Notices
993 Turbo Forum 1995-1998
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

More 100-300kph stuff

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-13-2008, 03:47 AM
  #61  
Felix
Addict
Rennlist Lifetime Member
 
Felix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 1,748
Received 15 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TB993tt
It is just the way the scaling is, here's mine in the same graph:
Silly me - I'm more used to seeing time on the X axis and speed on the Y axis and saw yet didn't see that the graph was transposed.
Old 12-13-2008, 09:45 AM
  #62  
TB993tt
Addict
Rennlist Member

Thread Starter
 
TB993tt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 4,441
Received 108 Likes on 68 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TB993tt
I am still a inquisitive as to what role the airstrip at Bruntingthorpe plays in slowing down acceleration relative to other venues. It has the slope of 5m for the first mile and the surface is particularly nasty. I have put a couple of pics below so those who have not been can get a taster - It is a rough finish tarmac/asphalt () which is littered with bitumen repair strips which stand proud of the surface (second pic attempts to show this)
Driving over it makes a racket and it contibutes to the lateral stability (or lack thereof) at high speed





I haven't got much data in current configuration but I have a 60-139mph done on a regular strip of tarmac, slight downhill but negligable, it took 8.74s.

I have looked at 5 runs at Bruntingthorpe when the fuel load (and passenger) load would be comparable and the 60-139mph takes ~9.8s

So how much faster would my 0-300kph be on some kinder flatter tarmac ?
Just dragged this thread up as I was enjoyingthe video below watching the Porsche GB 997GT2 press car (in the best colour ) dragging down Bruntingthorpe runway and was taking great interest in the comments being made about the surface and the uphill and the effect it has on acceleration.

They also talk about a strong wind but it would have to be a North easterly to effect the times and that is a very rare direction so it would have been a cross wind which doesn't really hit the cars until you get 70% along the track @ around 170mph.

The GT2 did 0-100mph in 7.95s factory quote is 7.4s - that is quite a lot of drag, I would like to test at higher speeds if any of our regulars fancy setting a mini session over the festive break

Video below:

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=sb4xJR...eature=related
Old 12-15-2008, 10:10 AM
  #63  
MOD500
Racer
 
MOD500's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Yorkshire, UK
Posts: 449
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Count me in
Old 12-15-2008, 11:17 AM
  #64  
JamesE
Addict
Rennlist Member

RIP
 
JamesE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: London
Posts: 802
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I could be in, but I think the runway is full of cars at the moment.
Old 12-15-2008, 11:38 AM
  #65  
JBL930
Not Forgotten
 
JBL930's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: South East, UK
Posts: 1,215
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

You know i'm in

Hope it's not between the 28th of Dec and the 4th of Jan though as i'm not around. Anytime before or after, even xmas day
Old 12-15-2008, 11:50 AM
  #66  
JBL930
Not Forgotten
 
JBL930's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: South East, UK
Posts: 1,215
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jean
TB I agree with your analysis, interesting when one breaks it down to sectors, aerodynamics did seem to play a big role. Looks like their own CTR yellowbird philosophy pays well, this was a direct attempt by these two gentlemen at targeting the RUF record using like for like engineering, and they succeeded.

I heard from different sources that this engine had 962 IMSA heads. On this picture it looks like an engine with twin plugs and with the intercooler that looks like a OEM BEHR as you mentioned, with custom end tanks, and that these two gentlemen used for their 80' and early 90s monster creations.


And this one is for Jussi. Check this beauty, who needs lightweight Mov its?


Jean, is that the same as the engine in this thread? Now owned by another rennlister and going in a narrow body 964
https://rennlist.com/forums/showthre...ferrerid=40678
Old 12-17-2008, 03:37 PM
  #67  
R2FU
Track Day
 
R2FU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: London
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Guys, I'd love to join you at Bruntingthorpe if you'll have me. Two small issues of a baby due on Christmas eve and my car being off the road right now to consider but other than that .... !
Old 12-23-2008, 04:45 PM
  #68  
Jussi
Pro
 
Jussi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: on the road..
Posts: 578
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by R2FU
Guys, I'd love to join you at Bruntingthorpe if you'll have me. Two small issues of a baby due on Christmas eve and my car being off the road right now to consider but other than that .... !
Congratulations !

I had same "problems" but now they have been solved..

Firstly:
I finalized my datalogging systems last night - see pictures

another ones, quite a mess btw:
Left side Right side Finalized
Now my car is ready again and waiting suitable airport weather.

Secondly:
We got also a baby this morning !
Old 12-23-2008, 05:36 PM
  #69  
Bradford
Rennlist Member
 
Bradford's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Westlake Village, Ca. Lake Tahoe, Ca.
Posts: 1,605
Received 28 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Juha, here are your pictures. Congrats on your new baby!









Quick Reply: More 100-300kph stuff



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 08:02 AM.