993tt Or 355 Gtb?
My brother is torn between the 2 cars both appear to be excellent condition. I'd be interested to hear your views.
Thanks.
Harry
I had a 1988 Lamborghini Jalpa for 3 years and drove it as a daily driver for the most part and while it was pretty reliable, the parts where expensive and it did show interior wear MUCH more than any Porsche. Ferraris are kinda the same way, at least from my experience.
The 355 puts you in a nice exclusive club, but so does the 993 TT

Here was my Jalpa...
Trending Topics
Main down point to Ferrari is mantainace, is more expensive and maybe more prone to failures of all kind. Hope you brother can enjoy this forever beautiful Ferrari.
J.Seven
The Best Porsche Posts for Porsche Enthusiasts
Harry
J.Seven
I've never owned a Ferrari, but I've driven several models on various occasions (355gtb, 360 F1, 456GT). In fact, I had my heart set on a Ferrari until I drove a 993TT for the first time.
There's no doubt that the Ferrari's exterior lines, and the aural beauty of a Tubi exhaust, will set your heart racing (I'll never forget the incredible sound that my Ducati made with a Fast by Ferraci exhaust). However, I think the Ferrari falls short of a 993TT in several other areas - some practical, and some purely performance issues.
The TT has quite a bit more torque than a 355 or 360, which means a lot to me. Actually, I like the 456 much more than the 355 or 360, simply because it "feels" more powerful to me, even though I know it's significantly slower in terms of acceleration. There's nothing like a 12-cylinder Ferrari engine.
The 360's interior is beautiful, but the 355 interior looks very kit-car-ish to me (no offense intended). Admittedly, my 993TT has the full Turbo S leather and carbon fiber interior, which dresses things up quite a bit.
I've been on the track with several 355's and 360's, and they don't seem to handle track abuse nearly as well as a 993. Reliability at those extremes is a significant issue. The worst thing that's ever happened to my 993TT in 3 years of track use is a turbo hose that blew off and needed to be easily reattached. I've never seen a 355 or 360 with that sort of track reliability record, despite the fact that the non-turbocharged engines should theoretically be lessed stressed than mine. A 993TT really is an incredibly well-engineered machine.
I test drove a two-year-old 456GT at Miller Motorcars one time that had the following items in need of repair: delaminating rear windshield, leaking shock absorbers, faulty electrical system (sometimes car would start, sometimes not), peeling engine paint. A brand-new 360 at Ferrari of Atlanta had a driver's seat that would not lock in place, and kept flying rearwards on acceleration. The salesman commented that it kept breaking despite the mechanic's best attempts to repair it.
Of course, I still love Ferrari's and hope to buy one someday when practical issues simply don't matter to me as much. But, if your brother can only have one high-end performance sports car, I suspect he'll get much more real-world pleasure out of a 993TT. btsscott is correct in that the 993TT will need to be given a better, lowered suspension, but that's about it.
I couldn't agree with you more. If money was no object I will buy the F-40.
He drove my RS but he wasn't really impressed with the 'lack of acceleration' in his opinion and was looking for a turbo but he was lucky enough to come across some money so he widened his search to include the F355, which he eventually bought. He didn't get to drive the turbo which turned up at the same time as the F355 because it got sold and I think he felt that the Ferrari was in such an impeccable condition he didn't want to risk missing out by looking around and being undecided. I guess fate made the choice for him. I hope he enjoys his car which should be delivered to him having had a service by the main dealer very shortly.
Harry

