Notices
996 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:

How low should I go?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-03-2019, 06:13 PM
  #1  
TexSquirrel
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
TexSquirrel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Richmond, TX
Posts: 5,376
Received 2,492 Likes on 1,332 Posts
Default How low should I go?

I’ve been thinking about lowering my coil overs, but I’m not sure how low I want to go.
I’m currently ROW in front and about 5mm above USA/ROW in back.
I have the Bentley manual with the factory heights listed, but I’m a visual guy.
Also measuring with a tape measure is difficult as the car sets now. (Although having a metric only tape measure REALLY helps!)
I got creative and made my own gauges for the factory heights.

Now I can visualize the differences.



Old 11-03-2019, 06:15 PM
  #2  
TexSquirrel
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
TexSquirrel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Richmond, TX
Posts: 5,376
Received 2,492 Likes on 1,332 Posts
Default

But I still haven’t answered my own question.
since this is a daily driver, I’m considering ROW Sport.
Old 11-03-2019, 07:10 PM
  #3  
hatchetf15
Rennlist Member
 
hatchetf15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Mt Juliet, TN
Posts: 2,180
Received 1,044 Likes on 645 Posts
Default

I put mine to 120mm front / 130mm rear and like it fine. That’s ballpark GT3 and X74 spec and the fenders are at 65 cm +/- 3 mm on same wheels as yours. Ride quality not any different than ROW M030.
Old 11-04-2019, 10:10 AM
  #4  
strathconaman
Three Wheelin'
 
strathconaman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Toronto, north of the lake.
Posts: 1,573
Received 220 Likes on 138 Posts
Default

I went X73 height (on my C4S):



I guess your X74 height is the same as a GT2, if that puts it in perspective.
Old 11-04-2019, 11:40 AM
  #5  
808Bill
Rennlist Member
 
808Bill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Kauai
Posts: 8,053
Received 809 Likes on 545 Posts
Default

ROW SPORT is my vote since it's a DD. You can always change it up or down!
Hurry up so I can get some feedback for my install...

Last edited by 808Bill; 11-04-2019 at 10:09 PM.
Old 11-04-2019, 12:33 PM
  #6  
Capt. Obvious
Rennlist Member
 
Capt. Obvious's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Gig Harbor, WA
Posts: 4,007
Received 1,515 Likes on 834 Posts
Default

My personal favorite is GT3 height.
Old 11-04-2019, 03:21 PM
  #7  
sasilverbullet
Rennlist Member
 
sasilverbullet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 3,346
Received 795 Likes on 419 Posts
Default

Since I saw your car this weekend , I'd say go with the ROW sport since you're running the 285/40's in the rear. If you lower it more I would think the tire clearance would be a problem.
Old 11-04-2019, 04:09 PM
  #8  
hatchetf15
Rennlist Member
 
hatchetf15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Mt Juliet, TN
Posts: 2,180
Received 1,044 Likes on 645 Posts
Default



295 35 19 on the back...no rub at full compression. Rears at 130mm fronts at 120mm
The following users liked this post:
TexSquirrel (11-04-2019)
Old 11-04-2019, 04:42 PM
  #9  
Cogito_Ergo_Zoom
Pro
 
Cogito_Ergo_Zoom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 708
Received 25 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Are you tracking the car?

Physics and the relationship between load transfer and Cg height tells us that lower is better, but with a major caveat. Overlowering a car without corresponding adjustments and/or compensation to the major hard suspension ball joints/pickup points is one of the quickest ways to an ill handling car. Overlowering often results in misplaced roll centers which will actually cause the car to transfer more weight than if it was actually higher, increased bumpsteer at the front axle, not to mention overall issues with ride quality, compliance, and suspension travel on the street.

The X74 ride heights are a good "performance" ride height for street driven 996s on the factory suspension parts. The GT3 has different uprights & knuckles that relocate the ball joint locations to optimize for their lower ride heights and I don't recommend you go that low if handling is a higher priority than looks.


Old 11-04-2019, 08:01 PM
  #10  
hatchetf15
Rennlist Member
 
hatchetf15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Mt Juliet, TN
Posts: 2,180
Received 1,044 Likes on 645 Posts
Default

Zoom is describing what my previous 996 handled like after I put Koni Sports and HR lowering springs on with standard sways and links. Boy, speed bumps leaped up at me! Magnified bump steer tendency, unsettling rebound after sharp compressions. This time around I knew better. M030/X74 and all is right like I always thought a 911 should be. And I can take my neighborhood “traffic calming devices” at normal speed without ripping out my skid plate.
The following users liked this post:
Gingerman (11-04-2019)
Old 11-04-2019, 08:20 PM
  #11  
Astro
Pro
 
Astro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: MN
Posts: 505
Received 51 Likes on 29 Posts
Default

Well at least I finally know what ROW stands for after reading this thread... with the crappy MN roads and considering mine is a DD even in the winter, lowering looks great, but would not be practical.
Old 11-04-2019, 10:29 PM
  #12  
jandackson
Racer
 
jandackson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Woodland, CA
Posts: 461
Received 179 Likes on 100 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hatchetf15
Zoom is describing what my previous 996 handled like after I put Koni Sports and HR lowering springs on with standard sways and links. Boy, speed bumps leaped up at me! Magnified bump steer tendency, unsettling rebound after sharp compressions. This time around I knew better. M030/X74 and all is right like I always thought a 911 should be. And I can take my neighborhood “traffic calming devices” at normal speed without ripping out my skid plate.
From the tables above X74 is 30mm lower than stock. HR springs typically lower 1.25” which is 31.75 mm. What additional parts did you replace when you went with x74 to keep the geometry correct? I was going to go with Koni and HR.
Old 11-04-2019, 11:36 PM
  #13  
hatchetf15
Rennlist Member
 
hatchetf15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Mt Juliet, TN
Posts: 2,180
Received 1,044 Likes on 645 Posts
Default

If I were to use the Koni Sport again, I would use Eibach springs. For the reasons why, you can pm me. For X74, just X74 front top mounts, since I was told the stock tops don’t work. The drop links are all stock with M030 sways. All new (less than 2k miles) Porsche suspension which is working very well. I caveat by saying you would need adjustable front sway for aggressive front camber (my experience). I have my alignment to GT2 spec with the X74, running 15mm spacers on all corners to widen my C2 track. The photo in post #8 is with 19” wheels. Not as drastically low as the number -30mm would suggest. My other 996 on the HR was 5 or 6mm lower.

The ride on the 19’s is a little more jolting, by annoyance factor of 10%. I believe it when people say the 996 suspension is optimized for 18” wheels, mostly noticed on the front end.

Last edited by hatchetf15; 11-04-2019 at 11:45 PM. Reason: Ride quality comment
Old 11-04-2019, 11:37 PM
  #14  
TexSquirrel
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
TexSquirrel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Richmond, TX
Posts: 5,376
Received 2,492 Likes on 1,332 Posts
Default

I wish I could get a lifetime alignment so I could try all the different heights.

I found out today that there is a greater chance I‘ll be unemployed soon.
I should know something this week.
So no plans to lower my car this weekend.
When I do lower it, I’m going to go either ROW Sport if my company is still around in 2020, or I get another job that requires commuting.
I’ll maybe try X74 if I decide to semi-retire and get a closer job...or open up my own auto repair shop.
Old 11-05-2019, 12:00 AM
  #15  
hatchetf15
Rennlist Member
 
hatchetf15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Mt Juliet, TN
Posts: 2,180
Received 1,044 Likes on 645 Posts
Default

^^^Throwing out major positive vibes for you!


Quick Reply: How low should I go?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 06:22 AM.