Originally Posted by jdistefa (Post 12974219)

List has been updated on page 8.


Bill, short answer is no.

964 guys will have to go the whole way with 993 conversion of front end.


Yes Chris, no problem.

Originally Posted by Bill Verburg (Post 12974158)

You know that you need it!

Originally Posted by Bill Verburg (Post 12974173)

Has there been any effort to take into account the difference in the different lengths needed between the 964 and 993?

The 993 A arm places the wheel carriers 12.5mm more outboard on each side than on 964. This is due to differences on the longitudinal mounts. As a result the 964 w/ stock longitudinals will need a 12mm shorter tierod.

Originally Posted by cobalt (Post 12974440)

It;s a new year and a new season. :D



I am already using the 993 longitudinals. Was considering going back to the 964 and using the outboard settings like the turbo. I have mounted tires to the 9.5 & 11 Speedline RSR wheels and plan on using them to make adjustments to the suspension and will order new wheels this year as well. Might as well go for broke.

I have not been able to find any info on if the RSR used the inner or outer settings. I am assuming they used the outer from what I have been able to determine so far.

Originally Posted by Bill Verburg (Post 12975306)

993RSR used the 964 front longitudinals and outer holes, This combo pushes the wheel carrier out 30mm/side compared to a stock n/b 964

Originally Posted by cobalt (Post 12974112)

Ira,

This is tempting. I might be ready to make this change. Lets talk as you get closer to having these ready.

Originally Posted by Tarett Engineering (Post 12970078)

Yes, it's a joint effort with ERP. Cary is a very talented suspension designer, and great to work with. I came up with the a design, but Cary had the idea and resources to do an close copy of the OEM part, so we went that route. It took a lot longer to do it that way, but I it think it was well worth it.

Ira

Originally Posted by Bill Verburg (Post 12974173)

Has there been any effort to take into account the difference in the different lengths needed between the 964 and 993?
The 993 A arm places the wheel carriers 12.5mm more outboard on each side than on 964. This is due to differences on the longitudinal mounts. As a result the 964 w/ stock longitudinals will need a 12mm shorter tierod.

Originally Posted by jdistefa (Post 12974219)

List has been updated on page 8.
Bill, short answer is no.
964 guys will have to go the whole way with 993 conversion of front end.
Yes Chris, no problem.

Originally Posted by jdistefa (Post 12974438)

Yes, and I know there are a couple 964 builds that have done just that. Maybe if Ira gets enough demand he could do something 964 specific (i.e. 12mm shorter) but for now it appeared that the main market would be 993 especially given the NLA component.

Originally Posted by Spyerx (Post 12975478)

On the above you do not need the 993 longs on a 964! Look at my build. If you are doing the ERP outers with gt2 uprights you can ask Cary to supply a shorter outer that will work with the 993 inner design (mine are stock welded 993 pieces, the cup monoballs will work). This is what I did.

Originally Posted by hchc (Post 12975952)

For a street car with spirited driving, would one feel the difference between this and pinning?

Originally Posted by NYC993 (Post 12986542)

So when can this be ordered?

Originally Posted by jdistefa (Post 12987135)

Originally Posted by NYC993 (Post 12987330)

Thanks. Was wondering if it's going to be closer to 2 week or 8 week time frame.