (i.e. Ferrari). They won't have to pay the driver, get the sponsors, or any of that. Just built the engines... which they could probably do for under 100M, and that is conservative.

Even Lamborghini, a very tiny company was "in F1" for a few years just like Porsche was. It would be very easy for Porsche to build a V10 F1 engine. But I don't think that's what people are talking about here.

It's also quite silly to say they are waiting for Ferrari to "slow down." There will always be dominant teams in F1 and weaker teams. It would take many years of hard work for a new team to become dominant. You've got to start somewhere.

Porsche has never been a F1 team and probably never will be. Whether they put in a V10 engine or not I think is a relatively minor point. But if their marketing schemes - the oversaturation of Cayenne commecials for the daddy and his baby is any indication, Porsche is not very serious about any of it IMHO.
Old 06-24-2004, 12:23 PM
  #36  
bet
Drifting
 
bet's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Indiana
Posts: 2,190
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

I don’t disagree that Porsche could be an engine supplier for F1. The problem is with who and when? Porsche wouldn’t want to do it just to be involved with F1, they would want to be involved, competitive and have the ability to win. At this time there really isn’t a team in need of an engine supplier that is even remotely competitive, not to mention have the chance of winning and it is not because of the engine. The F1 package is so important and there are not many teams with the resources or ability to develop a competitive chassis. Additionally, with the future engine format undecided at this time, it makes no sense to spend the money on development of an F1 V10 when there is the possibility the engine format will be changed to a V8 in a couple of years.

I agree completely with the comment that Porsche is not serious about racing at this point. They seem content with supplying GT class cars in sports car racing, with an obsession with being the most profitable car company in the world and cashing in on the brand recognition that they developed with their past.
Old 06-24-2004, 02:08 PM
  #37  
chris walrod
Guru
Lifetime Rennlist
Member


Rennlist Small
Business Sponsor

 
chris walrod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: yorba linda, ca
Posts: 15,744
Received 101 Likes on 52 Posts
Default

With talk of the current F-1 engine formula being on its way out, anyone would stay away until the new formula is outlined.

It seems that Porsche is still trying to get back on its feet financially, recovering from what the mid 90's almost did to them as a company.

Porsche knows they would benefit more from a sports car program vs. F-1 engine only type of program. I am sure they still have a bad tasted in their mouth from the March/Porsche Indy car days.

At this point, I would be happy with factory sports car team, similar to the effort Audi put it with the R-8 (past years)
Old 06-24-2004, 02:55 PM
  #38  
matterhorn762
Instructor
 
matterhorn762's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Fort Bragg, North Carolina
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

So when exactly was Porsche in F1 and who did they race with?
Old 06-24-2004, 02:57 PM
  #39  
bet
Drifting
 
bet's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Indiana
Posts: 2,190
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

McLaren TAG Porsche - they won the the drivers championship in 84-86 with Lauda in 84 and Alain Prost in 85 and 86. They won the constructors championship in 84 and 85 (Williams Honda won in 86).

Here is a cool looking page but I can't get it to translate http://usuarios.lycos.es/cporschecat...ag/tag_cat.htm
Old 06-24-2004, 03:04 PM
  #40  
4ng crcs
Racer
 
4ng crcs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: sf bay area
Posts: 430
Received 20 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

They also had their own F1 team back in the early 60's... Jean Behra was one of the factory drivers.
Old 06-24-2004, 03:07 PM
  #41  
fahren affair
Pro
 
fahren affair's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Newport Beach, California
Posts: 685
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

then porsche stepped on their dick with an abomination of an engine, the v-12 footwork porsche of the early '90s. they basically tried to mate two of the existing 1.5 litre v-6s (same units for the mid-'80s) with dismal results...this is why you don't make an half-*** attempt at f1.
Old 06-24-2004, 03:10 PM
  #42  
bet
Drifting
 
bet's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Indiana
Posts: 2,190
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally posted by 4ng crcs
They also had their own F1 team back in the early 60's... Jean Behra was one of the factory drivers.
I think Behra drove in the late 50's for Porsche in F2.

This is a good article:

http://www.grandprix.com/gpe/con-porsc.html
Old 06-24-2004, 03:12 PM
  #43  
matterhorn762
Instructor
 
matterhorn762's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Fort Bragg, North Carolina
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

What does TAG stand for and why was it used instead of the Porsche name?
Old 06-24-2004, 03:30 PM
  #44  
bet
Drifting
 
bet's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Indiana
Posts: 2,190
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally posted by matterhorn762
What does TAG stand for and why was it used instead of the Porsche name?
http://www.grandprix.com/gpe/eng-tagen.html
Old 06-24-2004, 04:10 PM
  #45  
fahren affair
Pro
 
fahren affair's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Newport Beach, California
Posts: 685
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by matterhorn762
What does TAG stand for and why was it used instead of the Porsche name?
techniques d’avant garde.

way back when, i think they were a french weapons contractor then owned by mansour ojjeh. ojjeh was a huge f1 fan and was a major sponsor till he bought into mclaren.

while with mclaren, he commissioned porsche to build the twin-turbo v-6. tag also absorbed watchmaker heuer (the then official timekeeper of f1) which then became tag-heuer.

Last edited by fahren affair; 06-24-2004 at 06:04 PM.


Quick Reply: Will They EVER Come Back?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 02:59 PM.