Is 1995 is vintage year for 993?
09-28-2003, 01:35 AM
#16
If I remember correctly, the 12HP difference is in peak power. The big difference, as others have pointed out, is torque at lower revs, where the difference can be closer to 30-40 ft-lbs.
09-29-2003, 10:43 AM
#17
Burning Brakes
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Singapore
Posts: 935
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ray,
I've got a '95 with 18" Classic II wheels. IIRC, the only mod required is the steering wheel brace, but even that mod appears to be inconclusive.
CP,
Here's another thread on the '95 vs. '96 debate:
https://rennlist.com/forums/showthre...threadid=82304
I've got a '95 with 18" Classic II wheels. IIRC, the only mod required is the steering wheel brace, but even that mod appears to be inconclusive.
CP,
Here's another thread on the '95 vs. '96 debate:
https://rennlist.com/forums/showthre...threadid=82304
09-29-2003, 11:20 AM
#18
Nordschleife Master
Originally posted by Ray Calvo
"Advantages" of each:
'95: Fewer CEL problems, apparently don't have the intake carbon buildup problems of later years, no "Immobilizer" lock system, cheaper than later cars. 12HP advantage of later years I believe is largely psychological.
'96 and up: You can diagnose CEL problems with a laptop and independent software, nicer third brake light, can fit 18" wheels on them w/o some suspension changes, late '96 and newer don't have wiring harness trouble, only way to get a C4S.
"Advantages" of each:
'95: Fewer CEL problems, apparently don't have the intake carbon buildup problems of later years, no "Immobilizer" lock system, cheaper than later cars. 12HP advantage of later years I believe is largely psychological.
'96 and up: You can diagnose CEL problems with a laptop and independent software, nicer third brake light, can fit 18" wheels on them w/o some suspension changes, late '96 and newer don't have wiring harness trouble, only way to get a C4S.
